OM-D and pancake lens ;;;

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by PantelisMor, May 12, 2013.

  1. PantelisMor

    PantelisMor Mu-43 Veteran

    Jan 14, 2013
    Hi guys , i am owner of Om-d with the panasonic 14-45. I am interest to buy a pancake lens. What do you think it's the best choice for my oly ;;;;
  2. zcd

    zcd Mu-43 Regular

    Mar 14, 2013
    Alberta, Canada
    The P14 or P20 :D
  3. yekimrd

    yekimrd Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jun 14, 2012
    Cincinnati, OH
    +1 although I would lean more towards the P14.
  4. PantelisMor

    PantelisMor Mu-43 Veteran

    Jan 14, 2013
    Why p14 :;; i heard that p20 late to focus....
  5. Fmrvette

    Fmrvette This Space For Rent

    May 26, 2012
    Detroit, Michigan
    Depends; do you want a slightly wide angle (28mm in 35mm equiv) or a more normal view (40mm equiv)?

    I have both the 14mm and 20mm lenses; the 20mm is, I think, somewhat sharper. I haven't noticed that the 20mm is particularly slow to focus, although I don't shoot sports or high energy children :biggrin:.

    Yesterday I used the 14mm in a hospital room when we visited my mother-in-law and the f/2.5 was fast enough to shoot hand held without a flash. The 20mm f/1.7 would have been faster, but it's a small room and the 14mm allowed better framing.

    If absolutely limited to one of the two I would keep the 14mm only because I need the wide angle more than the faster speed of the 20mm; the OM-D EM-5 does a pretty good job at higher ISO settings so I can rely on the sensor to pick up the difference between the 1.7 and 2.5 under most of the conditions under which I shoot. Of course YMMV.

    If you want something completely different :biggrin: consider the 15mm body cap lens. For $50 U.S. I consider it to be a bargain for the fun to be had. Of course you're limited to f/8 and only a couple of focus ranges but it's still a hoot to shoot.



  6. Anthon

    Anthon Mu-43 Regular

    Dec 8, 2012
    I had the P14, P20 and O17 2.8 and I sold all except the O17.

    The P14 is too wide for me and the P20's AF is a pain when it starts hunting.

    I'll trade the 17/2.8 for a 1.8 when the price drops (I hope with the E-P5 release)
  7. Gonewest

    Gonewest Mu-43 Regular

    May 3, 2013
    Cornwall, UK
    I'm with Anthlon!

    I kept my Oly 17/2.8 and sold the Pan 20/21.7 going against most of the advice I read on forums. I found no difference in sharpness and didn't like the purple fringing or focus hunting in low light (no problem in good light) displayed by my 20/1.7 on OM-D.
  8. Uncle Frank

    Uncle Frank Photo Enthusiast

    Jul 26, 2012
    San Jose, CA
    14/2.5 - 17/2.8 - 20/1.7

    The choice is more about subject preference than lens performance. I'm biased towards people pics, so I sold the 14/2.5 and kept the 20/1.7. I haven't tried the 17mm compromise yet, but if I ever do, I'll opt for the more expensive but faster 17/1.8.
  9. PantelisMor

    PantelisMor Mu-43 Veteran

    Jan 14, 2013
    I have read for pancakes. The truth is that i am between pan 20/1,7 and oly 17/1,8.... I am comfused... I think i have to search more....
  10. Lawrence A.

    Lawrence A. Mu-43 All-Pro

    Mar 14, 2012
    New Mexico
    The Olympus 17mm f1.8 is not a pancake; the 2.8 is.

    I loved the Panasonic 20 1.7, but I'm more a "normal" than wide angle shooter.

    Panasonic also has the pancake zoom 14-42PZ, though earlier versions seem to have issues that you'd want to research.
  11. Danny_SWE

    Danny_SWE Mu-43 All-Pro

    Apr 30, 2013
    Sweden (Gothenburg)
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.