Showcase Olympus Pen 100mm f3.5

gscara

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
80
Location
Richmond, British Columbia, Canada
Couldn't find an existing thread for this lens. This lens is tiny and fits well in my coat pocket. Easy to focus and quite sharp. Lack of contrast easily fixed in post processing.
Olympus100mm.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Overall, a joy to use and highly recommended
 

nsd20463

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
138
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
I like the Pen FT 100mm f/3.5 too. It's size and weight on a GF1 are great. But it took me several weeks of on and off messing with it to get results I liked. Initially everything was too flarey and too soft.
I also discovered that our toilet paper rolls make a perfect press-fit hood on this lens as-is, with no vignetting.

Here are some pre and post processing photos I'm happy with with this lens, showing how much better it is with a little rework in (for me) digikam.

Post processed:
p1070213_worked_resized.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

View image in gallery

As it came from the camera:
p1070213_camera.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

View image in gallery

Post processed:
p1070384_worked_resized.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

View image in gallery

As it came from the camera:
p1070384_camera.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

View image in gallery
 

EdH

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Messages
640
Location
Devon, UK
Real Name
Ed
PA123541-sml.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

MarylandUSA

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Messages
422
Location
Poolesville, Maryland
Real Name
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
My E. Zuiko Auto-T 100/3.5 is the later, FT version--that is, the version whose aperture ring is marked conventionally (f/3.5 through f/16) and linearly (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). The serial number is 210147, so my specimen was made too early to benefit from the improved coating that reportedly was introduced after, I think, 24xxxx.

Here are three cellphone shots of the half-frame 100/3.5 shown alongside the full-frame Konica Hexanon 100/2.8:


100-2.8_Konica_Hexanon_AR+100_3.5_Oly_half-frameP1010888.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


100-2.8_Konica_Hexanon_AR+100_3.5_Oly_half-frameP1010889.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
100-2.8_Konica_Hexanon_AR+100_3.5_Oly_half-frameP1010891.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)



And now, my test shots from the E. Zuiko Auto-T 100/3.5. All images were shot on my Panasonic Lumix G3 body. The images are JPEGs, straight out of the camera.

f/4, 1/320th second, ISO 250, handheld, focused on the lower-left corner of the right-hand window:
F4_roof_Olympus_100-3.5_320th_ISO250_P1010762.JPG
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


shot on a sunny day, hooded. f/8, ISO 400:
roof_100_3.5_Olympus_half-frame_f8_ISO_400_P1010877.JPG
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)



f/4, 1/250th second, ISO 250, handheld, focused on the near edge of the brown circle surrounding the tree:
F4_neighborshouse_Olympus_100-3.5_250th_ISO250P1010766.JPG
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


shot on a sunnier day:
f/8, ISO 400, handheld. Check out the detail in the corners. f/8 really improves depth of field; the tree branches almost come alive, I used a threaded hood, either 3-inch or 1.6-inch:

neighbor__100_3.5_Olympus_half-frame_f8_ISO_400YES_CORNERS_P1010878.JPG
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)



f/4, 1/400th second, ISO 250, handheld, focused on the street sign:
F4_streetsign_Olympus_100-3.5_400th_ISO250P1010769.JPG
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


f/8, ISO 400, handheld, shot on a sunnier day:
streetsign__100_3.5_Olympus_half-frame_f8_ISO_400_P1010879.JPG
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


tripod, f/3.5, 1/2000th, ISO 160:
Olympus_Pen_F_Auto_T_100-3.5_at_f3.5.JPG
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)



tripod, f/4, 1/2000th, ISO 160:
Olympus_Pen_F_Auto_T_100-3.5_at_f4.JPG
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


tripod, f/5.6, 1/1300th, ISO 160:
Olympus_Pen_F_Auto_T_100-3.5_at_f5.6.JPG
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


tripod, f/8, 1/500th, ISO 160:
Olympus_Pen_F_Auto_T_100-3.5_at_f8.JPG
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

gnarlydog australia

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 23, 2015
Messages
3,674
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Real Name
Damiano Visocnik
Thanks to this Forum, and other samples I have seen on Flickr, I decided to get yet another 100mm manual focus lens.
I was after a compact size lens that would have decent sharpness (although I am not obsessed by that) requiring a short adapter (not a fan of M42 or other SLR lenses where the adapter is so large).
Initial test have revealed that the lens is very sharp from wide open and I can not see getting sharper when stopped down, just deeper DOF.
Here is a quick casual portrait that to my surprise turned out incredibly sharp despite 1/50 sec hand-held (thanks to the brilliant Olympus IBIS).

27420528528_7f9b07ea9e_h.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
Melt APR18 by gnarlydog, on Flickr

And here a slightly different portrait at minimum focus distance, again wide open at f3.5

DVM19909.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


crop of above
DVM19909_cr.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Last edited:

gnarlydog australia

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 23, 2015
Messages
3,674
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Real Name
Damiano Visocnik
stopped down a bit (visible pentagon shaped aperture in the flare)
Back light is the harshest test one can subject a lens to: this one handles it OK unless the light falls directly onto the front element (a deep hood is a must)

27086317607_6f26b97896_h.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
old horse by gnarlydog, on Flickr

28077897748_b888f2a544_h.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
ridge horses by gnarlydog, on Flickr
 

gnarlydog australia

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 23, 2015
Messages
3,674
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Real Name
Damiano Visocnik

MarylandUSA

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Messages
422
Location
Poolesville, Maryland
Real Name
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
I've owned this lens for about four years. The only reason I never use it is that my Sigma 60/2.8 has resolution to spare. I've posted some test shots in this thread. I slightly prefer the rendering and corner sharpness of the Hexanon 100/2.8. But the Olympus 100/3.5 is much narrower (43mm filter size vs. 55).
 

Latest threads

Top Bottom