1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Is the X 14-42 sharp enough?

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by Bill, Nov 18, 2011.

  1. Bill

    Bill Mu-43 Regular

    Apr 15, 2009
    Brisbane, Australia
    Bill (really)
    There will be plenty of detailed reviews later, but I wanted to see if the pancake X 14-42mm does a good job beyond 14mm. So, I did a a quick and dirty comparison of the X14-42mm and the 14-140mm. The Lightroom crops on my blog are at 2 to 1. Serious pixel-peeping. The crops are from the near-centres of the frames.

    Both are at about 35mm, hand-held, f5.6, 1/1250, ISO160, and with stabilisation.

    Bill Danby
    • Like Like x 1
  2. dhazeghi

    dhazeghi Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Aug 6, 2010
    San Jose, CA
    If you don't have the double-image problem at the long end that has been reported, it looks like a decent lens. Not too surprising that it would equal the 14-140 in the center. Given the convenient package, I hope they resolve the other problem quickly...

  3. ~tc~

    ~tc~ Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Oct 22, 2010
    Houston, TX
    I think the double image problem is the 45-175X, not the little pancake
  4. dhazeghi

    dhazeghi Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Aug 6, 2010
    San Jose, CA
  5. haigaw

    haigaw Mu-43 Rookie

    Sep 25, 2011
    interesting, my 14-42X was actually sharper after firmware update. compared to my kit 14-42 at wide and tele end both were pretty much the same (RAW, untouched). Before the firmware update the X lens was pretty blurry no matter what i did
  6. Djarum

    Djarum Super Moderator Subscribing Member

    Dec 15, 2009
    Huntsville, AL, USA
    I have yet to see a review or samples that give me good confidence to buy the pancake. While Panasonic markets this lens as being better optically than their regular kit lens, I haven't seen any samples proving that.

    Looking at Bill's sample, it appears that the 14-140 might be sharper at that focal length. But then again, typically superzooms usually are sharper in the middle ranges.
  7. meyerweb

    meyerweb Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Sep 5, 2011
    A test at 35mm doesn't really demonstrate much. The people reporting problems with the 14-42X see it mostly at 42mm.
  8. Ned

    Ned Mu-43 Legend

    Jul 18, 2010
    Alberta, Canada
    Irregardless of this being only one focal length, I see a lot more contrast in the 14-140mm... xP Just sayin'.
  9. Bill

    Bill Mu-43 Regular

    Apr 15, 2009
    Brisbane, Australia
    Bill (really)
    That's right about the middle range being sharper. I picked that length becasue I knew the 14-140 to be very sharp at that point and I wanted something with high quaity for the comparison. Clearly, the 14-140 has a bit more resolution and contrast; but the X 14-42 comes off okay.

    I had seen a lot of samples at 14mm and I wanted to move into the longer end. I'm really looking forward to a dpreview test.

    By the way, the comparison was post-firmware upgrade.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.