Interesting Video..LR vs OV

Discussion in 'Image Processing' started by Dave in Wales, Jan 28, 2015.

  1. Dave in Wales

    Dave in Wales Mu-43 All-Pro

    Nov 5, 2011
    West Wales
    • Like Like x 1
  2. budeny

    budeny Mu-43 All-Pro

    Mar 4, 2014
    Boulder, CO
    What's the point to compare default settings if no one really using them?
    It's the end result that counts and how much time it takes to get to it.
    • Like Like x 1
  3. wjiang

    wjiang Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    LR4 surely did not have the new Olympus emulation profiles Adobe introduced more recently - they are a lot closer for a starting point that Adobe default.
  4. alan1972

    alan1972 Mu-43 Top Veteran Subscribing Member

    Jun 23, 2012
    Malaga, Spain
    Alan Grant
    There was a fairly long thread on this a couple of years ago:

    That discussion would have taken place before Lightroom introduced the Olympus profiles that Wijang mentioned. I have no idea if taking one of those profiles as a starting point would change the conclusions of the original video or not.
  5. GBarrington

    GBarrington Mu-43 Top Veteran

  6. budeny

    budeny Mu-43 All-Pro

    Mar 4, 2014
    Boulder, CO
    I remember DPR made detailed comparison of LR, CaptureOne, DXO Optics, Aperture.
    The end result: IQ is more or less the same if you know what you're doing.