1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Olympus 2.0x teleconverter up for pre-sale soon

Discussion in 'Micro 4/3 News and Rumors' started by Holoholo55, Jun 13, 2019.

  1. Holoholo55

    Holoholo55 Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Aug 13, 2014
    Honolulu, HI
    Walter
    • Informative Informative x 2
  2. At EUR450, let's hope it's a very good one.
     
  3. Carbonman

    Carbonman Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Jul 10, 2014
    Vancouver BC
    Graham
    I'll wait until I see some tests and user reports; I'm getting almost 17x magnification from my 300mm f4 and 1.4x TC. 24x at a maximum aperture of f8 would be less usable hand held. Heat shimmer is a factor in wildlife photography at long distances, too. This would really show it when you consider the typical long range of targets with this combo.
    With the 40-150mm f2.8 I'd end up with an 80-300mm f5.6. Hmmm, that has possibilities.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. Stanga

    Stanga Mu-43 Top Veteran

    905
    Oct 16, 2016
    For that sort of money you could get the Panasonic 100-300mm f4-5.6 instead.
     
  5. Carbonman

    Carbonman Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Jul 10, 2014
    Vancouver BC
    Graham
    True, but that's the entire bulk of an additional lens and probably not quite as sharp as the 40-150 Pro and 2x TC.
     
  6. whumber

    whumber Mu-43 Veteran

    439
    Jun 13, 2017
    I would actually expect the 100-300 to be sharper than the 40-150. The 40-150 already loses a large amount of resolution with the MC-14, it's not going to get any better with the MC-20.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. djtaylor7

    djtaylor7 Mu-43 Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    575
    Mar 2, 2013
    Nelson, NZ
    David
    Does this mean there will be a glut of 1.4x TCs on a certain auction site, I wonder?
     
  8. It's not worth selling the 1.4x, especially if you've got the 300mm. If I have a spare £400 and the 2x is any good, I will keep both.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  9. Carbonman

    Carbonman Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Jul 10, 2014
    Vancouver BC
    Graham
    The 40-150 Pro is really sharp at all focal lengths; I don't find noticeable degradation with the 1.4 TC at any focal length. Lenstip tests the 40-150 + 1.4TC at 48lpmm at f4/210mm, 52lpmm at f5.6/210mm. That's a favorable result compared to most m43 lenses.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. whumber

    whumber Mu-43 Veteran

    439
    Jun 13, 2017
    I'm surprised you interpret the Lenstip results as favorable for the combo, the 48lp/mm result is just barely at the "decency level" in lens tip terminology. They show around a 30% loss in resolution when attaching the teleconverter at f/4, compared to the bare lens at f/2.8, and nearly a 40% loss comparing them both stopped down by one stop which is pretty consistent with my experience. Compare that to something like the Canon 70-200 which only sees a ~5-12% reduction in resolution with a 1.4x TC attached and it doesn't look good at all.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. Carbonman

    Carbonman Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Jul 10, 2014
    Vancouver BC
    Graham
    I find my combination is quite sharp at all focal lengths and maintains good contrast. I've adjusted my camera focus settings with the 1.4TC mounted on both the 40-150 and 300. It would probably improve the Lenstip measurements by several lpmm across the board if they did the same.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  12. RAH

    RAH Mu-43 Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    658
    Dec 1, 2013
    New Hampshire
    Rich
    Other manufacturers' formats (e.g. Canon) have 1.4x and 2x TCs in their lineups and they seem to both thrive. Myself, I would never get a 2x because of the poor IQ, at least in my experience. I'm not all that crazy about how 1.4s perform, so a 2x would be out of the question.
     
  13. whumber

    whumber Mu-43 Veteran

    439
    Jun 13, 2017
    That's not very likely as they use manual focus for the test charts.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  14. S-Osolin

    S-Osolin Mu-43 Rookie

    10
    Feb 20, 2019
    I believe sharpness will be the decider here. A good 2x will open up a ton of possibilities.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  15. Lcrunyon

    Lcrunyon Mu-43 All-Pro Subscribing Member

    Jun 4, 2014
    Maryland
    Loren
    I am very dubious that I would find the MC-20 worth buying, both for the IQ degradation as well as feeling (for my shooting anyway) that µ4/3 doesn't really need that much extra reach. But, I'll keep an open mind.

    I agree with @whumber@whumber that the IQ degradation on the 40-150mm Pro and MC-14 combo is pretty severe. It works acceptably well when I use it to zoom-in on smaller birds at a closer distance, but at further distances, I don't find the images usable. That said, while I don't doubt the Lenstips findings, it's hard to say if I am even getting 48 lines per mm with my combo, so calibration is still a good idea. I don't even like using the MC-14 with the 300mm Pro, though it is better.

    I also don't think I would ever need that much reach with the 300mm Pro, and am far more interested in the 150-400mm Pro. As mentioned, air visibility becomes a factor at some point, so I try not to use a TC for getting further distance so much as filling the frame with smaller-sized birds.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. Baenwort

    Baenwort Mu-43 Regular

    84
    Aug 22, 2017
    Wisconsin, USA
    I'm hoping one of the early users will do a 40-150 + MC20 vs 75-300 vs 40-150 + DTC vs 100-300 on both a close and a far subject at 300mm.

    I presume there must be a benefit of using optical teleconverters or they wouldn't be made. It can't just be marketing fluff, even black out tape for shiny parts at least results in conveyance of a message about the car owner.
     
  17. tkbslc

    tkbslc Super Moderator

    Using currently available examples, here's Canon's $2000 latest model f2.8 telephoto with their newest $430 2x TC III stopped down losing to a $600 plastic Tamron at max aperture. So I would agree with you.

    Tamron 100-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di VC USD Lens Image Quality

    Now on the telephoto primes, vs a super-tele zoom, it is a different story:

    Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM C Lens Image Quality

    So maybe there's hope for 300mm f4 owners. But keep in mind you'll be at f8 wide open with a 2x TC, which is going to be rough outside of mid-day.
     
  18. Phocal

    Phocal Mu-43 Legend Subscribing Member

    Jan 3, 2014
    Houston
    Since my switch to Olympus I have been a big user of TCs. My main wildlife lens/setup for a very long time was the ZD 150mm f2.0 with the EC-14 and EC-20. My take on TC's is if you are using a high quality lens (not some cheap consumer zoom) they are worth using if you are printing. If you are just posting photos to the internet in most cases you are better off just cropping. But if you want to print and print large, the TC is worth using.

    Here are a few post I did.

    First is a comparison of the 150/2 vs the 300/4. In this one I shot the same subject with both lenses getting close to identical framing, moved much closer for the 150/2 shots - Shootout - Little Tuna vs Micro Tuna - A Look at Resolution

    This one is the 150/2 w/ EC-20 vs the 300/4 - Shootout - Lens Comparison - Olympus MZ 300mm f4.0 IS Pro & Olympus ZD 150mm f2.0 w/ EC-20

    Last is a shootout of my 300/4 vs 50-200 SWD w/ EC-14 vs MZ 75-300mm - Shootout - Olympus 75-300 vs 50-200 SWD w/ EC-14 vs 300/4 Shoot Out

    I will have to dig out the phots I shot of a bullfrog using the 150/2. In that session I shot the bullfrog from the same spot swapping out TC's and looked at cropping the 150/2 vs using the EC-14 and EC-20. In that one I determined for internet cropping was just as good but for printing the TC was better.

    my 2 copper pieces,

    Phocal
     
    • Informative Informative x 4
    • Agree Agree x 2
  19. Lcrunyon

    Lcrunyon Mu-43 All-Pro Subscribing Member

    Jun 4, 2014
    Maryland
    Loren
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.