Oly lens is perfect for nature photography!

Bushboy

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Apr 22, 2018
Messages
2,600
I snapped this closely related nocturnal species sneaking through the undergrowth...
6252AD07-0D37-4E56-9945-E5432034A336.jpeg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Last edited:

PhotoCal

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2020
Messages
392
I never put my lenses vertical with the contacts down. The contacts are a weak point.
I store my lenses with the front element down. If the hood can be reversed it is. If not, it's removed.
And with the cap on in a lens pouch, at least. On a shelf with a lip so it's nearly impossible for them to fall over or roll off.

Placing lenses with the element down is also a good habit to help speed up lens changes that require more than two hands.
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
1,275
Location
Central California Sierra Foothills
I never put my lenses vertical with the contacts down. The contacts are a weak point.
I store my lenses with the front element down. If the hood can be reversed it is. If not, it's removed.
And with the cap on in a lens pouch, at least. On a shelf with a lip so it's nearly impossible for them to fall over or roll off.

Placing lenses with the element down is also a good habit to help speed up lens changes that require more than two hands.


The contacts won't touch anything with the rear lens cap on!
BTW - does this have anything to do with the O.P.?
 

PhotoCal

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2020
Messages
392

The contacts won't touch anything with the rear lens cap on!
BTW - does this have anything to do with the O.P.?

Yes, the rear lens cap protects the contacts from dirt.
However, the rear lens cap does not protect the contacts from compression due to the weight of the lens resting on the contacts.

And we know that contacts need to protrude to some extent in order to work properly. Why take a chance by putting all of the weight of a lens on its most vulnerable spot?

I'm sure your response will mention that lenses aren't heavy, etc.

You're free to do whatever you want. It's your money.
 

Phocal

God
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Messages
6,732
Location
Mars
Yes, the rear lens cap protects the contacts from dirt.
However, the rear lens cap does not protect the contacts from compression due to the weight of the lens resting on the contacts.

And we know that contacts need to protrude to some extent in order to work properly. Why take a chance by putting all of the weight of a lens on its most vulnerable spot?

I'm sure your response will mention that lenses aren't heavy, etc.

You're free to do whatever you want. It's your money.

Actually, you are wrong.

https://flic.kr/p/2kJwPK8
https://flic.kr/p/2kJwjpD
 
Last edited:

Hendrik

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 27, 2015
Messages
2,355
Location
Wayland MA
Real Name
Hendrik
Yes, the rear lens cap protects the contacts from dirt.
However, the rear lens cap does not protect the contacts from compression due to the weight of the lens resting on the contacts.

And we know that contacts need to protrude to some extent in order to work properly. Why take a chance by putting all of the weight of a lens on its most vulnerable spot?

I'm sure your response will mention that lenses aren't heavy, etc.

You're free to do whatever you want. It's your money.
You can prove to yourself that this is a misperception by inspecting the inside of the lens foot cover. If contact were being made with the bitter end of the lens or its contacts, there would be scrape marks. I have found none across all my OM, m43 and F-mount covers. Clean as a whistle, every one. The designers thought of that failure mode a long, long time ago.
 

Latest threads

Top Bottom