I posted this at RFF recently and I thought it may be of interest here as well. I was out taking some photos in a hoop pine forest recently and was shooting with the 67ii (Takumar 105mm f2.4) on a tripod and using PanF+. When I got to the end of the roll of Ilford just out of curiosity before packing up I grabbed the OMD with the PanaLeica 25mm f1.4 out of the bag and took a quick hand held shot roughly from where the Pentax had been set up. I let the OMD do the metering in AE and focused manually and the ISO was 400 ... the aperture was at f1.4. The end results are interesting ... the little Oly didn't disgrace itself at all in the presence of MF IMO and it also did a better job of metering in AE than I managed with the 67ii using the spot meter. I managed to over expose the PanF+ slightly and consequently the highlights are a little burnt in the Penatx shots. I've posted both images so you can have a looksee and note what the major differences are ... and I'd be interested to hear some thoughts and opinions. I know what I think but I'm curious about whatever observations are made by other eyes.