1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Konica Hexanon 52mm f1.8 - good lens?

Discussion in 'Adapted Lenses' started by simonz, Aug 29, 2010.

  1. simonz

    simonz Mu-43 Regular

    89
    Jul 20, 2010
    New England
    I just acquired a Hexanon AR 52mm f1.8 at a reasonable price. Is this a good lens or is the 50mm f1.7 a better lens? I use the Hexanon AR 40mm f1.8 on my E-P1 and getting great results.
     
  2. iliakoltsov

    iliakoltsov Mu-43 Regular

    195
    Aug 7, 2010
    Paris
    From what i could understand the 52 1.8 is a good lens, nothing wrong about it. As opposed to the 40 1.8 and the 50 1.7 that are just legendary , a lot of photographers consider them as the sharpest 40 and 50 mm lens ever made. I personally think a bit different :) . They are great lenses, in my opinion the sharpest lense that you can get is the helios 44 , and if you want a minolta lense it is definitely the Rokkor 50 1.4. So to conclude the 52 1.7 is good not great.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. dixeyk

    dixeyk Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Aug 9, 2010
    hmmm

    I've had the 50/1.7 and 52/1.8 to compare side by side and just got a 40/1.8. The 52/1.8 is not as highly sought after as the other two, but in practice the 52 is sharp, contrasty and is a real bargain. I suspect that the differences in these lenses might have more to do with individual copies differences than design. Of my copies the 40/1.8 is sharpest. That said, the 52 is a very nice lens.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.