No post-rocessing?

Discussion in 'Open Discussion' started by OzRay, Jul 15, 2014.

  1. OzRay

    OzRay Mu-43 Legend

    Jan 29, 2010
    South Gippsland, Australia
    Ray, not Oz
    http://petapixel.com/2014/07/15/breathtaking-wedding-photographs-make-great-case-eloping-iceland/

    As Benny Hill so eloquently put it:

    benny-hill-evlenmeden-olmaz.
     
  2. agentlossing

    agentlossing Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Jun 26, 2013
    Andrew Lossing
    Uh huh. Good thing the world is naturally filtered through Kodak Gold 200, huh?
     
  3. Replytoken

    Replytoken Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    May 7, 2012
    Puget Sound
    Ken
    I suspect that he also eats canned fresh fruit as well.

    --Ken
     
    • Like Like x 2
  4. bassman

    bassman Mu-43 Top Veteran

    680
    Apr 22, 2013
    New Jersey
    Scott
    I guess he never actually post-processed (I.e. developed and printed) his film, either.
     
  5. Fri13

    Fri13 Mu-43 Veteran

    353
    Jan 30, 2014
    Dont know why but those look so edited that..... It takes almost hard to believe...
     
  6. Just Jim

    Just Jim Mu-43 Top Veteran

    941
    Oct 20, 2011
    I never realized that heavy vignettes happened in nature... couple must be very blessed indeed. I think he means that, "I don't do heavy processing on my own, but if it's the plug in that does the work, it's not on me"
     
  7. agentlossing

    agentlossing Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Jun 26, 2013
    Andrew Lossing
    Wow, I hadn't even clicked the link. Those look almost lomo. No post processing, indeed.
    GX1•17/2.8•30/2.8
     
  8. bassman

    bassman Mu-43 Top Veteran

    680
    Apr 22, 2013
    New Jersey
    Scott
    You really have to ignore any claim of "no post processing", since there is no possibility of seeing the photons that hit the sensors without it. Anyone making such a claim is either ignorant or a lier.

    The pictures themselves are stunning.