Lumix 12-35mm 2.8 Question

Discussion in 'Panasonic Cameras' started by ddjchemist, Aug 9, 2013.

  1. ddjchemist

    ddjchemist New to Mu-43

    I am new to micro 4/3. I have been Nikon and Canon DSLR users for about a decade, but I decided to give it a try to Lumix micro 4/3. My initial impression is very positive (I got GX1, 25mm 1.4 and 14mm 2.5 lenses), so I am considering buying 12-35mm 2.8 Lumix lens. However, I have a question that someone might be able to answer me. Did anyone on this forum compare Lumix 12-35mm lens to Nikon or Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 lenses?

    Cheers,
    Dan
     
  2. RoadTraveler

    RoadTraveler Mu-43 All-Pro

    Nov 23, 2012
    Are you asking if someone did a direct (photo) comparison? I didn't do any comparison shooting so I can't help you there.

    However, as a 15 year Canon SLR shooter I used the Canon 24-70 L f/2.8 lens for most of my shooting. When I decided to try Panasonic m4/3 late last year I started with the 12-35 f/2.8 (instead of a kit lens), with every intention of switching platforms if I liked and could work well with m4/3.

    For my work the 12-35 is more useful (focuses closer) and I could not be happier. I don't use Canon any more.
     
  3. xdayv

    xdayv Color Blind

    Aug 26, 2011
    Tacloban City, Philippines
    Dave
    Same as what RoadTraveler said...

    Haven't done any comparison with my Nikkor 24-70 2.8, and have no intentions to do so. The 12-35 is sharp wide open across the zoom range. My 24-70 is in the drybox while my 12-35 is in my bag if that is any indication. :biggrin:

    IMHO, it is a good all purpose lens because of the convenience of the zoom range from 12 to 35, however since you have the 14 and 25, I don't see any reason to add the 12-35 unless you need - the convenience of the zoom, and/or a one lens solution. The 14 and 25 would suffice in most situations.
     
  4. cmpatti

    cmpatti Mu-43 Veteran

    263
    May 8, 2011
    Berkeley, CA
  5. jnewell

    jnewell Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jun 23, 2011
    Boston, MA
    Roger said:

     
  6. pdk42

    pdk42 One of the "Eh?" team

    Jan 11, 2013
    Leamington Spa, UK
    I had a Canon 24-105 which I used with a 5dii. The 12-35 on my OMD is just as good, if not a little better in IQ. The 12-35 is faster of course and has less range. Personally, I'm very happy with the 12-35 and would recommend it without hesitation
     
  7. Loonylumix

    Loonylumix Mu-43 Rookie

    24
    Aug 30, 2012
    England
    Not forgetting the Image Stabilization which the Canon does not have, unless you get the 24-70 f/4... and then why not get the 24-105?
    I have hand held at 1/2 second with the 12-35... its one of the best zooms on the market and all the lens you could ever need...
     
  8. mattia

    mattia Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    May 3, 2012
    The Netherlands
    +1 to that. And I rate my 24-105 very highly. I miss the range, though, and wouldn't mind oly releasing aiming longer. But it's gotta start at 12mm for me.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.