I'm tempted by Olympus' current price on the 40-150--$99 on the Olympus web site through this week. I'm considering snapping one up to use to photograph my son's soccer games. These are middle/high school games, so I can stand on the sideline and I think that 300mm equivalent focal length is usually OK. But should I just put that money into the 14-150 instead? It is only 3oz. heavier and has a great range for a walk-around lens. However I've heard that the 14-150 is a bit weak (soft, I assume) on the long end of its range, which might make it a lame sports lens. It might also be slower at focusing, which would make it pretty much useless. And, finally, is the 40-150 even good enough to capture good results at school soccer games? Thanks in advance for any input!