My Full Frame is Film

cedge

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
95
Location
Dorset, UK

Attachments

  • 50897342221_94262ae492_c.jpg
    50897342221_94262ae492_c.jpg
    222.4 KB · Views: 13

Arundo Donax

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Messages
700
Nikon FM2n, Nikkor 35mm f/1.4
Delta 100
FM2_D100_2_2021_0006.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

felipegeek

Mu-43 Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
361
Location
New York, NY
Real Name
Felipe
2020 Manhattan, NYC. Some accidental double exposure shots having loaded the same roll of film twice into the camera spread out by a month or two's time in between.

Shot with Rolleimat F a simple zone focus point and shoot. I think the film was Tri-X developed in Cinestill Df96. Scanned with Epson 3170 using Epson Scan software.
 

Attachments

  • 2020-Film-EpsonScan109.jpg
    2020-Film-EpsonScan109.jpg
    522.2 KB · Views: 13
  • 2020-Film-EpsonScan112.jpg
    2020-Film-EpsonScan112.jpg
    647.8 KB · Views: 16
  • 2020-Film-EpsonScan114.jpg
    2020-Film-EpsonScan114.jpg
    422.1 KB · Views: 14
  • 2020-Film-EpsonScan135.jpg
    2020-Film-EpsonScan135.jpg
    435 KB · Views: 12

agentlossing

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
4,804
Location
Oregon USA
Real Name
Andrew Lossing
Did not know that BW400CN could be developed in a BW film developer since it was designed for C-41 color process. I have a roll of it sitting around but I've only used Cinestill Df96 Monobath so far for various BW films. Will have to do some research on that.
You can probably develop it in DF96, I just wanted to try it in Rodinal 1:100 because it's a compensating developer. I didn't know whether 400CN needed any special handling being developed in something other than C41.

Adox Rodinal can be had from B&H or Adorama very inexpensively and can be shipped domestically. Then all you need is a fixer, also quite cheap. Rodinal is a great complementary alternative to DF96 since the latter has a rather short shelf life and the former has an extremely long shelf life.
 

agentlossing

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
4,804
Location
Oregon USA
Real Name
Andrew Lossing
Fomapan 100, developed in rodinal 1:50 (I'm thinking I like 1:50 better with this film than the 1:100 semi stand I was trying previously).

Untitled (39).jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

ex machina

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Messages
2,514
Location
Baltimore, MD
More scans of prints I made 40+ years ago, processed in my high school and community college darkrooms. Probably a mix of Tri-X and HP5, pretty sure the first and fifth are HP5. Went back and looked at some of the negatives, #1, #4, and #7 are TRI-X, #3 is HP5. My whole world is shaken because for 40 years I was sure that the fireman shot was HP5...

51014076858_ac90d9a52a_b.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Uncle Bobby by Lewis Francis, on Flickr

51014803386_b1a036b4f2_b.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Vanessa Higginbotham by Lewis Francis, on Flickr

51014077333_4daa1081eb_b.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

The Yopp Kids by Lewis Francis, on Flickr

51014891572_1a0d6e44bc_b.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Fireman by Lewis Francis, on Flickr

51014891862_e640c6ac20_b.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Cynthia by Lewis Francis, on Flickr

51014077733_27ec452c21_b.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Tim Thornton in the Taylor's garage by Lewis Francis, on Flickr

51014078883_f96aec867b_b.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Scan 18-Edit by Lewis Francis, on Flickr
 
Last edited:

Shortsonfire79

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
201
Location
Bay Area, California
Tried my hand at home development. Was super easy and I saved myself ~$60 (three rolls of 135 and three rolls of 120)! I don't really shoot bw so I only did C41 for now. Trying to wrap up three rolls of bw before I consider doing that home dev myself. The last one shared here is lab dev'd E6.

50911702148_49aaeb3814_b.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Shrooms on a Log by shortsonfire79, on Flickr

50912517892_3c615f7fed_b.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Round Top by shortsonfire79, on Flickr

50978535837_8ed3a16ab7_b.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

210220 Firefall, E100 by shortsonfire79, on Flickr
 

Brownie

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 3, 2018
Messages
3,454
Location
SE Michigan
Real Name
Tim
Tried my hand at home development. Was super easy and I saved myself ~$60 (three rolls of 135 and three rolls of 120)! I don't really shoot bw so I only did C41 for now. Trying to wrap up three rolls of bw before I consider doing that home dev myself. The last one shared here is lab dev'd E6.

View attachment 877472
Shrooms on a Log by shortsonfire79, on Flickr

View attachment 877473
Round Top by shortsonfire79, on Flickr

View attachment 877474
210220 Firefall, E100 by shortsonfire79, on Flickr
Nicely done. I went the other way and am doing B&W first. I want to exhaust the liter of DF96 Monobath I have before I try color so it doesn't go bad on the shelf. Which chemicals did you use? I think I'm going to go with Cinestill C41.
 

ex machina

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Messages
2,514
Location
Baltimore, MD
Couple more 40+ year old shots, this time scanned from the negatives, shot with a Canon AE-1 and Tri-X. First was a Canon ƒ4 200mm, second was a Canon ƒ1.8 50mm.

51026499493_acd96f69cb_b.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Grandpa Joe by Lewis Francis, on Flickr

51027229641_dfabf7cc5d_b.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Grandpa Joe by Lewis Francis, on Flickr
 
Last edited:

Shortsonfire79

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
201
Location
Bay Area, California
Nicely done. I went the other way and am doing B&W first. I want to exhaust the liter of DF96 Monobath I have before I try color so it doesn't go bad on the shelf. Which chemicals did you use? I think I'm going to go with Cinestill C41.

Yeah a lot of people do BW first. I hear it's easier but C41 was preeeety simple. I also don't tend to shoot BW.

Went with the Cinestill Cs41 kit; it's what my friend who lent me all the gear already had and no longer shoots film. Bought a couple more at a recent $5 sale.
 

ex machina

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Messages
2,514
Location
Baltimore, MD
Yeah a lot of people do BW first. I hear it's easier but C41 was preeeety simple. I also don't tend to shoot BW.

Went with the Cinestill Cs41 kit; it's what my friend who lent me all the gear already had and no longer shoots film. Bought a couple more at a recent $5 sale.

Huh, read little bit about the Cinestill kit:

If you already process your own black and white film, with this kit, there is no reason not to process C-41 color negative film at home as well! It is specially formulated without compromise for modern color films, not requiring a stabilizer bath. Modern emulsions were designed so that one-hour photo labs wouldn't need haz-mat training for formaldehyde, and have built-in dye stabilizers and hardeners that are released through this simplified 2-bath process. You can have beautifully developed, bleached and fixed color negatives, ready to scan or print. All you need is water, a thermometer and any simple tank and reel system!
It does look pretty simple, still have to nail the developer temp but after that you should be golden. It didn't use to be this simple, did it? Or maybe it just became more complicated in the printing stage? I seem to remember Cibachrome being the "easy" color processing solutions back in the day...
 

Brownie

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 3, 2018
Messages
3,454
Location
SE Michigan
Real Name
Tim
Huh, read little bit about the Cinestill kit:

If you already process your own black and white film, with this kit, there is no reason not to process C-41 color negative film at home as well! It is specially formulated without compromise for modern color films, not requiring a stabilizer bath. Modern emulsions were designed so that one-hour photo labs wouldn't need haz-mat training for formaldehyde, and have built-in dye stabilizers and hardeners that are released through this simplified 2-bath process. You can have beautifully developed, bleached and fixed color negatives, ready to scan or print. All you need is water, a thermometer and any simple tank and reel system!
It does look pretty simple, still have to nail the developer temp but after that you should be golden. It didn't use to be this simple, did it? Or maybe it just became more complicated in the printing stage? I seem to remember Cibachrome being the "easy" color processing solutions back in the day...
Santa, being the nice guy that he is, brought me a Sous Vide machine for Christmas. This was for the sole purpose of film developing.
 

Gromit

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Mar 27, 2017
Messages
807
Location
Lincoln UK
Real Name
Richard
The old peri-track at RAF Wellingore (closed in Aug 1945).

Hasselblad 500CM/Zeiss Planar T* 80-2.8/HP5+ at ISO 800

0-7.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Forum GIFs powered by GIPHY: https://giphy.com/
Copyright © Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom