Noktor Hyperprime 50/f0.95 is in stock now.

Streetshooter

Administrator Emeritus
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
5,138
Location
Phila, Pa USA
Thanks for posting this. Personally, I think they are nuts to bring out a 50mm lens.
Myself, I would hardly ever use a 100mm FL.
If it were a 25mm, maybe but to start with that...we'll see.

Are you getting one Sabesh?
 

sabesh

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
356
Location
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Thanks for posting this. Personally, I think they are nuts to bring out a 50mm lens.
Myself, I would hardly ever use a 100mm FL.
If it were a 25mm, maybe but to start with that...we'll see.

Are you getting one Sabesh?
Nope, as I agree with you. I'd be interested in a 35mm (or less) version, provided that it's light. I had the CV 35/1.2 and sold it off due to the weight. I'm somewhat happy with the Konica 40/1.8 right now, but would love a f/1.0 version, lol.
 

Jamus

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
131
Real Name
Peter Jamus
I know nothing about Noktor... is it sharp? What's the quality like?
 

TimA

Mu-43 Rookie
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
17
Location
Cleveland, though I go to Japan waaaay too often f
It is pretty sharp once stopped down but that's now that you use this lens for right? :)

Steve Huff did a good review of this lens. The background blur on this baby at f/0.95 is busy...and odd with a 3/4 moon ovals. Very low contrast as well and you will DEFINITELY have to do some major post processing. BUT the effect is pretty neat if you use it well.

Here's an example of a shot wide wide open.

http://www.timarai.com/images/pad2010/20100506-01.jpg">

Manual focus is a bit of a pain. It's definitely a specialty lens. But I think I'll have fun with it :)
 

Jamus

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
131
Real Name
Peter Jamus
Yeah, I think what throws me off from wanting it is that it becomes a 100mm lens. Now if it were a 35/24mm, I'd be interested.
 

pasterw

New to Mu-43
Joined
May 8, 2010
Messages
3
Location
Oxford
What puts me off is that it's a TV lens and never was intended for photography use.

Wolfgang
 

Streetshooter

Administrator Emeritus
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
5,138
Location
Phila, Pa USA
Well, there's a lot of lenses that are like that, that are making great images with this format. Hopefully they will wake up and make something useful for us......
 

Jamus

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
131
Real Name
Peter Jamus
Beautiful shot, Tim... I'd love to see more.
Especially interested in seeing some portraits.
 

PeterB666

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
780
Location
Tura Beach, Australia
Real Name
Peter
Image quality is pretty good for the speed & price. Nothing really competes on the value side of things. If you don't need/want the speed then look elsewhere.

Vignetting doesn't seem too bad wide open which is a real surprise and the bokeh seems good.

Is it just my memory, or have they jacked up the price by $50 since the first lot were pre-ordered?
 

Jonas B

Guest
Joined
Apr 23, 2010
Messages
91
Location
Gothenburg, Sweden
NOKTOR - Ultra Fast Lenses - Products
Native lens? Just wondering... to me this is an adapted lens.

Image quality is pretty good for the speed & price. Nothing really competes on the value side of things. If you don't need/want the speed then look elsewhere.

Vignetting doesn't seem too bad wide open which is a real surprise and the bokeh seems good.
I would definitely save for a little longer and get a Nokton. Bokeh is good??? Peter, doesn't that just go to show that "good bokeh" means absolutely nothing?
I'm not looking for another Noktor bokeh discussion, I just smiled reading your claim and came to think of the word bokeh, and what it means to different photographers.

regards,

Jonas
 

kevinparis

Cantankerous Scotsman
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
3,912
Location
Gent, Belgium
Just a little experiment - here are four 50mm lenses shot wide open. One is a very expensive lens, one cost me 200 euros, another around 100 euros and another cost 75 euros including a SLR body

none of these lenses are as 'fast' as the noktor, but there are three different maximum apertures on display. I offer these picture really so people can actually begin to see what an extra half stop or so actually gets you.

All shot from around 1m - no pp done at all


If you are nice I will tell you which is which later

Kevin
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

Bokeh Diem

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Mar 14, 2010
Messages
655
Location
Toronto
A and B look to be the fastest.. a lot of control and horsepower there. But for the difference in price A to D, I'll take the 75 Euro lens please.

Bokeh D
 

stickan1

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Messages
34
Location
Sweden
My guess is that C is the most expensive one, more sharpness and contrast. But you have a very good point as the differences are subtle.
 

Vidar

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
545
Location
Bergen, Norway
I think this shows that all those lenses are capable to take a decent picture of some jeans... Maybe even Noktor, the lens I thought this thread is about, could take a good picture of those jeans?:confused:
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom