1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Showcase Olympus 70-300mm ED f/4-5.6 ZD 4/3

Discussion in 'Adapted Lens Sample Image Showcase' started by pdh, Mar 2, 2011.

  1. pdh

    pdh Mu-43 Top Veteran

    May 6, 2010
    I was slightly amazed to find that there wasn't an image thread for this lens.
    So here, by way of rectifying that, is a tree and a caterpillar ...

    View attachment 158663
    E-P2, MMF-1, 1/640s, f/8, 70mm, ISO200
    • Like Like x 9
  2. RetroBoy

    RetroBoy Mu-43 Regular

    Well, over a year later and no updates to this thread.

    I'm still using my 4/3rds 70-300mm. I find it works well on the E-PL2 with MMF-2 adapter.

    I only pull it out at certain times, like when I want the extra reach for say, shooting the moon:

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/retroboy07/7064319821/" title="Moon Feb 14 2012 by Retro.Boy.07, on Flickr"> 7064319821_c6b5b4d599_b. "1024" height="768" alt="Moon Feb 14 2012"></a>

    Or in this case where this tough looking Spider Wasp dragged this huge Wolf Spider backwards right across my back lawn and then up a four feet high brick wall. I didn't want to get too close:

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/retroboy07/6918215018/" title="Spider Wasp v Wolf Spider1 by Retro.Boy.07, on Flickr"> 6918215018_60c29f8dac_b. "1024" height="768" alt="Spider Wasp v Wolf Spider1"></a>

    100mm FL + on board flash
    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/retroboy07/6918216018/" title="Spider Wasp v Wolf Spider2 by Retro.Boy.07, on Flickr"> 6918216018_6a1e534e75_b. "768" height="1024" alt="Spider Wasp v Wolf Spider2"></a>

    158mm f/4.6
    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/retroboy07/7064293809/" title="Spider Wasp v Wolf Spider3 by Retro.Boy.07, on Flickr"> 7064293809_ba6b5dd6c4_b. "768" height="1024" alt="Spider Wasp v Wolf Spider3"></a>
    • Like Like x 8
    • Wow Wow x 1
  3. RetroBoy

    RetroBoy Mu-43 Regular

    I was happy to have this lens with me a couple of weeks ago.
    Went out to do some work near a small airport. Just happened to be an airshow going on at the time. Finished my work and shot a few planes...

    full stretch 300mm 1/1000 f5.6

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/retroboy07/7064358235/" title="Airshow1 by Retro.Boy.07, on Flickr"> 7064358235_90ca0a7b02_b. "1024" height="768" alt="Airshow1"></a>

    300mm 1/1000 f6.7
    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/retroboy07/7064358127/" title="Airshow2 by Retro.Boy.07, on Flickr"> 7064358127_3074be3333_b. "1024" height="768" alt="Airshow2"></a>

    SOOC jpeg shot through a cyclone wire fence at 300mm FL
    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/retroboy07/6918280182/" title="Airshow3 by Retro.Boy.07, on Flickr"> 6918280182_5bab3cf416_b. "1024" height="768" alt="Airshow3"></a>

    Next the Roulettes appeared:

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/retroboy07/7064357927/" title="Airshow4 by Retro.Boy.07, on Flickr"> 7064357927_bff4b8225c_b. "1024" height="768" alt="Airshow4"></a>

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/retroboy07/6918280008/" title="Airshow5 by Retro.Boy.07, on Flickr"> 6918280008_b6d4876569_b. "1024" height="768" alt="Airshow5"></a>

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/retroboy07/6918279876/" title="Airshow6 by Retro.Boy.07, on Flickr"> 6918279876_37fbbbb2fc_b. "1024" height="768" alt="Airshow6"></a>

    One of those days when I'm glad I packed the camera!
    • Like Like x 14
  4. MajorMagee

    MajorMagee Mu-43 All-Pro

    Feb 24, 2011
    Dayton, OH
    Thanks for posting these. I've been looking for something decent for birding, and these helped me decide to give this lens a try. (I have an old $10 Vivitar that's just way too soft at 300mm)
  5. Lawrence A.

    Lawrence A. Mu-43 All-Pro

    Mar 14, 2012
    New Mexico
    ZD 70-300 on E-M5

    A guess a smaller lens would be nice for this sort of thing, but the M.Zuiko 75-300 costs too much (and I've heard the quality is not better than the ZD) and the Panasonic 100-300 would leave me only part way to "smaller". So I'll continue using this lens, which is quite good for its price, and get the grip for the OM-D.

    [​IMG] P6046581.
    • Like Like x 4
  6. penfan2010

    penfan2010 Mu-43 All-Pro

    Nov 12, 2010
    NJ, USA
    PDH - thanks for starting the thread. Every so often I think I should sell my 4/3 70-300, and then a post extolling its virtues comes along (though never as direct as this). The photos on the other posts definitely show off the versatility of this lens. Here are a few more:

    P5262363. P5260159. P5182089. P5041913. Butterfly_Side_View.
    • Like Like x 4
  7. MAubrey

    MAubrey Photographer

    Jul 9, 2012
    Bellingham, WA
    Mike Aubrey
    People always talk about how poor this lens is, but I'm yet to be disappointed. It gives me nice 16x20s. That's enough for me.

    From a recent hike to the summit of Golden Ears:

    1/320 263mm f/8

    1/1600 70mm f/5.6

    Granted, its a bit of a heavy lens to carry up a mountain...the Oly 75-300 would have been more tolerable in that respect, but I'm willing to carry an extra 200g if it means that I don't need to spend $800-900.
    • Like Like x 5
  8. MajorMagee

    MajorMagee Mu-43 All-Pro

    Feb 24, 2011
    Dayton, OH
    Here are a couple that show this lens at about it's best.
    E-PL2 with Olympus Digital 70-300mm ED at 300mm, f5.6, 1/200 sec, ISO 1000

    E-PL2 with Olympus Digital 70-300mm ED at 300mm, f5.6, 1/200 sec, ISO 800
    • Like Like x 6
  9. penfan2010

    penfan2010 Mu-43 All-Pro

    Nov 12, 2010
    NJ, USA
    Mike - the second photo is brilliant - reminds me of those old Japanese prints. Very well-composed. Was it brutal hauling the lens along on the hike?
    • Like Like x 1
  10. MAubrey

    MAubrey Photographer

    Jul 9, 2012
    Bellingham, WA
    Mike Aubrey
    Thanks, I got a number of good pictures on the hike, but that one is definitely one of my favorites...I might create a thread for some of the others ones that turned out well. I had the 9-18mm and PL25 with me as well.

    The hike was strenuous enough by itself that I'm not sure I could quantify the extra weight of the lens--about 15 miles and 12 hours. Minimally, I think it was worth it to have with me at least this one time. The next time I make the climb--hopefully on a non-overcast day so there's more to see than cloud cover--I'll probably just bring the 9-18mm and 25mm. Or maybe I need to pick up one of those small, light telephotos like the 40-150mm...
  11. MAubrey

    MAubrey Photographer

    Jul 9, 2012
    Bellingham, WA
    Mike Aubrey
    Since there are so few images for this lens compared to other lenses, I decided I should add a few more here, if only so anyone debating a purchase has something to compare. Most of these are from the Panasonic G2, but a few are from the Olympus OM-D.

    One from the same hike as above...

    Showing off the 1:2 magnification...


    • Like Like x 9
  12. MAubrey

    MAubrey Photographer

    Jul 9, 2012
    Bellingham, WA
    Mike Aubrey
    I'm still aiming to expand the variety of images for this lens. This post should send the thread to two pages. All five these were taken with a Panasonic G2, hand held without any cropping. No IS? No problem.

    Panasonic G2 ISO400 125mm 1/200 f/8

    Panasonic G2 ISO200 300mm 1/500 f/7.1

    Panasonic G2 ISO160 300mm 1/500 f/7.1

    Panasonic G2 ISO125 300mm 1/500 f/7.1

    Panasonic G2 ISO200 300mm 1/500 f/7.1
    • Like Like x 6
  13. MajorMagee

    MajorMagee Mu-43 All-Pro

    Feb 24, 2011
    Dayton, OH
    E-PL2 with Olympus Digital 70-300mm ED at 300mm, f5.6, 1/160 sec, ISO 1000
    • Like Like x 3
  14. hkpzee

    hkpzee Mu-43 All-Pro

    Sep 5, 2011
    Hong Kong
    Great shots! Just curious, what's the shutter speed on these shots? It woudl be great if you could share the shots set-up info. These are amazingly sharp!
  15. MAubrey

    MAubrey Photographer

    Jul 9, 2012
    Bellingham, WA
    Mike Aubrey
    Sure, no problem. I've added focal lengths, shutter speeds, and f-numbers to them in the original post. They're shot RAW and processed in Lightroom with auto-tone, a clarity boost and a bit of sharpening.

    Beyond that, well, there's a pond about a block from my home. I spend a couple hours there with my camera every once in a while hoping something will show up. There's usually a group of mallards hanging around. I try to get as close as I can without scaring them to the other side of the pond. They hatched five ducklings this spring. Obviously, a four thirds lens isn't going to do much for birds in flight, but I'm pretty happy with what I have. I more regularly hang out at the wide and normal ends of the spectrum, so this was very much a convenient value choice.

    I *had* intended on picking up a monopod with the G2, but since I got the OM-D, I don't know if I really feel the need for one any more...
    • Like Like x 1
  16. MAubrey

    MAubrey Photographer

    Jul 9, 2012
    Bellingham, WA
    Mike Aubrey
    Continuing in my ongoing crusade to fill out this thread with more images...

    Olympus E-M5 ISO200 300mm f/5.6 1/250

    A few images I took indoors with just the heads of dandelions against a white background:
    Panasonic G2 ISO320 300mm f/9 1/500

    Panasonic G2 ISO400 300mm f/9 1/250

    Panasonic G2 ISO640 300mm f/9 1/500
    • Like Like x 7
    • Winner Winner x 1
  17. nueces snapper

    nueces snapper Mu-43 All-Pro

    Some great great shots here.

    Thanks. :2thumbs:
  18. MAubrey

    MAubrey Photographer

    Jul 9, 2012
    Bellingham, WA
    Mike Aubrey
    A few last images of dandelions, all using a Panasonic G2, handheld and manual focused except for that last two which were on a tripod.






    • Like Like x 6
  19. fluberman

    fluberman Mu-43 Top Veteran

    Sep 19, 2012
    I used this lens quite extensively with Olympus DSLR and when I bought GX1, I thought I would sell it. You know, a large lens in front of a small camera, held with a stretched arm.
    But then this lens still renders good pictures, combined with GX1. Perhaps I should keep it for the moment.

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/flubie/8128206929/" title="301/366 - Autumn is almost over by Flubie, on Flickr"> 8128206929_ba796c0c88_z. "481" height="640" alt="301/366 - Autumn is almost over"></a>
    • Like Like x 2
  20. ghetto

    ghetto Mu-43 Regular

    This lens is an odd one. I bought this lens more or less because it was dirt cheap ($160 lens + $50 adapter v.s. about $800 for the m43 version). I thought I would end up reselling this because it's such a beast and the focal length is so... ridiculous (my other favourite lens is the 17mm...)

    It's grown on me very very quickly. There's something about the images that look very pleasing. I know people say it's not as "sharp" as other lenses (like the 45mm f1.8 which I also have) but the images come out much more pleasing. I hate the size of the lens, it's ridiculous, it makes me look like an NEX user :) .

    Here's a surf pic I took today, and a crab pic I took a couple of weeks ago. Both taken with this lens. Surf pic was about 350metres away (best guess) and the crab pic was about 1 metre away.


    • Like Like x 6
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.