to say the least!
BenQ SW2700PT.
When I fired it up and loaded some JPG photos I just downloaded from my camera, I was absolutely astonished at the detail and colors I saw. Vastly different than either my desktop or my laptop monitors. The default display color space is AdobeRBG. I can switch to sRBG, but still, the colors and detail were FAR better than what I was used to. It makes me wonder, what do other people see when I send/post my photos? I'm wondering should I go back and review some of my processed images and if they will need re-tweaking? What I saw (ooc jpg images) was almost too much, and I think it is because I set my camera (Lumix G9) to either Vivd or Scenic for landscapes because I thought it rendered the colors better. I just switched that back to Natural from here on. But I do have RAW files to work with.
Funny thing is, If I look at an image on say my laptop monitor, It looks fine, but side by side with the BenQ, there is no comparison.
I really don't know how to ask the right question, but for those of you that use a similar type monitor for photo processing, what color space do you use to view your images aRGB or sRGB?
Which provides the best results for you?
Because I am working with a monitor that shows so much more color and detail, how will a processed image translate to someone else who has a more generic monitor?
What I worry is that most of my images could be a bit over processed because I had a 'more generic monitor" until now?
For my photos, I shoot landscapes and nature primarily, and I like my images to pop, but not to an excessive level. I don't like to add any kind of artificial elements, but I do want to enhance details/colors so the viewer can see what I saw.
Hope this makes at least some shred of sense, and I appreciate your comments.
BenQ SW2700PT.
When I fired it up and loaded some JPG photos I just downloaded from my camera, I was absolutely astonished at the detail and colors I saw. Vastly different than either my desktop or my laptop monitors. The default display color space is AdobeRBG. I can switch to sRBG, but still, the colors and detail were FAR better than what I was used to. It makes me wonder, what do other people see when I send/post my photos? I'm wondering should I go back and review some of my processed images and if they will need re-tweaking? What I saw (ooc jpg images) was almost too much, and I think it is because I set my camera (Lumix G9) to either Vivd or Scenic for landscapes because I thought it rendered the colors better. I just switched that back to Natural from here on. But I do have RAW files to work with.
Funny thing is, If I look at an image on say my laptop monitor, It looks fine, but side by side with the BenQ, there is no comparison.
I really don't know how to ask the right question, but for those of you that use a similar type monitor for photo processing, what color space do you use to view your images aRGB or sRGB?
Which provides the best results for you?
Because I am working with a monitor that shows so much more color and detail, how will a processed image translate to someone else who has a more generic monitor?
What I worry is that most of my images could be a bit over processed because I had a 'more generic monitor" until now?
For my photos, I shoot landscapes and nature primarily, and I like my images to pop, but not to an excessive level. I don't like to add any kind of artificial elements, but I do want to enhance details/colors so the viewer can see what I saw.
Hope this makes at least some shred of sense, and I appreciate your comments.