Lens advice ... 12-40 f2.8 alternative

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by delkhouri, Feb 4, 2017.

  1. delkhouri

    delkhouri Mu-43 Regular

    38
    Jan 1, 2016
    So I have a Olympus EM10II and I am in the market to upgrade from my kit lens. As I have done a lot of research, I had pretty much settled on the 12-40 2.8. Well today I went to my local shop and they had a used one for sale at a decent price ($600) but when I put it on my camera it was just too heavy and unbalanced. I don't have a grip on my camera and I was hoping to avoid that route. So what is an alternative.

    Is the panasonic 12-35 that much smaller/lighter that I would notice a big difference? I was hoping to try one of those out too but they didn't have any in stock.

    I know the Olympus 14-150II isn't smaller but it is quite a bit lighter. Also it isn't quite as sharp/fast but it is more versatile. Would I notice much of an iq boost with this lens over the kit 14-42rII?

    Currently I have the pana 14 2.5, the sigma 30 2.8 the olympus 14-42rII and the olympus 40-150 4.0-5.6. My plan was to Sell all of those but the 40-150, get a 12-40 and get a small fast prime for indoor/low light (17mm maybe) But now after feeling the weight and how lopsided my camera was with the 12-40, I just dont know.
     
  2. greenboy

    greenboy Mu-43 Top Veteran

    first good shot and you'd be used to it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
  3. Giiba

    Giiba Something to someone somewhere Subscribing Member

    Aug 19, 2016
    New Westminster, BC
    The panasonic 12-35 is something like 60gr lighter. Can't see that making a difference.
     
  4. delkhouri

    delkhouri Mu-43 Regular

    38
    Jan 1, 2016
    Olympus 12-40 382g - Panasonic 12-35 305g
     
  5. Giiba

    Giiba Something to someone somewhere Subscribing Member

    Aug 19, 2016
    New Westminster, BC
    Hmmm, that is 20% lighter. The 12-40 really was meant for the e-m1 where it balances wonderfully.
     
  6. PacNWMike

    PacNWMike Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Dec 5, 2014
    Salish Sea
    Yep, for all of those reasons it works for me.
     
  7. Replytoken

    Replytoken Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    May 7, 2012
    Puget Sound
    Ken
    Lighter zoom options, but not as fast as the 12-40, that might improve your image quality are the Panasonic 14-45 the latest Panasonic 14-42 and the Panasonic 12-32 (which does not offer MF).

    --Ken
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. Tywais

    Tywais Mu-43 Veteran

    223
    Jan 23, 2014
    Chiang Mai, Thailand
    Mike
  9. Holoholo55

    Holoholo55 Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Aug 13, 2014
    Honolulu, HI
    Walter
    There are accessory grips available for the EM10 II like the Olympus ECG-3 and similar 3rd party ones. The 12-40 Pro is a superb lens and an accessory grip would help using it on your EM10 II. The accessory grip would help with using any large lens.
     
  10. Steven

    Steven Mu-43 All-Pro

    May 25, 2012
    USA
    I got the 12-35 for the same reason. It feels smaller. If you want to wait and maybe check out the new 12-60/2.8-4? Its bigger though.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. sunnygps

    sunnygps Mu-43 Regular

    53
    Dec 26, 2013
    DFW, TX
    I sold my O12-40 for the P12-35 when I got the Panasonic GX85.

    The O12-40 pro on my E-M5 II felt heavy to walk around with. It is just about perfect on the E-M1.
     
  12. AllanG

    AllanG Mu-43 Top Veteran

    538
    Aug 26, 2014
    Brisbane, Australia
    Allan
    Go and try a Panasonic 14-140mm lens II. You will be surprised.
     
  13. pdk42

    pdk42 One of the "Eh?" team

    Jan 11, 2013
    Leamington Spa, UK
    I've got the 12-35 and had it before the 12-40 was launched. I've tried the 12-40 several times but it feels notably bigger and heavier on the E-M1 than the 12-35. Given your reaction to the 12-40, I suspect that you'll find the 12-35 fits your needs better. Optically it's a wash between them, although the 12-40 does focus a little closer. The 12-35 has OIS too - useful if one day you buy a Panasonic body - either the older ones with no IBIS, or the newer ones which use body IBIS and OIS together to deliver amazing stability.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  14. I've got a 12-40 and have tried the 12-35 in the shop. The 12-35 definitely feels better balanced on a smaller body - it doesn't extend as far as the 12-40 and its center of mass is further back.

    If I was still shooting an E-M5 or RF style body with no grip I'd prefer the handling of the 12-35, but seeing as I have an E-M1 I get good use out of the close focusing capability and for decent portrait use at 40mm.

    One thing that bothers me about the 12-35 is the silicone zoom ring - it attracts dust like crazy and might eventually get a bit slack - I've seen that happen with the ring on the PL25.
     
    Last edited: Feb 6, 2017
    • Informative Informative x 1
  15. nstelemark

    nstelemark Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    May 28, 2013
    Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
    Larry
    I would say yes. I haven't seen any issues with the zoom ring personally. The 12-35 is better balanced on the smaller bodies.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Julia

    Julia Mu-43 Veteran

    375
    Mar 9, 2013
    Dresden, Germany
    My local store didn't have both the Pana and Oly (they only had the Oly) so I had to try the Pana at a different location (therefore no side by side comparision). Still: the Panasonic might not look like a big difference on paper, but it is noticeable smaller and lighter when you handle it. I personally did not like the feel of the lens, though: it felt less sturdy, the zoom and focus rings turned a little too easily for my taste (too easy to accidentally turn them) whereas the Oly rings feel much better, and I couldn't find a way to comfortably hold the lens (as I always hold my camera and lens, using both hands, when the lens is bigger than a pancake).

    So, even though I always like to go for smaller and lighter, I bought the Oly 12-40.

    I don't own any of the other lenses you mentioned, so I can't offer any advise in regard to that, sorry!
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  17. Chris5107

    Chris5107 Mu-43 All-Pro Subscribing Member

    Jan 28, 2011
    USA
    Chris
    The 12-35mm is smaller and lighter of course. Look at the percentage differences. It is significant.

    I have used the 12-35mm on the E-P5 and now the EM5-2.

    It still may be too large on the camera for you but it is definitely a noticeable improvement (especially weight wise) compared to the Oly 12-40.

    Oly vs Pan
    382 vs 305 g. 25% heavier is significant

    The oly is 3% wider and 13% longer (not a huge deal here)
     
  18. nstelemark

    nstelemark Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    May 28, 2013
    Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
    Larry
    The weight is not the major issue. The 12-40 has heavier front elements. It is more balance than weight. It feels almost the same mounted as the 12-60SWD which really surprised me.
     
  19. Speedliner

    Speedliner Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Mar 2, 2015
    Southern NJ, USA
    Rob
    I don't understand the balance issue. If you support the lens with your left hand it should always be in "balance" shouldn't it?
     
    • Agree Agree x 12
    • Like Like x 2
  20. Phocal

    Phocal Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Jan 3, 2014
    Houston
    I never really understood that either.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.