Moss, moss, moss...

[archaeopteryx]

Epiphytic 168 stack around 1.3x. I think Plagiothecium laetum but don't have the confidence level to call an identification. Partly because this individual is incompletely rehydrated, which complicates inspection of leaf margins.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[archaeopteryx]

A sidewalk crack moss at 7.1x with the UPlanFL that's been amusing people lately. If one wishes to think of this as a form of high resolution photography along the image axis, it's a 1.01 GB data capture yielding 2376 frames in 15 substacks (stacked with Picolay, aligned by Hugin, post in GIMP, working size on disk is 2.03 GB). Subject size of the image is 2.44 x 1.83 mm, so the "big" stem on the right is about a millimetre in diameter.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

100% crop of the leaf cells for @Joris.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[Bushboy]

I was stunned slightly when I saw the microscope objective attached to your lens. Very clever, and I’m sure people thought it was make believe. How is it attached? Is it real?

 

[archaeopteryx]

How is it attached?

It's attached with a 46 mm to RMS thread (0.800"-36, so named because Royal Microscopical Society boffins made it a microscope objective standard in 1858) step down ring from Joy's Optics. Most objectives use RMS so stepping rings are easy to source, though 46 mm anything tends to be trickier than 52+ mm.

Is it real?

I've not heard of anyone faking microscope objectives, though presumably it's been done. If my copy's a fake whoever did it also copied its near apochromaticity and ability to resolve submicron structures, so I think I don't care. At my nominal upper limit of 9.4x the subject size of pixels in 4k videos from post focus on Panasonic's 16 MP sensors is 500 nm. At 7.1x it's 633 nm, though both are below the objective's 520 nm lateral Abbe resolution of 867 nm. Not much on that scale here, though. Counting pixels and estimating angles suggests the leaf cells above are around 7 um thick. The smaller grit particles from the sidewalk are around 15 um.

I linked the Olympus product page for the UPLFN objectives in the other thread but here it is again. Used 10x UPlanFLs are commonly available on eBay at reasonable prices, though sellers seldom specifically indicate UPLFN10X2. There are various competitive 10x infinity metallurgic objectives, the other one currently in production by Olympus being the 10x LMPlanFL (LMPLNFL).

This is the initial subslab of what was going to be a 9.4x stack of an epiphytic moss, Metaneckera menziesii. Got too "windy" to continue with the others since it doesn't take much air pressure to shift a tripod a few tens of microns.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[Joris]

100% crop of the leaf cells for @Joris.
View attachment 780233

Thank you, great work !

 

[jimr.pdx]

Irish tribbles, fresh off our roof. GX7 and ZD 35/3.5 macro.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[Harvey Melvin Richards]

Pretending to be moss, see post below.
EM127084-1 by Harvey Richards, on Flickr

 

[archaeopteryx]

Hi Harvey, are you sure that's moss rather than a moss gall from Diplolepis rosae or a similar wasp? Looking at full resolution on flickr I'm not seeing structures which look like the desiccated, spirally arranged leaves which would be expected of a moss colony. (Also, the mosses I know all dessicate to yellow-green, dark brown, or black rather than light brown.)

For comparison, here's a quick (handheld, not focus stacked, and low-ish magnification) snap of a couple of the branch colonies across the street from work.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Irish tribbles, fresh off our roof.

Not sure these are moss colonies either. Would need more pixels to tell if they're something else or just really pushing setae.

 

[Harvey Melvin Richards]

Hi Harvey, are you sure that's moss rather than a moss gall from Diplolepis rosae or a similar wasp? Looking at full resolution on flickr I'm not seeing structures which look like the desiccated, spirally arranged leaves which would be expected of a moss colony. (Also, the mosses I know all dessicate to yellow-green, dark brown, or black rather than light brown.)

For comparison, here's a quick (handheld, not focus stacked, and low-ish magnification) snap of a couple of the branch colonies across the street from work.
View attachment 788924

Not sure these are moss colonies either. Would need more pixels to tell if they're something else or just really pushing setae.

You are correct, the growth is on a rose hip.

 

[archaeopteryx]

Some wet lithophytes on concrete which proved more colourful than at first glance. 170 stack @ 1.3x.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[archaeopteryx]

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

55 stack at 1x.

 

[archaeopteryx]

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

169 stack around 0.4x. More about this one in another thread.

 

[Harvey Melvin Richards]

Are those dew drops on the filaments?

 

[archaeopteryx]

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Started out with 1912 images from 13 brackets at 9.4x but used only 347 of them. At 100% the chloroplasts are visible. Perhaps eventually I'll be able to afford a 20x or 50x objective.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Are those dew drops on the filaments?

Dew or captured fog. Hard to tell at that colony's particular location, though from the perspective of maintaining exohydry it's kind of an ambiguous distinction.

 

[archaeopteryx]

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

106 stack at 1.8x.

 

[ToxicTabasco]

Is Moss Landing a place with moss? I did not see any of the forest type moss like in most pics. But, there was some swamp moss. Here's some video of the Moss Landing shot with a MFT camera.
Moss Landing & low light test

 

[archaeopteryx]

Moss Landing & low light test

For those disinclined to watch videos this is a self-promotional link to a Panasonic G9 autofocus evaluation relevant to Ralf's animal detect thread but unrelated to this thread. The halophytic mosses Bryum capilare and Didymodon rigidulus might be present adjacent to Moss Landing in Elkhorn Slough but are not shown in the video and are absent from the local species list (Elkhorn is usually described as an estuary rather than a swamp, consistent with its limited number of trees, and Moss Landing gets its name from a wealthy man rather than a botanical source).

I suppose it's time for me to note this thread's posting recommendations again.

 

[archaeopteryx]

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Back on topic, a 157 stack at 3.9x.

 

[archaeopteryx]

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

274 stack illustrating exohydric retention, 4.7x. I suspect this might be developing Rhytidiadelphus but not sure.

 

[ToxicTabasco]

For those disinclined to watch videos this is a self-promotional link to a Panasonic G9 autofocus evaluation relevant to Ralf's animal detect thread but unrelated to this thread. The halophytic mosses Bryum capilare and Didymodon rigidulus might be present adjacent to Moss Landing in Elkhorn Slough but are not shown in the video and are absent from the local species list (Elkhorn is usually described as an estuary rather than a swamp, consistent with its limited number of trees, and Moss Landing gets its name from a wealthy man rather than a botanical source).

I suppose it's time for me to note this thread's posting recommendations again.

Thanks for that info. I did some online prep before going out. And the info you have is a great addition.