I have the em-1 II and the LX100. I have no fast primes for the Oly because of the Panny. I use the Oly for wide and long and have one "travel" lens for it, the 12-100. The Oly with the 12-100 or the 14-150, and the 8-18 plus the Panny is all I need for travel.Is this a stupid thing to do?
I've spent the past few years with the EM5 and have bought and sold lenses; now I'm currently packing around the 12-40 Pro, 40-150 Pro, and 8mm Pro Fisheye.
I love the camera (minus the ergonomics), love the lenses, but do not fancy carrying around all this crap. I feel that I'm missing out a ton on good photo opportunities because I haven't necessarily found a lens that's good for everything and I hate carrying around the bag. I'm usually already carrying a large pack (climbing pack) and don't care to carry any extra.
I'm pretty sold on selling my setup and switching to the Panny LX100 or the Leica D Lux 109 BUT I want some people to play the devils advocate. I've spent a fair bit of change on buying the lenses new when they came out, and my return will probably be pennies on the dollar.
I just want a camera that takes damn good pics that doesn't take up all the space of my current setup.
ALL SUGGESTIONS and CRITICISMS are very welcome. Thanks
Also, any ideas what my current package is worth on the used market?