Hi all, Ever since I came back to looking at mu4/3 (last time I had been looking at this maybe a yearish ago, the GF1+20mm combo was $900 at cheapest!!), I've been pondering whether it'd be a good decision to move over. Right now, I'm using a used A100 and an LX3. My reason for picking Alpha over Canikon, etc, a while ago was that the Minolta lenses go for very cheap yet deliver great performance, even though they don't have the absolute newest technology. But, I've been a little disappointed with the size and performance of the system; the LX3 isn't really pant-pocketable, and of course the DSLR isn't either, and I wasn't super impressed by the A100's high ISO performance, although that isn't a big issue. ...I'm rambling. So, I was considering moving to S90/95 (seems a LOT smaller) and possibly an mu4/3, which would either be the G1 or the GF1/EPL1/EP1/EP2 depending on what sort of deals I will find. I most definitely plan on getting the 20/1.7, and some legacy lenses, hopefully some decent pancakes. My quibbles with the G1: is it really worth switching from Alpha, since I already have the Alpha gear, size-wise and performance wise? It's also harder to get quality AF lenses than on the Alpha format. My quibbles with more compact mu4/3: how do they perform with legacy lenses? How much size am I saving, really, since they're not pant-pocketable anyways? Is it worth the compromise? I probably won't be purchasing the EVF's for these cameras, at least not now, since they aren't super cheap and only the VF2 seems to be worth buying. Any potential problems with the S95 either? Thanks a ton!