Oly 40-150 v Oly 14-150?

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by ZimBushBoy, Nov 27, 2013.

  1. ZimBushBoy

    ZimBushBoy New to Mu-43

    Nov 27, 2013
    Cambridge, UK
    I'm considering buying a small telephoto and would welcome some advice on the difference between these two lenses. There's a small difference in their respective focal ranges & a massive difference in price. Does anyone have any information on the quality of their results? (or anything else that is relevant)

    All advice appreciated by a naive buyer of lenses.
  2. M4/3

    M4/3 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    Sep 24, 2011
    Optically I believe the lens reviews have reported the 40-150 is a tad sharper. And it's very compact and lightweight. I personally enjoy using the 12-50 mm zoom + the 40-150mm zoom. Then I have the wide angle of the 12mm + super macro capability + power zooming over the 12-50 range which is handy for shooting video. But if hauling around two lenses is awkward for you then the 14-150 would be a good choice.
  3. I think there's quite a big difference in how you would use the two lenses. The 14-150 is a 'do anything' lens, while the 40-150 is purely a telephoto. This means that in normal use, you'll be swapping lenses with the 40-150, for subjects that need a wider view.

    The question of sharpness is quite interesting. If you look at the test results on SLRgear, the 14-150 definitely shows up as being softer at the long end, particularly at the edges. However, I've tested both lenses and for the examples I have, the 14-150 is at least as sharp as the 40-150 over most of its range. It's also sharper than the kit 14-42 most of the time.

    The 14-150 is quite a bit more expensive, of course, but for me the convenience of never having to change lenses when I'm not on a dedicated photo excursion is worth it.
  4. I own both lenses, I quite enjoy using the 40-150mm and I've gotten some quite nice photos in the 40-100mm range but it gets a little soft as you get closer to 150mm.

    OTOH I've never quite come to terms with the 14-150, for some reason the results I get with it seem to be errr umm uninspiring. I really should get rid of it and use the money for something else.
  5. bigal1000

    bigal1000 Mu-43 Veteran

    Sep 10, 2010
    New Hampshire
    The 40-150 IIR is the best bang for your buck of any lens out there,I use it all the time and the good part I bought it from a guy on Ebay from a kit purchase he did not want it and I got it for $95 a steal.
  6. LeeOsenton

    LeeOsenton Mu-43 Button Clicker

    Jun 25, 2010
    Hayes, Virginia, U.S.A.
    Lee Osenton
    The current Olympus discount on the 40-150mm makes it $119. I just got a silver one with free shipping.


    Sent from my iPhone using Mu-43
  7. mf100

    mf100 Mu-43 Regular

    Aug 26, 2012
    Sawbridgeworth, England
    Personally I'd go for the 14-150mm. If you're out and about anywhere when dust is an issue this avoids changing lenses and risking dust on the sensor. On a few holidays in Greece I could have really done with this lens.
  8. ZimBushBoy

    ZimBushBoy New to Mu-43

    Nov 27, 2013
    Cambridge, UK
    Thanks fellas; really insightful comments. it looks like it comes down to versatility of having a single all purpose lens (14-150) or a telephoto.

  9. dav1dz

    dav1dz Mu-43 Top Veteran

    Nov 6, 2012
    What else do you have for lenses?
  10. Andym72

    Andym72 Mu-43 Veteran

    Mar 4, 2013
    Reading, UK
    I concur.

    If you think you'll be in situation where you'll be switching between wide and tele a lot and lens swapping would mean missing the shot or getting dirt in the camera, get the 14-150. The other upside is it is sharper than the 14-42 II in their shared region.

    The 40-140 has less CA, is sharper, lighter and cheaper.

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.