Macro and Olympus E p1

Joel

New to Mu-43
Joined
Nov 22, 2010
Messages
5
What 70 to 130mm prime lens would work best with my E p1? I would like a low f stop.
 

shoturtle

 
Joined
Oct 15, 2010
Messages
823
is that with or without the crop factor? And are you looking for a macro lens mainly? AF or non AF?
 

Joel

New to Mu-43
Joined
Nov 22, 2010
Messages
5
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #3
Olympus lens

Macro mainly. AF would be nice
 

~tc~

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
2,494
Location
Houston, TX
How much do you want to spend?

Your best 2 options with AF are the panasonic leica 45/2.8 in micro 43 and oly 50/2 in reg 43

Both are exceptional. PL45 is 1:1, oly is 1:2
 

OzRay

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
4,991
Location
South Gippsland, Australia
Real Name
Ray, not Oz
I'd really consider a manual macro lens. While AF can be useful at times, for most macro work, one is really working with manual focus, to ensure that the right part of the subject is in focus, not what the camera selects.

Cheers

Ray
 

shoturtle

 
Joined
Oct 15, 2010
Messages
823
If you want not to spend to much, olympus 35mm 3.5 macro with the 4/3 adapter. The lens new is 180 dollars, and the adapter from panny is about 100 dollars. Nice an inexpensive and does a really nice job.
 

playak47

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
297
I have the olympus OM 50mm f3.5 macro lens. It is very nice manual lens. One can be had from ebay for $60 plus another $30 for the adapter. Total setup less than $100.
 

~tc~

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
2,494
Location
Houston, TX
I'd really consider a manual macro lens. While AF can be useful at times, for most macro work, one is really working with manual focus, to ensure that the right part of the subject is in focus, not what the camera selects.

Cheers

Ray
Agreed MF for macro, but these lenses are also the leading choice for portrait and other uses where AF would be nice
 

Joel

New to Mu-43
Joined
Nov 22, 2010
Messages
5
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #10
What about a slighty longer lens, like a 100 or 90 mm
 

~tc~

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
2,494
Location
Houston, TX
What about a slighty longer lens, like a 100 or 90 mm
Do you mean focal length or effective focal length?

200 or 180 effective would be awful long ... If you meant effective, that would be the 45-50 we are recommending
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom