Showcase Olympus 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ

rfortson

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
420
Location
Houston (Clear Lake), Texas
I guess no one has started this thread yet, so I'll do so. I just bought this lens to go on my E-P5. I wanted a compact lens for the Pen form-factor and this lens certainly fits that need. IQ is decent, the automatic lens cap is handy and the thin size is just what I was looking for. I've only had it a day so these are just a few quick snaps. I'll keep adding to it as I get better shots.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

P3170011 by fortsonre, on Flickr

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

P3170001 by fortsonre, on Flickr
 

jyc860923

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
3,067
Location
Shenyang, China
Real Name
贾一川
Thanks Russ

And thanks again for the full size on flickr, really helps us understanding a lens
 

rfortson

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
420
Location
Houston (Clear Lake), Texas
Finally got out and gave this lens a good workout, and I'm finding it works well for a kit lens. Size is (to me) the biggest advantage, as it's about the same size as the 17/2.8. Image quality is fine, though I'm not a pixel peeper. I did get a little CA on a couple of high contrast shots, but it cleans right up in LR. I previously had the original 14-42 from my E-P1 kit and one difference I (think I) see is that the original 14-42 seemed to focus much closer. I no longer have the original 14-42 (sold it with my E-P1), so I can't compare directly. Published specs say they're nearly the same, but it doesn't feel that way to me. Anyhoo...

Build quality is nice for a kit lens (somewhere between the original 14-42 and the 12-50, IMHO). Electronic zoom is fine for me, and the auto lens cap is very convenient. In short, it's exactly what I was hoping for when I bought it, and it will stay on my E-P5 as my go-to lens when just out and about. Of course, if I go with a subject in mind, I'll probably mount a prime on the camera as (to me) that's what the E-P5 really calls for.

So, here are a sample of my pictures from a local farmer's market and from Rocket Park at the Johnson Space Center.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

P3220097.jpg by fortsonre, on Flickr

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

P3220101.jpg by fortsonre, on Flickr

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

P3220063.jpg by fortsonre, on Flickr

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

P3220062.jpg by fortsonre, on Flickr

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

P3220061.jpg by fortsonre, on Flickr

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

P3220059.jpg by fortsonre, on Flickr

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

P3220056.jpg by fortsonre, on Flickr

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

P3220055.jpg by fortsonre, on Flickr

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

P3220050.jpg by fortsonre, on Flickr

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

P3220041.jpg by fortsonre, on Flickr

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

P3220039.jpg by fortsonre, on Flickr

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

P3220040.jpg by fortsonre, on Flickr
 

rfortson

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
420
Location
Houston (Clear Lake), Texas
How does this lens compared to the 12-50mm?
I don't pixel peep, but they seem comparable over the equivalent range. The 12-50 is weather sealed, has a "macro" function and has a wider range (both wider and longer). The negative is its size.

For me, I bought the 14-42 mainly for it's small size to go on my E-P5. For that, it works well.
 

MCMLXXIII AD

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
50
Location
London
Real Name
Mahesh
I had the kit lens with body too but returned for a body only package. I felt the kit lens wasn't good for me to make the most out of the camera.
 

DL Photo

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
216
Location
Richmond, BC, Canada
Real Name
Dave
Posted this on the E-M10 page as well. Thought this came out well. Pretty sharp for a kit lens.

<iframe src="https://www.flickr.com/photos/silverstrikers/13574301725/player/0d6120a2c0" height="708" width="1024" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen></iframe>
 

rfortson

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
420
Location
Houston (Clear Lake), Texas
With the E-P5 and the 14-42EZ. I find it pretty decent under the right conditions.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Cropped
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

Lurch

Hi, I'm a gear addict
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Messages
118
Location
Canberra, Australia
Real Name
Jason
I intend to add this shortly for the E-M5, again for size reasons.
Is there any 'tricks/tips' to using this lens? eg: f-stops that seem to be a sweet spot of anything?
 

DL Photo

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
216
Location
Richmond, BC, Canada
Real Name
Dave
I intend to add this shortly for the E-M5, again for size reasons.
Is there any 'tricks/tips' to using this lens? eg: f-stops that seem to be a sweet spot of anything?
I've had clear shots wide open and around f8. Only recommendation I have is that it needs good light for best shots (wow......some good advice).
Best kit lens that I have owned......even better than my dslr kit lenses.
I recommend the auto lens cap as well.
 

Dan43

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
50
Thanks for the thanks, rfortson and WendyK!

I'm a bit surprised about the high number of views... there must be a lot of interest in this lens...

Update: Seems like the high number of view was somehow caused by flicker's new html embedding...
 

dancebert

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jan 18, 2014
Messages
337
Location
Hua Hin, Thailand
My em10 came with the 14-42EZ. I expected that it would produce images OK for monitor viewing when used in or close to it's sweet spot. So far, so good. Nothing special asthetically about these images, I'm more interested in seeing what I can do with it.

<a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/98341917@N08/14390795344" title="">
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
"800" height="599" alt="
00273-768
"></a>

IQ dropped when cropped.

<a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/98341917@N08/14368730236" title="">
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
"800" height="486" alt="00273-cropA-768-80"></a>

f9.5 @ 125th, 42mm, ISO 400
 

silver92b

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Messages
1,031
Location
Atlanta, GA
EM5

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

Lawrence A.

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
1,713
Location
New Mexico
Real Name
Larry
Thanks for this thread,. The lens looks just fine for my purposes- to put on the E-M5 to take anywhere whenever I leave the house when I don't know if I'll be taking photos or not. Mine shipped today from B&H, so by Wednesday I hope to have pictures to posts.
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom