1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Macro option with epl-1 and panny 45-200

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by shoturtle, Nov 7, 2010.

  1. shoturtle

    shoturtle  

    823
    Oct 15, 2010
    Here is another low cost option for macro if you have a zoom. These were taken with an epl-1 with the panny 45-200mm and canon 500D close up lens. I put a step up ring from 52 to 58 as I use the lens with my canon lenses.

    The first shot is the watch, the second at f8, and the third at f5.6. All tripod shots. Not bad for a 80 investment. The single point 14x box did a nice job of getting critical focus.
     
  2. jimr.pdx

    jimr.pdx Mu-43 Veteran

    342
    Dec 5, 2010
    near Longview ~1hr from PDX
    Jim R
    Panasonic makes an LC55 lens for this purpose; I saw some great shots with it on the 45-200 elsewhere. Think I'll find a use for my 52-55 step ring!
     
  3. shoturtle

    shoturtle  

    823
    Oct 15, 2010
    Yeah, the panasonic LC55 is not a bad lens pretty similar to the canon 500D. The 500D does come in a 52mm thread. I have allot of ef lenses at 58mm for my eos that is why I use a step up ring instead of getting the 52mm version.
     
  4. Does the AF still function correctly with the 500D attached? I'm interested in both m4/3 contrast-detect and Canon DSLR phase-detect.
     
  5. shoturtle

    shoturtle  

    823
    Oct 15, 2010
    yes it does, all the samples I posted was with the AF on.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. FOsteology

    FOsteology Mu-43 Rookie

    16
    Feb 4, 2010
    Texas
    That is very interesting, and an affordable way to get one's feet wet with Macro.

    I'm curious how the Oly 14-150mm would perform. Any reason to stick with the Canon 500D instead of the 250D?
     
  7. shoturtle

    shoturtle  

    823
    Oct 15, 2010
    The 4 diopter of the 250d would give you very thin dof. So with a longer lens like the 14-150 you will need to really stop down to the F20's, While the 500D at 2 diopter you can get good dof at f13-f16. Making it a bit easier for handheld close up shots. The 250D on a short lens with a FL less then 70mm would work well. As the lens does not have as much mag as a long zoom. I have been playing with the idea of getting a 250D for super macro. But I would be restricted to only shooting on tripods with it.
     
  8. FOsteology

    FOsteology Mu-43 Rookie

    16
    Feb 4, 2010
    Texas
    Appreciate the information. I just may have to pick up a 500D and give it a whirl. :thumbup:
     
  9. shoturtle

    shoturtle  

    823
    Oct 15, 2010
    It is not very expensive, and gives you good results. A good way to start out with macro. And while I have a true macro lens the olympus 35mm 3.5 with the 4/3 adapter. The 45-200 and the 500D lets me travel a bit lighter when I do not want to carry more then 2 lenses. And gives me nice results.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.