/ Register


Olympus OM-D and some REALLY expensive lenses

Discussion in 'Olympus Cameras' started by jambaj0e, Apr 14, 2012.

Top Rated
  1. jambaj0e

    jambaj0e Mu-43 Top Veteran

    816
    Aug 31, 2010
    Thanks to Matt Duclos, I got to not only play around with the OM-D camera today, but we got to try some awesome lenses.

    Between the two of us, we had the Olympus 12mm f/2.0 and 45mm f/1.8, Panaleica 45mm f/1.8, as well as these two tank busters!

    The Olympus OM-D E-M5 on a $15,000 Leica APO 400mm f/2.8

    7075688063_b556399195_b.

    6929612802_3fa37eb22b_b.


    The Leica APO's front element compared to the Panasonic 20mm f1.7

    6929613476_973659c89e_b.



    $15,000 Leica APO 400mm f/2.8 on the left, the $60,000 Angenieux 24-290mm constant f/2.8 Optimo on the right, and oh, the Olympus OM-D camera in the middle =)

    6929614044_ed150e0f80_b.

    7075688743_a1af0156ee_b.
     
    jambaj0e, Apr 14, 2012
    #1
    • Like Like x 8
  2. bitmatt

    bitmatt Mu-43 Veteran

    271
    Apr 7, 2012
    Cleveland
    Matt
    Looks just a bit front-heavy.
     
    bitmatt, Apr 14, 2012
    #2
    • Like Like x 2
  3. jgregs

    jgregs Mu-43 Regular

    100
    Nov 21, 2010
    Southern Ontario
    Where? I don't see it
     
    jgregs, Apr 14, 2012
    #3
  4. lowincash

    lowincash Mu-43 Regular

    126
    Mar 6, 2012
    Los Angeles
    I think I'll have trouble putting that in my bag =/
     
    lowincash, Apr 14, 2012
    #4
  5. jambaj0e

    jambaj0e Mu-43 Top Veteran

    816
    Aug 31, 2010
    I think you may have trouble fitting the lenses in an airplane's overhead compartment, too, lol!
     
    jambaj0e, Apr 14, 2012
    #5
  6. starlabs

    starlabs Mu-43 Top Veteran

    856
    Sep 30, 2010
    Los Angeles
    f/2.8 for a prime? Too slow!



    :wink:
     
    starlabs, Apr 14, 2012
    #6
  7. jambaj0e

    jambaj0e Mu-43 Top Veteran

    816
    Aug 31, 2010
    Haha, almost missed the wink. It was about as small and obscured as the OM-D was in front of those two ginormous lenses =D
     
    jambaj0e, Apr 14, 2012
    #7
  8. MQDuclos

    MQDuclos Mu-43 Regular

    31
    Apr 11, 2012
    San Fernando Valley, CA
    It was great meeting you, Joe. I hope the SoCal meetup gets straightened out. Would love to meet more folks from the forum.
     
    MQDuclos, Apr 14, 2012
    #8
    • Like Like x 1
  9. jambaj0e

    jambaj0e Mu-43 Top Veteran

    816
    Aug 31, 2010
    You too, Matt. Very impressive set of lenses, and as you can see on Facebook's SLR Lounge (which I write for), the feedback has been awesome!

    Have fun at NAB!

    - Joe
     
    jambaj0e, Apr 14, 2012
    #9
  10. WT21

    WT21 Mu-43 Legend Subscribing Member

    5,761
    Feb 19, 2010
    Boston
    I thought that was the the NEX's new mid-telephoto zoom :biggrin:
     
    WT21, Apr 14, 2012
    #10
    • Like Like x 1
  11. NiVleKsg

    NiVleKsg New to Mu-43

    6
    Apr 14, 2012
    Wow. Crazy setup. I wonder if it will break if you accidentally hold it by only supporting the body and not the lens.
     
    NiVleKsg, Apr 14, 2012
    #11
  12. RevBob

    RevBob Super Moderator Subscribing Member

    4,545
    Jun 4, 2011
    NorthWestern PA
    Bob
    Hmmmm, think anyone would notice if you used one of those as a walk-around lens? :rolleyes: 
     
    RevBob, Apr 14, 2012
    #12
  13. gsciorio

    gsciorio Mu-43 Top Veteran

    636
    Dec 29, 2011
    Miami, FL
    So did you take any photos with the lenses?
     
    gsciorio, Apr 14, 2012
    #13
  14. LVL8hacker

    LVL8hacker Mu-43 Veteran

    322
    Jan 4, 2012
    Pinehurst, North Carolina
    Larry Anderson
    HA! I would have trouble putting that in my car!
     
    LVL8hacker, Apr 14, 2012
    #14
  15. Ned

    Ned Mu-43 Legend

    5,538
    Jul 18, 2010
    Alberta, Canada
    Sweet glass! I would really love that Leica lens.

    The Angenieux Optimo is too excessive for me as a fast super-zoom. I'd rather have a Zuiko 90-250mm f/2.8 and a Zuiko 35-100mm f/2. :)  We have interchangeable lenses so we don't have to carry something like that around. ;) 
     
    Ned, Apr 14, 2012
    #15
  16. Lordfshack

    Lordfshack Mu-43 Rookie

    14
    Jan 18, 2012
    I think you can still fit it in your pocket!
     
    Lordfshack, Apr 14, 2012
    #16
  17. songs2001

    songs2001 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    693
    Jul 8, 2011
    Of course, it is meant for those with deep pockets.
     
    songs2001, Apr 14, 2012
    #17
  18. jambaj0e

    jambaj0e Mu-43 Top Veteran

    816
    Aug 31, 2010
    You probably gotta carry it around in a ballistic case handcuffed to you, lol.
     
    jambaj0e, Apr 14, 2012
    #18
  19. jambaj0e

    jambaj0e Mu-43 Top Veteran

    816
    Aug 31, 2010
    Yes, I'd bet on the mount breaking if only holding on to the camera and not the lens, that's for sure!
     
    jambaj0e, Apr 14, 2012
    #19
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...