/ Register


  1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Showcase Olympus 35-100mm f/2.0 ZD 4/3

Discussion in 'Adapted Lens Sample Image Showcase' started by Rasmus, Jun 1, 2014.

 
 
Top Rated
Page 1 of 3
  1. Rasmus

    Rasmus Mu-43 Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    780
    Nov 16, 2013
    Stockholm, Sweden.
    No, I don't own this amazing lens. I just hope that someone does, and will start posting images now that the thread exists. :) 
     
    Rasmus, Jun 1, 2014
    #1
  2. OzRay

    OzRay Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    4,991
    Jan 29, 2010
    South Gippsland, Australia
    Ray, not Oz
    OzRay, Jun 1, 2014
    #2
  3. pogipoints

    pogipoints Mu-43 Regular

    62
    Oct 6, 2015
    Neil M
    Incredible lens, would always be on my EM1 if it weren't for the weight.

    PA240165.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
     
    pogipoints, Oct 26, 2015
    #3
    • Like Like x 4
  4. nstelemark

    nstelemark Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    3,235
    May 28, 2013
    Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
    Larry
    ^^^^^^^^^^

    Like the car!
     
    nstelemark, Oct 26, 2015
    #4
  5. esnift

    esnift Mu-43 Veteran

    246
    Mar 17, 2013
    Boston, MA
    Dan
    A little stroll around Brookline Reservoir in Boston the other night:

    22376161080_3e80f1dd76_k.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

    The viewing tree.

    22376161390_878f821c2a_k.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

    Complementary

    22575334821_06ca280166_k.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

    Brookline reservoir

    22538125556_6aafd11f1f_k.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

    Full moon leaves
     
    esnift, Oct 29, 2015
    #5
    • Like Like x 6
  6. esnift

    esnift Mu-43 Veteran

    246
    Mar 17, 2013
    Boston, MA
    Dan
    esnift, Nov 5, 2015
    #6
    • Like Like x 9
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. Rasmus

    Rasmus Mu-43 Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    780
    Nov 16, 2013
    Stockholm, Sweden.
    Merry Christmas from me and my new 35-100!
    PC240005.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
     
    Rasmus, Dec 25, 2015
    #7
    • Like Like x 4
  8. Rasmus

    Rasmus Mu-43 Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    780
    Nov 16, 2013
    Stockholm, Sweden.
    A cross in a former Cholera Cemetery in Stockholm.
    P2020012.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
     
    Rasmus, Feb 3, 2016
    #8
    • Like Like x 4
  9. Rasmus

    Rasmus Mu-43 Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    780
    Nov 16, 2013
    Stockholm, Sweden.
    Gullmarsplan. Very far from being the prettiest subway station in Stockholm.
    P2020018.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
     
    Rasmus, Feb 3, 2016
    #9
    • Like Like x 3
  10. Rasmus

    Rasmus Mu-43 Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    780
    Nov 16, 2013
    Stockholm, Sweden.
    At a Pen F demo in the local store.
    P2020054.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
     
    Rasmus, Feb 3, 2016
    #10
    • Like Like x 6
  11. Phocal

    Phocal Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    4,906
    Jan 3, 2014
    Houston
    I really want this lens. After I get the 300 Pro, 7-14 and 8mm it will probably be next :) 
     
    Phocal, Feb 3, 2016
    #11
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. Rasmus

    Rasmus Mu-43 Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    780
    Nov 16, 2013
    Stockholm, Sweden.
    Yup. I've noticed that when I switch between the 150/2 and the Panasonic 35-100/2.8 I always like the 150/2 images better so I decided to get the 35-100/2.0. Now I need to decide if I want to keep the Panasonic or not. I guess it will see even less use now.

    My 7-14 problem is that I can't decide if I want the SHG 7-14 or the 7-14 Pro...
     
    Rasmus, Feb 4, 2016
    #12
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Phocal

    Phocal Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    4,906
    Jan 3, 2014
    Houston
    There is just something magical about the images from the SHG lenses. Even tho the 50-200 gives me more reach I never use it anymore, just work harder to get closer with the 150.

    I thought about the 7-14's and I really want the faster Pro lens.
     
    Phocal, Feb 4, 2016
    #13
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  14. pogipoints

    pogipoints Mu-43 Regular

    62
    Oct 6, 2015
    Neil M
    I was considering getting the panasonic because although I love the oly 35-100, it's too cumbersome to carry around. I've hesitated because the oly's images are so good that I don't know if I'll be happy with the panasonic.
    Rasmus, I'd be interested on your take on a direct comparison between the two 35-100 zooms.
     
    pogipoints, Feb 4, 2016
    #14
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. Phocal

    Phocal Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    4,906
    Jan 3, 2014
    Houston
    I will probably end up with the Panasonic also, only because it will make a good lens to have with me all the time. But, will get the Oly 35-100 first.
     
    Phocal, Feb 4, 2016
    #15
  16. Speedliner

    Speedliner Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    2,663
    Mar 2, 2015
    Southern NJ, USA
    Rob
    You're funny. I won't even mention the O14-35, f2 SHG. Oops.
     
    Speedliner, Feb 4, 2016
    #16
    • Funny Funny x 1
  17. Phocal

    Phocal Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    4,906
    Jan 3, 2014
    Houston
    LOL, don't worry it is on my list as well.........all the ƒ2.0 lenses as well as the 90-250 and 300/2.8 are on it
     
    Phocal, Feb 4, 2016
    #17
    • Like Like x 2
  18. Speedliner

    Speedliner Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    2,663
    Mar 2, 2015
    Southern NJ, USA
    Rob
    Its a shame our favorite lenses are from a last generation system with suboptimal AF speed. They're all big and heavy too negating some of the benefit.
     
    Speedliner, Feb 4, 2016
    #18
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. Phocal

    Phocal Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    4,906
    Jan 3, 2014
    Houston
    That's fine with me. I don't really need the AF speed except for sports and for that I will get the Pro lenses. Besides, my 150mm ƒ2.0 is a lot smaller then my Canon 300mm ƒ2.8 was and more versatile. I think the 300 Pro will change a lot of that tho.
     
    Phocal, Feb 4, 2016
    #19
  20. Speedliner

    Speedliner Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    2,663
    Mar 2, 2015
    Southern NJ, USA
    Rob
    Yes, but those SHG lenses are as big or bigger than their f2.8 FF equivalents.

    Honest opinion....do you think the SHG lenses are superior to the m43 Pros? I have the 12-40 pro and it's a fine lens but doesn't seem special. I occasionally wish I'd had my 17,1.8 or 25,1.4 even the 50,1.2 with me instead.
     
    Speedliner, Feb 4, 2016
    #20
Page 1 of 3
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...