Is there any reason to stick with the EM1 when the GH4 seems to blow it out of the water?

43degrees

New to Mu-43
Joined
May 11, 2014
Messages
1
Hi guys,

I currently have an EM5 with a PanaLeica 25 1.4 and 45/75 1.8 M.Zuikos. I've been putting some money aside the past four months to eventually buy the EM1 and 12-40 bundle for my Eurotrip next year :)

However, after seeing all the rave reviews on the GH4, I guess I am a bit hesitant in parting with my cash for an EM1. I've been more and more attracted with the hybrid system of the GH4 over the stills capabilities of the EM1. The way I see it, I'd be fine if the GH4 gets me within 95% of the EM1 IQ, although it seems to have no problem doing this, since I get some great video options.

Either way I will be getting each camera with their accompanying 24-70 equivalent 2.8s. I think I will miss the IBIS of the OMD system the most when dealing just with the OIS. Also I won't be able to use my 75 1.8 without a tripod anymore :(

Any input appreciated since I can't be the only one in the same boat. It isn't as cut and dry as switching from Nikon to Canon or FF to APSC I feel.
 

wildwildwes

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
456
Location
Brooklyn, NY
The GH4 is the current hot-shot darling of the M 4/3 format and is deservedly receiving a lot of ink. It is NOT however a game changer nor does it blow [the E-M1] out of the water. I own both cameras and while I'm still getting acquainted with the GH4 (and still am not able to process its RAW file output), what I've learned about both the E-M1 & GH4 is that each offers distinctive features unique to each but not necessarily shared by both.

The EM-1 is a stunning LITTLE pro-quality stills camera with better than average video capabilities (trust me, my editor actually LOVES the E-M1s video output and prefers it to my D800s) and its IBIS truly puts it in a league of its own. To me, it is among the most important photographic advances EVER and gives the E-M1 a SUBSTANTIAL advantage over the GH4 in this area alone. There is more I can rant and rave about here but suffice as to say, the E-M1 can easily stand its own...

Turning to the GH4 -- yes, it is undoubtedly the "best" video / hybrid (as in "DSLR" style still / motion) currently available. It's ability to capture and output 4k video without the use of an external recorder and at its price point is truly unparalleled. The improvements claimed to have been made to the sensor have yet to manifest themselves in any empirical manner that distinguishes itself from the E-M1, although the still files I've seen are excellent. Furthermore, although a lot has been written about the GH4's professional build quality, it still feels kind of cheap and [yes] plasticky, not to mention somewhat bulbous and large given its diminutive format.

All of that said, I bought each for the merits in which they excel at -- the GH4 for video / motion and the E-M1 for its still IQ. That's my current take on on this "debate". They're both outstanding photographic tools that will yield results commensurate with the skills of the photographer operating it.

Good luck with your search. Hope you're able to fill us in as to which direction you took once you've made your decision...

Cheers!

W
 

GFFPhoto

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Feb 24, 2013
Messages
1,793
This thread title will not push anybody's buttons...

If you have 43 glass its a no brainer
If you want high end video its a no brainer
If neither apply its a brainer

E-M1 for its still IQ.
People are reporting the GH4 sensor has a 1/2 stop more latitude. Just sayin...
 

tosvus

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Jan 4, 2014
Messages
677
Ibis on all your lenses + legacy adapted lenses is a consideration. Since I shoot both stills and video (probably 70/30, plus I have some stabilized lenses), my choice would be GH4, but if my budget at some point affords it, I would love to have a Em1 as well.
 

val

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
548
Location
Australia
Real Name
William
Honestly it comes down to whether you want IBIS or the extra video features.

stills IQ should be the same, as stated above there might be a bit more latitude in the GH4.

I spent most of my photographic life without IBIS so I'm fine with lens stabilization and/or the GX7 IBIS although I don but I've met some photographers who swear by it. either way both are very good cameras and have different fields that they specialize in.

GH4 doesn't blow the E-M1 out of the water, it's just a different flavour
 

OzRay

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
4,991
Location
South Gippsland, Australia
Real Name
Ray, not Oz
As I alluded to in another post, people seem to want better and better all the time. I really don't think there are many cameras out nowadays that fall short of the skill level of the user, rather than the other way around.
 

RnR

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
1,238
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Real Name
Hasse
Also I won't be able to use my 75 1.8 without a tripod anymore :(
Do you think it will be hard to keep the shutter speed above 1/150 on a GH4?

Any input appreciated since I can't be the only one in the same boat. It isn't as cut and dry as switching from Nikon to Canon or FF to APSC I feel.
I fail to see the confusion. Your M5 is still an awesome piece of kit. Do you really feel that you are being limited creatively using an M5?
 

GFFPhoto

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Feb 24, 2013
Messages
1,793
I'd be fine if the GH4 gets me within 95% of the EM1 IQ
I see stuff like this sometimes. It seems like there is a common misconception about IQ. Maybe because of the video on the GH series, people seem to forget about its stills capability.

When the EM5 and GH3 were top of the heap, they had identical IQ. They had the same Sony sensor. One had 5 axis IBIS, one had high end video, but the IQ was exactly the same. Now the EM1 and GH4 both have a Panasonic sensors (although likely different ones). While early reports say the GH4 sensor has a bit more latitude, for real world application they will have the same IQ. One has 5 axis IBIS, one has DFD focusing and 4k video, but neither camera has a benefit in IQ for stills.
 

kevinparis

Cantankerous Scotsman
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
3,912
Location
Gent, Belgium
A lot depends on what you are expecting to do video wise. If you are just looking to make family type videos or a video diary of your trip then the E-M1 will probably more than satisfy you , in fact the IBIS will help you.

If you are taking a more 'professional' approach to film making, or have some existing knowledge of the craft then maybe the GH4 might work out better for you, assuming you can budget for all the rigs, tripods, faster computer, editing software, better microphones, ND filters etc that are part and parcel of the process you will need to follow in order to get full advantage of the GH4.

Film making is much much more than the camera... just look at the list of credits at the end of a movie and you will realise how complex the process can be.

I wouldn't recommend a GH4 as a first step into video shooting

Just my opinion and as worth as much as what you paid for it :)

K
 

T N Args

Agent Photocateur
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
3,469
Location
Adelaide, Australia
Real Name
call me Arg
Your M5 is still an awesome piece of kit. Do you really feel that you are being limited creatively using an M5?
+1. Perhaps you can think about the ways in which the M5 is not meeting your needs, and get the camera that best covers those areas?

The EM-1 is a stunning LITTLE pro-quality stills camera ...

Turning to the GH4 -- although a lot has been written about the GH4's professional build quality, it still feels kind of cheap and [yes] plasticky, not to mention somewhat bulbous and large
Regarding size and weight, the link below shows that the Panasonic with 12-35 lens is marginally (insignificantly) shorter and lighter than the Olympus with 12-40 lens.

http://j.mp/1gcDHm6 (yes it shows GH3 but GH4 is the same near enough)
 

tosvus

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Jan 4, 2014
Messages
677
I doubt the GH4 is any harder than the EM-1 for simple video. If you plan handheld, I'd have to recommend a stabilized lens of course, if using the GH4. Other than that, after a one time setup (perhaps set up two different profiles), you can easily shoot video in "full auto" if that is what you desire. It will likely track better than the EM-1 can, it has the framerates from 24-96fps in 1080p (you can stick to one or two if you like), and 4K is just there as an option. This is also designed to NOT OVERHEAT - an important consideration for video!! The files for 1080p should not be harder to work with than EM-1 files, though the higher bitrates allowed, means you COULD use a lot more space, but it is not necessarily so, depending on your settings. Then if you want to go more advanced, it has support for a whole slew of other things, like video output to external recorder in 10 bit, great audio input/monitoring possibilities etc, better color profiles for grading, and of course, 4K + high speed capture (96fps@1080p). It really cannot be beat in the video department, and I think again, provided you have a good stabilized lens, even for simple video, it will work better than the EM-1.

..too bad they didn't manage to squeeze in ibis too :)
 

pdk42

One of the "Eh?" team
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
6,558
Location
Leamington Spa, UK
I totally agree with Kevin here. I'm no videographer, but know someone who is (ex BBC Trained) and the camera is but one small piece of gear that together fills the trunk of his car. If video is that important to you, then the GH4 makes a lot of sense, but for stills, I'd be surprised if there much in it - and IBIS is a really important feature.
 

lightmonkey

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
479
I throw away maybe 1/200 shots due to shake/blur. That's a huge improvement in keepability of photos.

Since I don't shoot videos, GH4 holds no interest for me
 

ippikiokami

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Mar 19, 2014
Messages
29
Location
Atlanta, GA
I guess the EM1 holds no interest for you either: it shoots video too. :rolleyes: Get a Nikon Df?

It makes little sense to me to refuse to consider a modern camera that has a feature you won't use. They all do.
GH4 if you REALLY are thinking about doing video. Not like a lot of photographers (like me) that always think they will get into and buy equipment for it only to not.
IQ effectively the same like most people here said. I do like the IBIS on the EM1 a lot though.
 

lightmonkey

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
479
I guess the EM1 holds no interest for you either: it shoots video too. :rolleyes: Get a Nikon Df?

It makes little sense to me to refuse to consider a modern camera that has a feature you won't use. They all do.
Exception it doesn't have a feature I consider essential: the IBIS of EM1 that is a game changer for stills.

That's an explanation of my personal working/shooting style, and rationale for decision making. You're free to build your own.
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom