Review Olympus 14-150mm f/4-5.6 II

  • Thread starter Deleted member 20897
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 20897

Guest
Background
An all in one, affordable, weather sealed lens for micro four thirds? Interested?
This is the newest iteration of this "kit" lens by Olympus. The original was not weather sealed, so we have an upgrade there. Let's take a look at this lens.

12-21-2016_PENF_tests_PC210005.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

1/200, f/6.3, ISO 200 @ 58mm

Handling/Weight/Size
Relatively, for its range, the lens is just slightly smaller than the Olympus 12-40/2.8 PRO. It is smaller in diameter as well as length. It is very similar in size to the budget friendly Olympus 40-150/4-5.6R lens.

It is an f/4-5.6, which helps keep the size down. The lens does extend when zoomed. The zoom ring is smooth and responsive, the lens feels solidly built.

This is a great option for those times when only one camera/lens is wanted or the ability to change lenses (high dust environment or raining/inclement weather) is not possible. The weather sealing is a great thing to have when you need it.

The close focusing of this lens is welcome as well. You can get very close. It is not good enough to be a "macro" lens, but the close focusing capability will most likely satisfy a lot of photographers needs.

OI000013-01.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

1/500, f/4, ISO 200 @ 14mm

Image Quality
Let's make no qualms about it...this is not going to rival IQ from lenses such as the PRO line zooms. It does start at f/4, so you lose some ability to have a shallow depth of field like you would get with an f/2.8 zoom or the f/1.x primes.

What I planned on using this for was an all in one street shooting or every day carry lens.

The image quality did not hold up to what I wanted, just too many compromises for the range you are getting. I'll stick with the current setup I have which is 2 lenses, the Panasonic 12-32 and the Oly 40-150R.

I found that doing my part as a photographer, that I was able to get some shallow depth of field and that the transition and out of focus areas are quite pleasant. You can judge for yourself from the sample images, though.
Image quality seems best at wide to medium telephoto and suffers at the long end toward the 150mm mark.

All sample images taken with the Olympus PEN-F.

OI000017-01.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

1/200, f/5.6, ISO 200 @ 54mm

Auto Focus
As to be expected with modern Olympus built micro four thirds lenses, this is a quick focusing lens. You'll have no complaints from me on its S-AF performance.

12-21-2016_PENF_tests_PC210013-Edit.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

1/200, f/7.1, ISO 1250 @ 90mm

12-21-2016_PENF_tests_PC210008.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

1/320, f/5.6, ISO 200 @ 150mm

Bottom Line:
In a kit or at the current $399 price(as of 12-22-2016), this is a great everyday carry option when versatility or weather sealing are needed and budget is a concern. If you want something faster with better IQ but need the versatility, I'd look more to the 12-100/4 PRO lens.

It suffers most at the longer telephoto end in clarity. As stated previously, this is not a keeper lens for me and I'll stick with the 2 lens kit of the P12-32 and O40-150R.
 

mary

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Dec 13, 2018
Messages
241
squirrel.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
D

Deleted member 20897

Guest
Maybe some day I'll get lucky enough to be able to try another. I'd like nothing more than to have a competent super zoom. The version I had was just not good enough. Perhaps sample variation, perhaps I'm just being too strict.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Egregius V

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Jun 14, 2015
Messages
881
Location
Massachusetts, USA
Real Name
Rev. Gregory Vozzo
My 14-150 II is very sharp in the center, but can be weak away from the center toward the wide end - especially at 14mm. How weak seems to vary. Stopping down helps a bit - though I recommend avoiding apertures smaller than f/8 with this particular lens. Aberrations don't seem too bad to me. Used carefully, my copy is quite sharp across most of the frame, even at 150mm. My 40-150 R is sharper - in fact, it's sharp edge-to-edge. Still, I don't hesitate to use the superzoom when I'm in a hurry or want a sealed lens.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2018
Messages
1,423
Location
Somerset UK
Real Name
Steve
Maybe I don't expect as much as others from a lens, but mine has impressed me. I have a Pro lens and a couple of primes for comparison. Without doubt my weakest lens is the 12-42 kit lens.
 

mary

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Dec 13, 2018
Messages
241
I bought mine used at Adorama..$299.00 . I was amazed at the price and the quality of the lens coming from Nikon lenses..its a steal!
 

994

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
7,486
This is my experience with the mark I. At the longest end, it was softer than I wanted. Although...it worked for portraits! I found I prefer the P12-60kit. A solid all-around range, and WR.
 

mary

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Dec 13, 2018
Messages
241
In my experience stopping down the lens really sharpens it up..may not be ideal for portrait shooters looking for creamy bokeh but at 7.1 it really shines.
 

Thai-Mike

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 2, 2016
Messages
3,508
Location
Thailand
Real Name
Michael
Yesterday I got my Olympus 14-150mm f4-5.6 Mark II and I te4sted at night handheld. I thought, after reading reviews that Low-light pewrformance is not that good,
but I am amazed with it.

handheld-1.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

mfturner

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Aug 6, 2019
Messages
466
@mary I absolutely love your first reply, the squirrel made me smile.

I've only had this lens a few days, but already I think it will meet my goals, which was to get a lightweight weather sealed zoom with a range over 100mm for hiking (I'm more of a telephoto than a wide angle person).

My copy's center is sharp across the zoom range. The corners may need some help at the wide end below 20mm. Playing in rawtherapee, I can almost completely remove the CA in the corners with "defringe". It looks to me like the distortion correction may be smearing in the corners, I will play with that to see if I may be happier with more barrel distortion in the corners like I am with the 9mm BCL.

But overall I'm happy with it so far, it exceeds my expectations for a super zoom.
 

ac12

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
Apr 24, 2018
Messages
5,259
Location
SF Bay Area, California, USA
I recently picked up this lens, cuz I kept having second thoughts about it.

I had compared the P-Lumix 12-60 with the Olympus 14-150.
At that time, the P-Lumix 12-60 won.
- It was a bit smaller and lighter than the 14-150. I was coming from APS-C, and was trying to control "weight creep."
- I valued the 12mm wide end more than the 150mm long end. 18mm on an APS-C was not wide enough for me. I was used to using a 24 on 35mm film.

But, when using the 12-60, I sometimes ran into shots that made me think, "it would be nice to have the extra reach of the 14-150."
So I gave in and bought a refurb 14-150, so that I can actually use it, and determine for myself, which lens works better "for me."

Secondarily, I am trying to determine what my kit for my next vacation will be.
Either the P-Lumix 12-60 or Olympus 14-150 + Olympus 17/1.8. Trying to keep it down to two lenses.
I learned from my last vacation that, keeping the bulk and weight down really helped this old man make it through the trip, without being worn out from carrying a heavy kit.

I have the 12-100, but that lens is too heavy for me to use as a GP lens on a 2 week vacation.
So it has to be one of the non-pro lenses.
 

Groot

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Aug 4, 2022
Messages
101
Just ordered one myself, can't believe it was going for $399 back then.
 

Latest threads

Top Bottom