1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Oly 9-18mm vs Tokina 11-16mm

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by ronbot, Aug 17, 2011.

  1. ronbot

    ronbot Mu-43 Regular

    98
    Apr 27, 2010
    Not really a scientific comparison but just got the 9-18mm and my dad has the Tokina.

    attachment.php?attachmentid=5233&stc=1&d=1313565084.
    - on E-PL2 and T1i side by side

    attachment.php?attachmentid=5234&stc=1&d=1313565084.
    - Tokina @ 11mm

    attachment.php?attachmentid=5235&d=1313565084.
    - Oly @ 9mm

    attachment.php?attachmentid=5236&d=1313565084.
    - Sample of Oly

    As you can see, in terms of horizontal angle of view, the Tokina is very slightly wider since it is equivalent to 17.6mm (with a Canon crop factor of 1.6x); that's only 0.4mm wider! It would've been wider on other mounts, like Nikon and Sony.

    Vertically, however, the Oly is even a bit wider (or taller) because of the 4/3 aspect ratio.

    Then there's the size and weight difference where the Oly 9-18mm is just obsurdly puny for something that covers 18-36 equiv.

    However, the Tokina is fast at constant f/2.8 and is very robust as the barrel is metal. Also, you can slide the focus ring forward to enable MF and back to enable AF - nice!

    Tokina is really good especially for the price and makes the 700USD retail price of the 9-18mm seem like a rip-off in comparison. Fortunately, I got the Oly for a good price locally (from Bestbuy of all places because it was an 'open item' but looks new and is complete). The 9-18mm is my second favorite lens right now (after the 20/1.7). Do I even want/need the 12/2.0 anymore?

    attachment.php?attachmentid=5237&d=1313568218.
     

    Attached Files:

    • Like Like x 3
  2. Danny_Two

    Danny_Two Mu-43 Regular

    182
    Oct 30, 2010
    London
    I've always been in two minds over the 9-18. Sometime I hate the distortion, but then sometime I love it and photo's from other lenses look flat in comparison.
    Im still in two minds whether to sell it or not, id love someone to do a back to back test against the 12mm.
     
  3. nickthetasmaniac

    nickthetasmaniac Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jan 11, 2011
    If Pentax had released a sealed DA* version of the 11-16/f2.8 (like they did with the 12-24/16-50/50-135) I honestly doubt I would have ever come to Four Thirds land...

    Oh well :smile:
     
  4. pxpaulx

    pxpaulx Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jan 19, 2010
    Midwest
    Paul
    I've never done a direct comparison like this with my Pentax gear - I'm quite surprised to see the amount of additional height to the image at 9mm compared to 11mm. Granted at such wide angles the canon's 1.6x crop probably also plays a pretty big part compared to 1.5x on other aps-c cameras, but it is still good to see visually, thanks for the post!
     
  5. joele

    joele Mu-43 Regular

    163
    Dec 12, 2010
    Melbourne, Australia
    I didn't think the 12-24mm was sealed either :confused: 


    Back to the OT, yeah the 9-18mm is a great little lens, far from perfect but pound for pound (so to speak) it is a wonder and I have no regrets buying it.. The 12/2 interests me but I don't think I will go there, the 9-18 is good enough..
     
  6. pxpaulx

    pxpaulx Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jan 19, 2010
    Midwest
    Paul
    The 12-24 pentax version is not sealed, you're correct. If the 11-16mm f2.8 was released in a pentax version I would have expected it to be a sealed DA* version though (in line with the 16-50 and 50-135).

    I loved the 9-18mm, had it for about half last year. I've gone primes, and every time I think about the 9-18mm, I remember I have the Pentax 15mm ltd, my favorite lens of all time! Smaller then the 9-18mm, built like a tank and a perfect 22.5mm equiv focal length :)  yes, perfect!
     
  7. joele

    joele Mu-43 Regular

    163
    Dec 12, 2010
    Melbourne, Australia
    mmm maybe I got bad sample but my 15/4 just never impressed me.. In regards to optical performance that is, size and general build of the lens was very nice..

    Wouldn't surprise me if I just got a bad sample, I bought a terrible new (made in vietnam) FA 31 that was far worse than my friends older (Japan) sample.. One of the reasons I left Pentax, jusst bad luck with bad samples of lenses (16-50 comes to mind too)..
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.