Micro 4/3 Holy Trinity

JensM

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Mar 6, 2016
Messages
624
Location
Oslo(ish), Norway
Real Name
As screename
If I could pick freely and top shelf, I would have the 12-35, 35-100 and the new 100-400 Panasonic. It would probably cover about 99,3 or more of all my photographic needs and still be a reasonable small package.
 

thegimprider

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Jun 12, 2016
Messages
78
Real Name
Douglas Coulter
7-14 2.8 Pro- 1.7 20mm- 45-200mm 4-5.6 is my current tarnished trinity. Due to budget issues I'm weighing a pro zoom in the 30-200 zone vs a high quality super zoom like the Panny that tops out at 400mm. Unless wills me some big glass I'm not getting top end telephoto prime over 150mm. I'd love that Oly 300mm but size and weight still mean it would spent lots of time at home. I can zoom by moving the camera in mid range so that 20mm is nice. Kit lens is sloppy so it gathers dust. A prime 8 or 9mm pro ultra wide would be nice incentive to leave my boat anchor pro ultra wide zoom at home but right now it is my favorite lens
 

sabesh

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
356
Location
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
My Terrific Triad:

Panasonic 15/1.7
Olympus 25/1.8
Panasonic 42.5/1.2 Nocticron

All 3 have good image quality and short MFDs (in relation to their FLs), which suits my style of photography.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
 

pdk42

One of the "Eh?" team
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
6,555
Location
Leamington Spa, UK
I'm lucky enough to have two "trinity" outfits:

Zooms: Panasonic trio of 7-14, 12-35 and 35-100. A bit big but ideal when travelling and max flexibility needed
Primes: Olympus trio of 12, 25 and 45. Wonderfully compact and cute. Great with an E-M5 or E-M10. What u43 is all about IMHO. Add a 75 for the lux option!
 

geert

Mu-43 Rookie
Joined
Aug 3, 2016
Messages
10
Holy trinity : is "big bag" citytrip : 9-18mm, 45mm and 45-200mm (that I hardly ever use) ( and a little table tripod Novoflex)

( plain duality suits me more ( one in the pocket, one on the camera) 15mm and 45mm, but that was not the question ;) )
 

6x6

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Oct 12, 2011
Messages
173
Myself, I am down to a duality:
1,8/17 or 1,7/20 mm at the one end, 1,8/45 or 2,8/60 at the other
 

geert

Mu-43 Rookie
Joined
Aug 3, 2016
Messages
10
Myself, I am down to a duality:
1,8/17 or 1,7/20 mm at the one end, 1,8/45 or 2,8/60 at the other
agreed : duality is easy ( or binair 0/1) bit wide, or bit tele ?
for me : GM5 with 15mm and 45 : very small ( poor viewfinder ), hiking
or : Olympus om10 with 9-18 and 60 : ( better viewfinder, more reach, bigger), city
 

astrostl

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Oct 4, 2014
Messages
538
Location
St. Louis, MO
Real Name
Justin Honold
My current three-plus-one: Voigtlander 17.5/0.95, Voigtlander 25/0.95, Panasonic 42.5/1.2, Olympus 75/1.8.

I'd consider dropping one of the Voigtlanders for the Rokinon 7.5/3.5. Probably the 25, since I can usually walk up but can't always walk away?
 

agentlossing

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
4,145
Real Name
Andrew Lossing
The price of the PL 15mm f1.7 keeps sticking to my craw, and it's the last piece I would consider in my 'perfect' trinity, which would be 15mm, 20mm f1.7 or 25mm f1.8 (depending on how tight I want my "normal" option) and Sigma 60mm. No medium telephoto, but I feel that when I want tele I want real tele.

oh and um...
 

deacon

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Jul 7, 2015
Messages
91
Real Name
Deacon
I've whittled my kit down to three lenses I cant give up:

Rokinon 7.5 f3.5 - for work (documenting buildings and spaces)
PL 15 f1.7 - for videos and group/action shots of my 1 and 3 year olds
P 42.5 f1.7 - for photos of kiddos
 

n3eg

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Jun 12, 2013
Messages
140
Location
Somewhere west of where you are
For my E-PL5: 14-42 II R, 40-150, and 75-300 kit lenses.
For my GM1: 12-32, Pentax Auto 110 f/2.8 20-40mm (actually measured closer to f/2), and Pentax Auto 110 24mm f/2.8
For my S-1: 12-45mm, 42.5-160mm, and Vemar f/2.8 135mm

Many more in my collection...
 

svenkarma

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Feb 5, 2013
Messages
581
Real Name
mark evans
I now have a right trinity of lenses, native, semi-native, and adapted.

(1) P 12-35/2.8. With the proviso that if it balances on your camera the O 12-40 is slightly the better lens.

(2) 4/3 Oly 40-150 f4-5.6. Never occurred to me to buy a kit telephoto zoom till I saw this in a shop window for £29. Ended up on a brief holiday with it as my only lens and was surprised by how versatile it was. The m43 version looks very similar.

(3) Oly PenF 38/1.8.

Cue rant. If the original PenF is such an iconic half-frame camera that Olympus have successfully digitally repackaged it, why oh why didn't they release an equivalent of the half-frame lens that went with the original? The camera wouldn't have become iconic without it after all.

I've got a Voigtlander BessaR, which has 4 viewfinder settings, 35 50 75 and 90. Natively we have 2 at 35, 3 at 50, 2 at 90 - 4 if you throw in the 42.5s - but nothing at all at 75, the choice they made for the PenF.

:scratchinghead:
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom