I just bought a Olympus E-P5 with kit 17mm f/1.8 and put in a order for the 45 f/1.8 as well. I came from shooting a NEX-6 + Zeiss 24 and a RX1 for the last 8 months, so I'm used to shooting in the 35mm FOV. I'll feel right at home with the 17 and I heard that the 45 is sharp and relatively cheap. So I have two options A) Panasonic Leica 25 f/1.4 used for around $500 + Olympus 60 Macro for $400 = $900 or B) Panasonic 12-35 for $900 used in mint condition Eventually whichever option I don't go for now, I will most likely end up with towards the end of the year. I'm leaning towards B because of the flexibility and I think I have the low light requirements with the 17 and 45 being 1.8, but this is my first m4/3 so if the 1 additional stop that much different? I used to shoot with a 24-70 when I had a Nikon FF, so I'm used to the zoom range. I don't do too much macro but looking to get into it but I figure the 60 is sharp and it can double as a longer portrait if I needed. Plus I have a 2 week vacation planned overseas to Asia in October. Thoughts?