Most used lens

OzRay

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
4,991
Location
South Gippsland, Australia
Real Name
Ray, not Oz
I think there was some form of discussion on this some time back, but since starting my blog, I've been using photos taken over the last 10 years to illustrate various topics. As I keep all of my used photos in one folder, it was very easy to use Exposure Plot: http://www.vandel.nl/exposureplot.html, to analyse all the photos and see what were my most used focal lengths, f stops, ISO and aperture for all of those photos. The result was very informative (all the focal length figures are in 35mm terms):

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


It's pretty evident that primes lenses aren't for me.
 

alex66

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Jul 23, 2010
Messages
1,464
I had to look in to Lightroom for this year and the 12-32mm is the most used lens followed by the 45mm but as I effectively swapped the 20mm out for the Oly 25mm those two are around the same usage together as the 12-32.
 

OzRay

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
4,991
Location
South Gippsland, Australia
Real Name
Ray, not Oz
With prime lenses, you're kind of locked into what you use; but when you have a zoom, it provides some interesting stats as to what range you tend to use most frequently. If I'd had the 12-40mm, I'm pretty sure that the 12mm would have featured more in my chart. But the 12-40mm range is certainly where I work the most and no, I'm not going to get the 12-14mm f2.8 lens, as there's no way I'd get rid of the 14-35mm f2.
 

biomed

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
2,636
Location
Seattle area
Real Name
Mike
My lens use has varied somewhat. It used to be split between the 20/1.7 and 14-45mm/3.5-5.6 about four years ago. After acquiring the 25/1.4 it became the dominate lens. For the last four and a half months the 12-35/2.8 and 35-100/2.8 zooms have been used the most with the 25/1.4 being a close second. I always tend to use ISO 200 and an aperture of f/5.6. The shutter speed is set to what ever is deemed necessary. I tend to use my GX7 manually (focus and exposure) for the majority of the time. The rest of my u4/3 lens collection is still used on occasion. I still use some of my older Nikon glass. Modern zooms perform well and keep you ready to shoot with minimal lens changes.
 

LowriderS10

Monkey with a camera.
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
2,482
Location
Canada
Do you have any idea why Exposure Plot refuses to read the focal length off my OM-D E-M5?

I have the newest version (1.1.6)...it's really baffling...it reads all other info from the OM-D, and all info (including FLs) from my other cameras.
 

OzRay

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
4,991
Location
South Gippsland, Australia
Real Name
Ray, not Oz
Do you have any idea why Exposure Plot refuses to read the focal length off my OM-D E-M5?

I have the newest version (1.1.6)...it's really baffling...it reads all other info from the OM-D, and all info (including FLs) from my other cameras.
Are you trying to get it to read RAW or JPG conversions? It only reads JPG. You also need to go to the lens length page and change the equivalence factor from standard to 1 = 2.
 

Delb0y

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Aug 31, 2014
Messages
99
It's the 20mm 1.7 for me, by far. It makes the G3 so compact and easy to cart around.
 

drd1135

Zen Snapshooter
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Messages
6,015
Location
Southwest Virginia
Real Name
Steve
It's interesting that you hit 28 and 70 a lot because of the zoom. I wonder if you had a 24-80 if those would stick out, i.e., I wonder what you curve would look like if you didn't hit the end points of the zoom. I'm also surprised how often you were wide open.
 

tosvus

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Jan 4, 2014
Messages
643
Well, this tells me that someone needs to come out with a 12-35 f2 or faster for m43. I typically get primes because I find the zooms too slow. I would be happy if Panasonic could come up with a lens similar to the one in the LX100 that is very fast on the wide-end.
 

Narnian

Nobody in particular ...
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
1,465
Location
Richmond, VA
Real Name
Richard Elliott
"Unknown" is the lens leader far and away for me thanks to adapted lenses. ;)

Mine are mostly spread across the spectrum but if I factor in time things change. I did a lot of adapted lenses early on and the only Panny lenses I had for a while were the 14-45 and 45-200. I have stopped using all of those lenses a couple of years ago as I got native lenses and If I compare them the last two years it comes out roughly:

Samyang 7.5 - 2%
Oly 9-18 - 13%
Panny 14 - 19%
Panny 20 - 30%
Oly 45 - 18%
Oly 60 - 12%
Oly 75 - 3%
Panny 45-175 - 2%
Tokina 300 - <1%

I was surprised the 75 was so low.

BUT when I go places I tend to take my "light" kit which is one GX1 body and 3 lenses, the 14, 20 and 45. And the 20 is mounted first so it is the one that is often used by default. The 9-18 and 60 get used a lot when I go hiking.
 

kinlau

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
950
On m43, the 20/1.7 by far. But I did spend a couple years shooting with a 400/5.6 only.
 

OzRay

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
4,991
Location
South Gippsland, Australia
Real Name
Ray, not Oz
It's interesting that you hit 28 and 70 a lot because of the zoom. I wonder if you had a 24-80 if those would stick out, i.e., I wonder what you curve would look like if you didn't hit the end points of the zoom. I'm also surprised how often you were wide open.
If I had the 12-40mm, I'm pretty certain that the chart would widen out to include the wider and longer ends. It's the range where I prefer to shoot, except when I want to go real wide with the 7-14mm. I think the other issue is that I don't really like changing lenses a lot when I'm trying to cover many things at once, or working in more confined areas. I guess that's why I will never be a prime lens shooter, as it would slow me down tremendously. This style of working I guess comes from my news days. There are a lot more shot in the 35-100mm (70-200mm) range as well, but it doesn't look like I've used as many of those shots in the blog.
 

LowriderS10

Monkey with a camera.
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
2,482
Location
Canada
Are you trying to get it to read RAW or JPG conversions? It only reads JPG. You also need to go to the lens length page and change the equivalence factor from standard to 1 = 2.
Yeah, I have both RAW and JPEG files (everything is shot in JPEG with the better ones being shot in both). I did not know about the equivalence standard, thanks...I just always saw the "35mm equivalent" tag on the top and thought that's it...when I'm back from work I"ll check it out. Thanks! :)
 
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,397
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Real Name
Nic
That is a very useful little program!

From about 1900 images processed so far from the year 2013, most of which were taken while travelling. Cameras used were Micro 4/3, Samsung NX (APS-C) and a Canon G1X. Top two lenses used were the PL 25mm f1.4 and Samsung 30mm f2

 

Ramsey

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Jan 9, 2013
Messages
745
Location
Zagreb, Croatia
14-35mm f2.
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Sorry for using this cliche gif, but just by looking at f stop and most used FL charts, it seemed very appropriate for the situation. ;)
 
Top Bottom