I have seen a few threads debating whether panasonic 45-200 is better. But it seemed to me that those using panasonic 45-200 happen to use a panasonic camera too and those with oly would go with the 40-150. I have an E-PL1 and will soon get the OMD. If the range on the 40-150 is not a problem, which one would you choose if you had an olympus camera ? I've seen conflicting remarks on the qualities of both the lenses so I'm not exactly sure if this actually has anything to do with the body you have. Also, how much of a difference does that extra 50mm (100mm in mft) make ?