1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Oly 12-40mm vs PL 12-60mm f/2.8-4

Discussion in 'This or That? (MFT only)' started by RyanM, May 14, 2019.

  1. RyanM

    RyanM Mu-43 Veteran

    380
    Jun 16, 2017
    Some context: I'm thinking about adding a standard zoom to my primarily prime-based kit. I shoot on an Olympus body, so Dual IS considerations are not a factor.

    The way I figure, if I want portability or widest aperture, I'll shoot using my primes. So, all other things being equal, it makes sense to me to prioritize focal length flexibility (the major advantage of zooms over primes) for my zoom. This would lead me to think the 12-60 would be the way to go. (for that matter the 12-100mm f/4 would probably be great, but it's a bridge too far IMO in both price and size/weight). My question: are all other things equal? E.g. sharpness, weather-sealing quality, build quality, etc.

    Essentially, I'm looking for a standard zoom with the widest possible focal length range that's never slower than f/4 and doesn't compromise on optical quality. Is that the 12-40 or the 12-60?

    Can anyone who's tried out both lenses speak to how they compare? Or for those who haven't tried both, why did you choose one over the other?

    Thanks.
     
  2. barry13

    barry13 Mu-43.com Editor Subscribing Member

    Mar 7, 2014
    Southern California
    Barry
    They're probably both fine optically.
    The Pana zooms turn the opposite direction from Oly, which would probably bother me a lot.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Ranger Rick

    Ranger Rick Mu-43 Veteran Subscribing Member

    463
    Apr 11, 2009
    Tempe, AZ
    Rick
    I've used both (the PanaLeica version), and I think they are quite comparable, esp. in terms of IQ. The variable aperture doesn't bother me, but for some it might. The PanaLeica has I.S. with Panasonic bodies (dual I.S. on certain bodies); the Oly doesn't have any. The Oly has the manual focus clutch, which is nice, and an extra function body on the lens.

    I wound up preferring the PanaLeica because of the extra reach, more of a "one lens" solution. Based on the criteria you outlined, I think the PanaLeica would be a good fit.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Appreciate Appreciate x 1
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.