Leica M vs Leica R

I am using both Leica M and R systems, except the lenses are more bulky I don't think these R lenses are in what way inferior to its M counterparts. In fact, I use R system most often than M system.

I use either a M to M4/3 adapter with a Noveflex R to M adapter or a Olympus 4/3 to M4/3 adapter with Leica R to M adapter in adapting R lenses to my Lumix G-1 camera...

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/amoebahydra/5029847194/" title="Flickr 上 amoebahydra 的 Pan G-1 Leica R 80-14 b">

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

"1024" height="713" alt="Pan G-1 Leica R 80-14 b" /></a>

 

The telephoto lenses are optically the same, M-Mount lenses tend to run more as the mount is more complex and the M8 and M9 keep prices up. The R-Mount wide-angle lenses are retrofocus design, tend to be physically bigger than the M-Mount counterpart. The 50mm lenses are comparable.

 

The humble Summicron 50/2 R is one of my favorite MF lenses on the GH1, very easy to focus and excellent results from wide open. And it's not overly huge either, just a great combo.

Stefan

 

Back in the day, the R lenses got a bad rap. It was said that they weren't up to par to the M lenses. After the heat settled down it was found that the issue wasn't the lenses, it was the R bodies. I had 2 R4Sp's and the mirror slap caused the issue.
Of course now with m43 it's not an issue at all...
The Leica's were the only SLR's I truly loved.
The lenses are excellent.
Enjoy, ya can't go wrong!