My impressions with Olympus 40-150 2.8 PRO and E-M1

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by noncho, Nov 20, 2014.

  1. noncho

    noncho Mu-43 Rookie

    18
    Nov 20, 2014
    Hi all,

    I had one weekend with Olympus 40-150 2.8 PRO, 1.4x converter MC-14 and E-M1.
    I really wanted to check how good is that combination in action shooting (official football game) and I have also made some portraits, macro and street.

    1416346897_PB170856_.

    Here are my impressions - http://www.nonchoiliev.com/blog/2183


    This small review is a good reason to start posting here, I hope it will be helpful :smile:
     
    • Like Like x 21
  2. hodad66

    hodad66 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    806
    Jan 27, 2010
    Indialantic, Florida
    Thanks for the review!!!
     
  3. Aqualung

    Aqualung Mu-43 Veteran Subscribing Member

    290
    Jan 10, 2013
    Central Mass
    Chris
    Very encouraging...
     
  4. zulfur666

    zulfur666 Mu-43 Veteran

    254
    Jan 30, 2014
    great set of photos, very impressive. thanks for sharing your thoughts and welcome to the mu43 forum.
     
  5. OzRay

    OzRay Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Jan 29, 2010
    South Gippsland, Australia
    Ray, not Oz
    So what did you think of the combination?
     
  6. noncho

    noncho Mu-43 Rookie

    18
    Nov 20, 2014
    Thank you all!
    I really like telephoto lenses and 40-150 2.8 is one of the most impressive which I have ever tried. The reach is very useful, the optics are excellent, it feels great for hand-held shooting with E-M1. The combination is very fast and responsive.
    I'm very curious about the expected 300/4 - with E-M1 might be amazing light combo for birds and other super telephoto needs :)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. Aniseedvan

    Aniseedvan Mu-43 Regular

    175
    Sep 25, 2011
    Northants,uk
    Another thank you - really encouraging to see some low light sharp shots of sports.
     
  8. gobeatty

    gobeatty Mu-43 Regular

    82
    Sep 15, 2014
    Do you know what iso and noise reduction (if any) was used in the soccer shots? The out of focus bleachers look a mess to me. Similar in the full length portrait.
     
  9. barry13

    barry13 Super Moderator; Photon Wrangler Subscribing Member

    Mar 7, 2014
    Southern California
    Barry
    The EXIF in the image above shows ISO 2500.

    Barry
     
  10. noncho

    noncho Mu-43 Rookie

    18
    Nov 20, 2014
    The information about image settings and ISO is in the review :)
     
  11. OzRay

    OzRay Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Jan 29, 2010
    South Gippsland, Australia
    Ray, not Oz
    And one more thread that could detail more in the forum than simply referring members to a blog.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. noncho

    noncho Mu-43 Rookie

    18
    Nov 20, 2014
    OzRay,

    You are right about that, but gobeatty looks like he was there and I have even bold that "JPEG from the camera with no noise reduction and sharpness -1" :)

    Btw,
    I have also noticed the busy background in some of the pictures, especially if it's not at 150mm.
    PB160802__.

    Here is one full body at 150/2.8, where the background is better:
    http://www.nonchoiliev.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/PB160820.jpg
     
    • Like Like x 2
  13. gobeatty

    gobeatty Mu-43 Regular

    82
    Sep 15, 2014
    Ok - not bad at all for iso 3200 and no NR. Apologies for missing the camera setting notes.
     
  14. nstelemark

    nstelemark Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    May 28, 2013
    Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
    Larry
    I was really hoping for better performance against busy backgrounds. This is one scenario where the 150F2 is significantly better than the 50-200, and I was hoping the 40-150 would be better than this.
     
  15. minibokeh

    minibokeh Guest

    This may be a worst case, but definitely not happy with the rendering of background out of focus areas in those test shots (M.40-150mm F2.8 with MC-14):

    <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/101667287@N08/15467726374" title="141223-130346 by Moritz Berger, on Flickr"> View attachment 399804 "1000" height="768" alt="141223-130346"></a>

    <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/101667287@N08/15467726404" title="141223-130059 by Moritz Berger, on Flickr"> View attachment 399805 "1024" height="768" alt="141223-130059"></a>

    <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/101667287@N08/15902603458" title="141223-125928 by Moritz Berger, on Flickr"> View attachment 399806 "1024" height="768" alt="141223-125928"></a>
     
  16. minibokeh

    minibokeh Guest

    here is what "best in class bokeh" looks like (same camera, OM-D E-M1, but with Zeiss Makro Planar 100mm)
    <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/101667287@N08/15904411927" title="141223-135355 by Moritz Berger, on Flickr"> View attachment 399807 "1024" height="732" alt="141223-135355"></a>
     
  17. Turbofrog

    Turbofrog Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Mar 21, 2014
    While the robin shots definitely have a nervous edge to them that isn't very pleasing, I actually quite like the background in the model shot with the stump. It provides nice context and still has good separation, whereas the wall of blur in the 150/2.8 full body shot is pretty blah to me.
     
  18. Santa just brought mine yesterday and I had limited time to shoot with it. I am still trying to figure out how to post pics here but, what I can say it is a damn impressive lens. I know some don't like the size but, compared to my 70-200 VRII on my D800 its a piece of cake and quite honestly I don't feel its weight or size is an impediment. I gave it a quick try , attempting to shoot some hummingbirds today and when I got the subject focused the results were quite impressive. Shooting flying hummingbirds with a narrow DOF isn't a high winner rate even with the D800 but, it does do a better job catching the little buggers but, when my OMD e5 gets them with this lens it is awesome. Expensive for m4/3rds but, to me this lens filled a gap that needed to be done.

    https://ppcdn.500px.org/93563441/08f24ba12de1a39e0e898eb4086eaa9f3e6e25cf/3.jpg?v=5
     
  19. minibokeh

    minibokeh Guest

    Besides the meh-bokeh, I like much of the other characteristic of this lens. Specifically pleased that as expected I'm shooting a lot beyond 100mm, which was one of the reasons to get the Olympus next to the 35-100 f/2.8 Panasonic that I already had.

    This picture is taken at 130mm, f/2.8, 1/160", ISO 200, E-M1:
    <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/101667287@N08/16082538326" title="141225-204009_DxO by Moritz Berger, on Flickr"> View attachment 400100 "768" height="1024" alt="141225-204009_DxO"></a>
    Notable torture test shooting a subject with "halo flash" from behind.
     
  20. CPTKILLER

    CPTKILLER Mu-43 Regular

    49
    Dec 8, 2014
    Austin, Texas USA
    Jim Phipps
    Sharp piece of glass.

    Also excellent work.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.