New E-P5 with 17 and 45, should I get the 25 + 60 or the 12-35?

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by jpark1982, Aug 13, 2013.

  1. jpark1982

    jpark1982 Mu-43 Regular

    57
    Aug 3, 2013
    I just bought a Olympus E-P5 with kit 17mm f/1.8 and put in a order for the 45 f/1.8 as well. I came from shooting a NEX-6 + Zeiss 24 and a RX1 for the last 8 months, so I'm used to shooting in the 35mm FOV. I'll feel right at home with the 17 and I heard that the 45 is sharp and relatively cheap. So I have two options

    A) Panasonic Leica 25 f/1.4 used for around $500 + Olympus 60 Macro for $400 = $900

    or

    B) Panasonic 12-35 for $900 used in mint condition

    Eventually whichever option I don't go for now, I will most likely end up with towards the end of the year. I'm leaning towards B because of the flexibility and I think I have the low light requirements with the 17 and 45 being 1.8, but this is my first m4/3 so if the 1 additional stop that much different?

    I used to shoot with a 24-70 when I had a Nikon FF, so I'm used to the zoom range. I don't do too much macro but looking to get into it but I figure the 60 is sharp and it can double as a longer portrait if I needed. Plus I have a 2 week vacation planned overseas to Asia in October. Thoughts?
     
  2. krugorg

    krugorg Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Jul 18, 2011
    Minnesota USA
    How much are you shooting macro? You could also consider picking up the 25/1.4 along with the cheaper 12-50 zoom, if you mostly shoot primes and non-macro.

    I have not had a chance to try the 17/1.8, but I also really like the focal length. There is something special about the PL25, though, especially using it wide open for portraits. Pretty sharp center @1.4 and pleasing colors, I think.
     
  3. Wisertime

    Wisertime Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Aug 6, 2013
    Philly
    Steve
    The PL 25 is special. Kind of a must have. The 60mm macro is on sale now and I just got one this week too. The 45 rocks too. If I was you, I'd pick up a used 45 if you want one bad enough. Unless you do Macro, the 45 will prob suit you fine.

    Can't comment on the 12-35...guess it depends what you shoot mostly. I lust for the 75mm, but can't justify it now.
     
  4. huai

    huai Mu-43 Regular

    77
    May 24, 2013
    I'd shoot the 17 and 45 for a couple of months and figure out your needs after that. 17+45 covers you for portraits and street photography.

    What will the 25, 60Macro, or 12-35 enable you to shoot that you can't shoot now (and that you actually have a need to shoot on a regular basis)? Once you can answer that question you'll know what else you need.

    Don't spend $3500 on a bag full of gear before you figure out your shooting style. Enjoy what you have.
     
  5. jpark1982

    jpark1982 Mu-43 Regular

    57
    Aug 3, 2013
    Thanks for the feedback. I'm going to go with the PL25 for now and roll with a 3 lens bag for the time being. I shoot some but not a ton of macro (flowers, food) but will hold off. I was thinking about it because the $100 sale is supposed to be over on the 17th but I should still be able to get a good deal on it even after the sale.
     
  6. mh2000

    mh2000 Mu-43 Veteran

    254
    Jul 3, 2010
    17, 25 and 45 would do me pretty good forever. :)
     
  7. brianb032

    brianb032 Mu-43 Veteran

    217
    Jan 10, 2011
    N.Carolina
    Too bad you can't say the same about bodies. That's almost an unending rabbit hole.
     
  8. jpark1982

    jpark1982 Mu-43 Regular

    57
    Aug 3, 2013
    I'm looking forward to it. Just picked up the 25 on Amazon from the Warehouse Deals for $483 in like new condition. Nice that is has a 30 day return policy as well.

    17, 25, and 45. 35 for street and a length I'm very comfortable with. 50 for lower light and general, and 90 for portraits.

    I'll hold off on any other lenses.
     
  9. Mr Hahn

    Mr Hahn Mu-43 Veteran

    260
    Jul 9, 2010
    SLC, Utah
    Nate
    I love the 75mm prime and I leave it on my camera all the time. On the other hand I haven't really bonded with my 25mm. I'm always wanting a little more or a little less lens, so I'm going to replace it with the 12-35mm instead of buying a couple more primes to go around it.
     
  10. Anthonys

    Anthonys Mu-43 Regular

    167
    Nov 17, 2011
    Sydney
    Anthony
    I think I would have leant towards option B but that us because I prefer wider angles, although my guess is the 25 won't offer much over the 17 unless you make large prints or really want the background blur look? With a bit of cropping on the 17 you could save carrying an extra lens? Interested to hear what situations you've found it useful?

    I'm looking at the PL25 vs the 12-35 and from my research looks like the 12-35 is almost as sharp. Plus it has OIS so better for video and low light still shots. Combined with the flexibility of a zoom feels like its almost like carrying a set of primes. The only reason I'm still thinking PL25 is for it's lovely shallow DoF, and size/cost advantage. Though if you add the 12mm it works out more expensive!
     
  11. jpark1982

    jpark1982 Mu-43 Regular

    57
    Aug 3, 2013
    My reasoning for the PL over the zoom is because right now I take a lot of pictures indoors since my daughter is still young and spends most of the time inside and need the low light. When I was shooting with the NEX, the Zeiss 1.8 stayed on my camera, anything lower than 1.8 boosted the ISO up too high.

    When she gets a little older and we start taking her outside more often, I'm sure then I'll pick up the 12-35 for simplicity when I don't want to carry the primes.
     
  12. DynaSport

    DynaSport Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Jan 5, 2013
    Dan
    The 17, 25, 45, 75 is pretty much my dream kit. Saying that, the 12-35 and 35-100 holds an attraction for me as well, because there are times that zooms are just so handy. On my dslr kit, I found I bonded much more with good quality zooms than I did primes, but maybe I just didn't have the right primes.

    If I was rich, I'd buy both sets and see which I actually ended up using. As it is, I have to make choices and hope they are the right ones.
     
  13. zap

    zap Mu-43 Veteran

    215
    Jul 23, 2012
    uk
    how about 12 and 75 for wider-angle and further reach? or 12 and 60 for the macro...
     
  14. Anthonys

    Anthonys Mu-43 Regular

    167
    Nov 17, 2011
    Sydney
    Anthony
    What are you using now? You can also try the best of both worlds:

    17, 25 and 35-100

    or

    12-35, 45, 75

    ? :cool:
     
  15. DynaSport

    DynaSport Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Jan 5, 2013
    Dan
    You're just trying to confuse me.

    As to what I am using now, I have the O14-42 II and 40-150. Obviously I'm on a budget. But I will add over time and honestly, I have really enjoyed both those lenses. Especially the 40-150.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.