Showcase Panagor 90mm f/2.8 Macro

[Conrad]

I have this lens since the 1980's with an MC (Minolta) mount. I always considered it to be a sharp and versatile lens. I recently got an MC-M43 adapter and gave this lens a chance for a second life. All in all I am quite pleased with it, but maybe even more, I am pleased with the focal length. I wish Panasonic would market a 90mm/2.8.

Technical stuff of this lens: FL 90 mm, f/2.8 max NA (I measured it to be f/3.0 btw), weight ~500g, focuses down to 1:1 (sensor-object distance 34 cm, working distance ~10 cm), filter thread 62 mm.

Pictures of the lens on-camera:

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

And with the lens in closest focus position:

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[Conrad]

Landscape samples

From a recent trip to Northumberland:

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[Conrad]

Portrait sample

Lighting was a bit difficult (strong green hue due to overhead branches). No sharpening, f/4.5:

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

100% crop:

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

This lens is indeed sharp, but a bit low on macro contrast. Together with its noticeable longitudinal chromatic aberration, this renders skin quite well.

 

[Conrad]

Macro samples

Casual flower shot (f/11):

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

And now a tougher subject: diamond. Here you can notice the CA, and that it results in an overall unsharp rendering of the highlights. Shot at f/5.6.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[Bokeh Diem]

Very nice work, a professional assessment.

That lens is definitely a keeper.

Bokeh D

 

[petronius]

Mine is a PK mounted lens. I used it on a Pentax ME before.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[Niemer]

View attachment 468559 77/365 by -J-, on Flickr

View attachment 468560 60/365 by -J-, on Flickr

 

[Phil.H]

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

My first attempt with this lens. It was a bit windy so it took a lot of shots to get anything half decent.

 

[Phil.H]

I've noticed my lens has a fault. It has a band across the bottom of the images when used a certain angles, it's there on the image above. When I use it now I crop the image to square to remove it.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[Phil.H]

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[Phil.H]

I haven't used the lens for ages because I thought it was faulty, but I found out today that it is light leaking in from the adaptor. Time to get another adaptor and have some fun.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[Phil.H]

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[Phil.H]

Handheld @1:1 + Raynox 150. This beetle was 2mm in length at the most.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[Phil.H]

Same set up as above but these were taken indoors with flash.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[Deleted member 29285]

Same set up as above but these were taken indoors with flash.

View attachment 826159 View attachment 826160 View attachment 826161 View attachment 826162

I prefer the ones with natural lighting, there's more modelling that way.

 

[Phil.H]

I prefer the ones with natural lighting, there's more modelling that way.

I prefer those also. I just wish I could find something a little bigger that didn't move so much to photograph.

 

[Deleted member 29285]

I prefer those also. I just wish I could find something a little bigger that didn't move so much to photograph.

You could always put them in the fridge to slow them down.