Just for fun I went out this evening and shot a couple of comparison shots with my Konica 50/1.4 and Olympus 45/1.8. I shot them at f2.8 and manually focused the Konica (stating the obvious there) using the LCD and used the AF on the Olympus. All these images were shot within a few minutes of one another. This was by no means scientific. None the less I did find it interesting. I was actually surprised at the results. They're both great but I found that I prefer the Konica. The Olympus missed focus a bit. I can probably improve that focusing manually. I would have thought the AF would have been better than my 51 year old eyes on the LCD...outside. Go figure. These are at f5.6. The Konica is still a bit sharper but more than that it has a lovely rendering of the image. Not sure what's up with the WB being off. I think the Konica is a keeper.