1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Lumix 12-35 vs primes

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by ahendarman, Jul 24, 2012.

  1. ahendarman

    ahendarman Mu-43 Regular

    Jun 9, 2012
    Agoura Hills, CA
    What would you rather have (with similar prices), for general use
    1. Lumix 12-35 f/2.8
    2. Lumix 14mm + PL25 + Oly 45 + a 14-4x kit lens
  2. Yohan Pamudji

    Yohan Pamudji Mu-43 Veteran

    Jun 21, 2012
    Mississippi, USA
    #2 for me. I'd rather have 1-2 stops more light gathering ability and more DOF control than the convenience of a zoom.
  3. m43dex

    m43dex Mu-43 Veteran

    Mar 5, 2011
    Just purchased 12-35 (waiting for delivery) so I think you know my answer... Although I have 45mm 1.8 and have not sold 14mm yet.
  4. RT_Panther

    RT_Panther Mu-43 Legend

    May 4, 2011
    For general use, I'd take the Zoom.....For type specific use, primes....
    • Like Like x 1
  5. CPWarner

    CPWarner Mu-43 Veteran

    Dec 24, 2010
    I have the 12-35mm. Great lens. I also have a handful of primes that I will keep. They all have their purposes.
  6. DHart

    DHart Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Jan 7, 2010
    Scottsdale, Arizona
    As RT prefers, for me... general use, travel.. the 12-35/2.8 is compact, no lens swaps to do, awesome optical quality, and the 12mm FOV is important to me; I much prefer the 12mm FOV vs. 14mm.

    Given specific photographic objectives, plenty of time and no problem with carrying a bunch of lenses and swapping them around, I pick the primes, but that 14mm has to be a 12mm for me.

    I have all of the mentioned lenses and must say, the 12-35/2.8 is a stellar performer. Also, as CPWarner mentions.. they're all great lenses. I feel that none of them is a perfect replacement for another... they each have specific attributes which make them desirable.
    • Like Like x 3
  7. jloden

    jloden Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    May 15, 2012
    Hunterdon County, NJ
    Agreed with Don on both these points; I'd rather the 12mm wide end than a 14mm prime. I also own all of the mentioned lenses, except the 14mm prime - so it was interesting trying to actually pick a choice for the poll, seeing as how I couldn't in real life :tongue:

    My take is lenses like the 45mm f/1.8 and 25mm f/1.4 are compelling over the 12-35 in their own right for *specific* uses (portraits and low light general use, respectively). For general overall use the 12-35mm makes an excellent choice as it's reasonably fast, *very* sharp, close-focusing, and covers the 12mm wide angle which I enjoy having as an option. So I voted for the 12-35mm, but the reality is I would still want a faster lens or two around for truly low light situations. I also still have the 45mm around for portraits and short telephoto, as the 35mm feels short to me. I find the 12-35 + a 20/25mm and 45mm a nice complementary kit that can be easily carried and covers a wide range of needs.

    On the flip side: if I were to sell off every lens I own (of those mentioned above) but one, it would probably be the 25mm f/1.4 It's a great general use prime that's sharp, renders beautifully, and offers a fast aperture for low light or shallow DoF uses.
  8. jeffryscott

    jeffryscott Mu-43 Top Veteran

    Jul 2, 2010
    12-35 because it is weather sealed. Killed my 14 last week by getting it a little wet.
  9. CPWarner

    CPWarner Mu-43 Veteran

    Dec 24, 2010
    Agree with the views here that 12mm is much preferred to 14mm on the wide end.
  10. bcaslis

    bcaslis Mu-43 Veteran

    Jul 3, 2011
    Wilsonville, OR, USA
    Brian Caslis
    None of the poll choices. I'd rather have the Olympus 12-50, 12mm, & 45mm.
  11. The only one that I would consider to truly replacable is the 14/2.5, although that lens still has merit based on it's size (and price!). When it comes to wide-angle my general preference is for a zoom to allow me to fine-tune the angle-of-view. Ideal world, it'd be the 12-35mm, 25mm, and the 45mm :smile:
  12. ssgreenley

    ssgreenley Mu-43 Top Veteran

    May 12, 2011
    I finally got my trinity of 12, 20, and 45. It will be at least a year (probably a couple of years if I'm successful in buying a stinkin' house) until I can get any more lenses. That being said, the duo of f/2 zooms will likely be those next purchases (unless a 12-60 should come out in the mean time!)...
  13. shizlefonizle

    shizlefonizle Mu-43 Veteran

    Apr 21, 2012
    Im really enjoying my 12, 25, 45 (PL) although Im willing to give up the 12mm for the 12-35mm if it ever comes down in price
  14. brutto

    brutto Mu-43 Veteran Subscribing Member

    Feb 17, 2011
    12-35/2.8 + 45/1.8 would suit me. I'd add the 75/1.8 if I could ever afford it.

    Not sure what I'll do when the 35-100/2.8 comes out. Very tempting to cover all I need with two zooms.
    • Like Like x 1
  15. dre_tech

    dre_tech Mu-43 Veteran

    Jan 31, 2012

    I also still have the 20/1.7 which is nice and compact, but I'd rather carry the 12-35 on the camera for the 12mm option.

    Oh, and the zoom also gives you a 17.5/2.8 if you zoom it there :wink:
    • Like Like x 1
  16. abat

    abat Mu-43 Rookie

    May 30, 2012
    Sydney, Australia
    12-35 f/2.8. For me the convenience of a zoom outweighs the additional light gathering ability of the primes. And constant f/2.8 is no slouch either compared to the kit lenses. That said 35mm is a tad short.
  17. leendertv

    leendertv Mu-43 Regular

    Nov 22, 2011
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Sigma 12-35mm f2.8 ;-)
  18. meyerweb

    meyerweb Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Sep 5, 2011
    Given the specific choice, I'd probably take the zoom. But that doesn't mean I don't want primes. Each have their uses. I'd keep my 20mm 1.7 even with the 12-35. There are times the additional light gathering or shallower DOF are important. But the zoom could do a lot of what I need with results that are more than good enough.

    I don't think I'd use the 45 prime enough to justify its cost. I am interested in the 35-100, though. If I can afford it.
  19. D@ne

    D@ne Mu-43 Top Veteran

    Feb 23, 2012
    ^ agreed. I have this zoom, and it's very practical. I still plan on keeping the PL25 for times when I want to shoot in low light, or something specific. Plus, the 25 is smaller...better for parties/restaurants.
  20. ahendarman

    ahendarman Mu-43 Regular

    Jun 9, 2012
    Agoura Hills, CA
    Looks like the zoom is very popular regardless of its price. In the ideal world, I would have 12-35 f/2.8 and the primes, but alas, I cannot afford them.
    I have a big trip coming up early next year. I would probably get a 12-35 for its versatility. Maybe Oly will come up with m43 12-60 f/2.8-4, that would be ideal.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.