1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Is M43 really so bad at high ISO? Comparison to A7Sii and X-T1

Discussion in 'Back Room' started by WGPhotography, Nov 22, 2016.

  1. 50orsohours

    50orsohours Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Oct 13, 2013
    Portland Oregon
    You know, we have a really nice large HD tv. Beautiful picture. But when I am putting a DVD in the dvd player and the programming starts and if I am right up on the tv, the pixelation is terrible!!! So I personally don't put much faith in pixel peeping. Doesn't improve my artistry (or lack of it) one bit. And the pictures on the wall look just fine. :) 
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. If you are fine with compressed 720x480 in 2016 then you are pretty much fine with any camera from the Nintendo DSi up :D 

    There has gotta be a pretty high correlation between the "m43 doesn't have noise problems" and the "who even wants a 4k tv" people from last year, back before Olympus had a camera that did it :D 
     
  3. Ramsey

    Ramsey Mu-43 Top Veteran

    745
    Jan 9, 2013
    Zagreb, Croatia
    I know, lack of noise is not what makes or breaks a photograph. I never once said it does. Light, subject, composition, story, etc etc. From what i've seen from your work, you have much better eye and technique than i do in all of those areas. A great photo taken with an iPhone will trump mediocre photo taken by a mediocre photographer with a 5d mark 4 or latest hasselblad.

    But the truth is, to some people it (ISO and noise) matters. Moreso than size of the camera or the cost or the handling. It is no surprise that, due to sensor size, m43 handles noise "worse" than APSC which handles it "worse" than FF. You or anyone else may think it's petty, but in the end it's their call. We cannot change those people, nor should we. If someone is not happy, so be it. Plenty of great cameras and systems, both with mirrors and without them.

    From what i've seen, these threads usually end up badly. People get upset about claims on equivalence, size, handling, DOF, ISO, AF speed and pretty much everything else. I see no reason to get defensive about the bad sides of m43, but that's just me. I can accept it's bad sides and still want more in the future generations of m43 cameras. I will still use the system, because it suits me more than e.g. Sony FF line up.

    I think we can all agree that every system has it's good and bad sides. Most of us can also agree that pretty much every modern camera is good enough for most purposes.

    Cheers.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. 50orsohours

    50orsohours Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Oct 13, 2013
    Portland Oregon
    I agree with your post 100% - that is why I feel, that if you need something that the D500 shines at, get the D500. Complaining about your FF gear not fitting into a small shoulder bag, is not going to change physics. Get a bigger bag, or get a smaller system.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. 50orsohours

    50orsohours Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Oct 13, 2013
    Portland Oregon
    Who are you talking to?
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.