Bah, just noticed the handle doesn't fit the outline of the reflected image. The Models 41 and 42, do and still match the required feature set.Could this be it? A 1904 Century Petite Century No. 3, The 1903 model didn't have a rotating or reversible back. Couldn't be any later than April 1904 because that's when one of her brothers who modeled for her died of Tetanus after being hurt playing on train tracks, but possibly as early as 1901, when the same photo showed a portrait on the mantle with a known taking date. Depends on whether you think this gentleman could have been 16 in this portrait.
View attachment 850262
Thanks another site bookmarkedThanks, as a thrift shop camera junkie I'm very familiar with the butkus resource, and went here today to see if I could find a match. no luck. After a couple more hours online I found this resource that explains my confusion, from http://www.piercevaubel.com/cam/catalogs/1901premopocolp514.htm
The Rochester Optical & Camera Co. was formed when the Rochester Optical Co. and Rochester Camera Co. merged along with other companies in 1899. Prior to the merger, the Rochester Optical Co. had developed an extensive line of leather-covered hand and stand-type cameras called Premo cameras. Likewise, rival Rochester Camera Co. (and their predecessor Rochester Camera Mfg. Co.) had developed and equally extensive line of similar cameras called Poco cameras. Apparently, the merger was financial or administrative only, as both the Premo and Poco lines continued to be made, despite the similarity of models. Separate Premo and Poco catalogs were issued in 1900, 1902 and 1903. The only catalog to show both lines is this one issued in 1901.
From the same link above I found this model, which more closely but not exactly matches the outline seen in the mirror reflection and matches all the features except for the plate size.
View attachment 850249
Here's a simple one: you can see both the ceiling lamp and it's reflection in the mirror. Ceiling lamp has a sharp tip hanging under some kind of a decorative ball in the center. If you draw a line through both the tip in the reflection and the tip of the lamp itself, it will go throught the center of the lens which you see in the mirrorSecond, judging by the camera's position in the frame as a mirror reflection, can it be the taking camera? In other words, can this be the camera that took the photo? The above are crops from the following two plates:
Thanks, WhidbyLVR's analysis was pretty convincing to me about her camera being the one in the reflection, he also agrees that the camera shifted to preserve room geometry.The fact that the vanishing point is off center on both the x and y axes suggests that your great grandmother used a camera that could do both shift and rise (and fall?). Not too many of the small folding cameras did shift. The possibility still exists that the image of the camera is hidden or obscured in the flowers.