Still learning with my E-PL1 and this 100mm f/2.8 silvernose beauty... Street performer at the 2011 Adelaide Fringe Festival... {} View image in gallery
Okay, that makes sense :smile: Go to edit your post and select 'Go advanced'. That way you should be able to edit the title as well.
Just got this lens...Wow! I have tested it in the same way that I once tested a Canon 70-200 2.8L, on a Canon 50D, and can say that this is as good, if not better than that on my OM-D EM-5, this lens is sharp: {} {} {} {} {}
Thinking of getting a copy of this lens to share between my EM-5 and my OM-1 film camera. How does it perform wide open on MFT? M
The lens is very sharp wide open but would benefit from a hood at 2.8 to enhance contrast. It is a seriously good lens. I paid £62 for mine.
Some different subjects from my previous posts. I love this lens. Taken with OM-D at Edinburgh Festival Fringe 1. {} 2. {} 3. {} 4. {} 5. {} 6. {}
I may sell all my legacy lenses, but not this little one... <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/flubie/8139101415/" title="304/366 - Raoul Wallenberg Memorial by Flubie, on Flickr"> {} "601" height="800" alt="304/366 - Raoul Wallenberg Memorial"></a> <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/flubie/8035069732/" title="P1010574 by Flubie, on Flickr"> {} "800" height="600" alt="P1010574"></a> <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/flubie/8021296564/" title="P1010391 by Flubie, on Flickr"> {} "800" height="600" alt="P1010391"></a>
Recently entered club . Mine is MC version. Completely agree with fluberman, it would be the last one I part with if I were forced . F2.8 {} F2.8 {} F2.8 {} F2.8 {} F2.8 {} F2.8 {} F2.8 {}
Two recent pictures taken with this lens attached on GX1. <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/flubie/8273564072/" title="A fellow photographer by Flubie, on Flickr"> {} "601" height="800" alt="A fellow photographer"></a> <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/flubie/8272460899/" title="349/366 - Bubbles by Flubie, on Flickr"> {} "800" height="601" alt="349/366 - Bubbles"></a>
Nobody else wants to share ? Ok, I'll add one... Wide open, increase contrast a little bit and remove purple fringe in LR. Otherwise it's an SOOC jpeg. <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/flubie/8450323013/" title="Yes, I see you... where have you been? by Flubie, on Flickr"> {} "800" height="601" alt="Yes, I see you... where have you been?"></a> I'm wondering how this awesome lens compared to the Panasonic 35-100, at 100mm f2.8...
{} Miss Europe by Flubie, on Flickr {} Miss Oceania by Flubie, on Flickr {} Friendly chat (3) by Flubie, on Flickr {} Friendly chat (4) by Flubie, on Flickr
Loving this lens, battered MC version here! Crocus: {} (E-pl3, OM100mm and raynox dcr150) Blossom: {} (E-pl3, OM100mm) Quite heavy LR use here, it's not this contrasty The filter thread is damaged on mine but I just found the rubber outside of a 46mm screw in lens hood fits perfectly round the outside of the nose. I added a rubber band inside the hood to hold it in place, all snug and fits perfectly
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/flubie/8657942785/" title="Enjoying the day by Flubie, on Flickr"> {} "1024" height="768" alt="Enjoying the day"></a> <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/flubie/8657947925/" title="Texting by Flubie, on Flickr"> {} "1024" height="768" alt="Texting"></a> <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/flubie/8659055656/" title="Song for donation by Flubie, on Flickr"> {} "600" height="800" alt="Song for donation"></a>
I finally got one of these and an adapter after the influence of this thread. I probably paid too much, but it was in minty condition. I love that it's not too big and the focus ring feels great. I noticed it's easy to move the aperture ring accidentally and is different to what I'm used to. {} {}
