I'm beginning to find I'm a big fan of tele zooms after getting my hands on the Panasonic 35-100 2.8. Looking back at my older pictures I love getting in tight and I'm really excited about the 40-150. I was eventually considering getting a 100-300 but the recent news linked below of a 1.4 teleconverter will bring the focal length to 210! For those who have existing Olympus teleconverters are they decent quality? What is lost when using one? I used to balk at any lens coming in at 1k but after using the 35-100 I understand the premium cost translates to. I'm thinking instead of having a 35-100 and a 100-300 I can just get away with a 40-150 + teleconverter. With the 35-100 going for about 950 used these days the 1500 is hard to swallow but the tele might push me over. Thoughts from those with teleconverter experience does my strategy seem sound? http://www.43rumors.com/ft5-olympus-40-150mm-f2-8-price-in-japan-will-be-160000-yen/ Either case interesting news =).