1. Reminder: Please user our affiliate links to get to your favorite stores for holiday shopping!

Need Telephoto Advice

Discussion in 'Adapted Lenses' started by ahuyevshi, Mar 2, 2010.

  1. ahuyevshi

    ahuyevshi Mu-43 Veteran

    454
    Feb 9, 2010
    Berkeley, CA
    Has anyone used the Canon FD 200mm 2.8??? I have a motorcycle event this weekend that I'm shooting for some friends.. Would love to see how well the pen competes with the 5D
     
  2. thearne3

    thearne3 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    807
    Jan 28, 2010
    Redding, CT USA
    Not sure what you're asking - handling? hand holding a 400mm (equiv) lens? Focusing? Canon in particular?

    My 2 cents:

    I have the Hexanon 200mm f4, so I can only address a few points. At 400mm equiv., focusing can be challenging - meaning there is no such think as 'quick' - shots must be anticipated and pre-focused. Bright conditions will help, of course. In normal daylight the screen was plenty bright even at f4 - your f2.8, so much the better.

    I also have the 135mm f3.2, which I prefer to the 200mm. The image shake when hand holding at 200mm is pretty high! Others have noted that a minimum shutter speed at that FL is critical - for me that means 1/300 or more.

    Sorry if this is not what you were looking for...still just my 2 cents. :thumbup:
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. ahuyevshi

    ahuyevshi Mu-43 Veteran

    454
    Feb 9, 2010
    Berkeley, CA
    More along the lines if someone has the 200 2.8... I am pretty confident in handholding it, as it weighs nothing compared to what the Sigma 120-300 2.8 weighed... Best practice for long lenses is 2xfocal... So I'm sure I can bump up the ISO to get a 1/400
     
  4. hodad66

    hodad66 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    806
    Jan 27, 2010
    Indialantic, Florida
  5. ahuyevshi

    ahuyevshi Mu-43 Veteran

    454
    Feb 9, 2010
    Berkeley, CA
    worth $180????
     
  6. benoly

    benoly Mu-43 Regular

    38
    Feb 23, 2010
    California, USA
    A 400 2.8 for $180???:2thumbs: You could always sell it later. If you put on a body stabilized cam you might be able to keep the ISO down.
     
  7. benoly

    benoly Mu-43 Regular

    38
    Feb 23, 2010
    California, USA
    I have an Oly OM adapter for my 50 1.8, so I've been considering the OM 100 & 200 2.8 OR stick with AF & get the Pany 45-200...
     
  8. ahuyevshi

    ahuyevshi Mu-43 Veteran

    454
    Feb 9, 2010
    Berkeley, CA

    E-P2 for the win :)
     
  9. hodad66

    hodad66 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    806
    Jan 27, 2010
    Indialantic, Florida
    the newer model has internal focusing so the barrel
    doesn't elongate as you focus. That's the one that
    I got. INFO HERE