1. Reminder: Please user our affiliate links to get to your favorite stores for holiday shopping!

Lower than f.95

Discussion in 'Open Discussion' started by LegacyLens, Jun 17, 2012.

  1. LegacyLens

    LegacyLens Mu-43 Regular

    99
    Apr 25, 2012
    If you go to f.01 assuming it is mathematically possible would you have ANY dof? Or just a very soft crappy image. (for the first question assume that it is very sharp.)

    auto will destroy us all
     
  2. jyc860923

    jyc860923 Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Feb 28, 2012
    Shenyang, China
    贾一川
    a little off the topic, I have read both sides comments and it kinda makes me doubt if the 25 0.95 really beats the 25 1.4 in sharpness under the same aperture.
     
  3. nickthetasmaniac

    nickthetasmaniac Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jan 11, 2011
    Curious why you thought this comment should be posted in this thread?
     
  4. CUB

    CUB Mu-43 Veteran

    275
    Apr 19, 2012

    The aperture limit for a lens is about f/0.7. You can use the usual DOF equations to see how much (or how little) depth of field that aperture gives.
     
  5. Promit

    Promit Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jun 6, 2011
    Baltimore, MD
    Promit Roy
    • Like Like x 1
  6. nickthetasmaniac

    nickthetasmaniac Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jan 11, 2011
    Why is that? I'm genuinely curious
     
  7. Justified_Sinner

    Justified_Sinner Mu-43 Regular

    193
    Feb 11, 2010
    Scotland, UK
    Dauvit Alexander
    Thanks for starting this thread. I was thinking about this all afternoon after reading the articles on Stanley Kubrick's "Barry Lyndon" in this thread earlier:

    https://www.mu-43.com/f35/stanley-kubrick-photographer-27934/

    That list on Wikipedia has me wanting to see some of these bizarre lenses, such as the f0.5:

    USSRPhoto.com - Russian / Soviet Cameras Wiki Catalog - World's fastest lens

    There are some photographs taken with the Rayxar 50mm f0.7 on an EP-1 here:

    Hand mit Rayxar 50mm f0,75 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

    As the original post suggested: mush!
     
  8. CUB

    CUB Mu-43 Veteran

    275
    Apr 19, 2012

    I wish I could remember. A university professor who specialised in optics told me some years ago but my memory is like a sieve. :rolleyes:

    But I have seen the f/0.7 quoted in magazine articles quite a few times since.
     
  9. Conrad

    Conrad Mu-43 Veteran

    The simple answer: yes.

    But there are some practical limits. Lenses become increasingly larger for smaller f-numbers, especially when they need to be used at different object distances. The reason is that the lens diameter is inversely proportional to the f-number. The second reason is that the lower the f-number, the more difficult it is to control the aberrations, and even more glass (extra elements, special glass) is needed for that.

    For photo/film purposes, faster than f/0.95 is an extreme rarity. For fixed distance applications (like some technical imaging), f/0.7 does occur. Two imaging areas, however, excel in low f-numbers: microscopy and IC lithography. For both, equipment is available with f-numbers as low as 0.18 to 0.20. But these are highly specialized lenses, with almost fixed magnification and working distance (measured in microns) and typical dof of a few hundred nanometers. That is a thousand times thinner than paper.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  10. LegacyLens

    LegacyLens Mu-43 Regular

    99
    Apr 25, 2012
    Now I am wondering if microscope lenses can be mounted on m43 thanks lol
     
  11. Promit

    Promit Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jun 6, 2011
    Baltimore, MD
    Promit Roy