Image Aspect Ratios and Cropping

BillN

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
1,264
Location
SW France
Morning Folks

Image Aspect Ratios and Cropping

Another basic question that I would appreciate some guidance upon

We now have the “new” 4:3 format and traditionally there are the others that are, (have been), used in photography – i.e. 3:2, 16:9, 5:4, 6:7, 1:1.

When an image is cropped it can be cropped to any size, (ratio)

My question seeks guidance on “rules” regarding “cropping” – are there any - formal or otherwise? - i.e. is it “better” (should I), to stick to an established “ratio” or is anything permissible.

Looking at images in the “Galleries” – most stick to the 1024 x 768 size, but other do not
 

Brian Mosley

Administrator Emeritus
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
2,998
Hi Bill, I shoot raw (which is natively 4/3rds) and only crop if I intended to at capture, or if it occurs to me afterwards that the capture will work better in (usually) 16:9 or square, or I want to trim off a distracting object.

4/3rds actually serves most of my needs naturally.

I'd be interested in reading others' experience on this... thanks for the thread!

Cheers

Brian
 

Streetshooter

Administrator Emeritus
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
5,138
Location
Phila, Pa USA
Bill,
I never crop. I prefer to crop in the camera before exposure. That comes from a long line of streetshooters.....it ain't the law, it's just my way.....

There should be no Strict Standard on ratio. Ideally, after exposure, you would make an image....and then crop it until it is right to you. The exact ratio should have no bearing on it. Only the subject matter and the relationship within, should matter....

This sure makes working without cropping an easier task.......
Why don't I crop......hmmmm, glad ya asked......

It it from many years doing my own darkroom work. I loved a black border on my images. My Leica enlargers had negative carriers that were cut to provide a nice black border. I could never figure out how to put a border on if I cropped the image.....
So, I never cropped......

Well, that's the tech reason,...
the aesthetic reason is that I am a purest at heart and try to follow a tradition, (street work), established long before I even knew it existed.......
 

texascbx

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
389
Location
Texas
I crop to make the composition better and generally follow the rule of thirds, ignoring aspect ratio.
 

Brian Mosley

Administrator Emeritus
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
2,998
I try to compose at the time of capture - and when I think the composition requires a different aspect ratio (to 4/3rds), I make a mental note and do that in PP.

There's always a chance I can improve composition after the capture with a crop - but I try to do it in the camera.

Cheers

Brian
 

BillN

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
1,264
Location
SW France
Michael Reichmann of Luminous Landscape wrote an essay on the art of cropping which I found very interesting. It can be found here:http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/und-crop.shtml.

I crop when I think it will make the image better and I don't necessarily stick to a specific aspect ratio.

Kathy
this article says the most for me - it would be great to be able to do it all "in camera" everytime

but I will never be anywhere near that skillfull
 

Brian Mosley

Administrator Emeritus
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
2,998
Sorry, Bill I don't believe that at all.... give it time......
shooter
Correct, anything you want to be really good at... you have to be prepared to be crap at while you're practicing :horse:

Practice makes perfect! :flypig:

Cheers

Brian

p.s. love that we're allowed to say crap here :rofl:
 

Brian Mosley

Administrator Emeritus
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
2,998
Of course Bill, there are no hard and fast rules to photography... they're like walking along a path in the woods... sometimes the most spectacular finds are 20ft to the left of the path! Lol

It's useful to find your way home knowing where the path is though. :biggrin:

Cheers

Brian
 

Elliot

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Jan 22, 2010
Messages
38
Location
NORTHERN VIRGINIA USA
A matter of personal choice and experimentation

The EP-1 AND 2 offer easy ways of changing the format. I shoot mainly in the native 4/3, but took all of my cameras in the m43 bag and went out for day and shot in the 6.6 square format, with the understanding that their was going to be some pixel loss.

Working within the constraints of just that format, which I worked in many years ago, I was able to fully visualize the square and a blast composing for it. It forced me to look a little harder, perhaps step back a bit further or move in a bit tighter but all in all produced some very nice results.

Because we now have the ability to truly visualize what the format effect would be I think it is worth getting it right in the camera as much as possible before heading for the post processing desk.
 

Robert Spoecker

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
72
What am I missing here? If I crop to anything but the 4/3 ratio aren't I throwing away pixels (getting a smaller image)?

Why would I ever want to do that? if I keep in mind while shooting what aspect ratio I want to end up with I can shoot 4/3 and later crop it in almost any photo editing program and if I want to change my mind I can crop to any other ratio I wish.

Reminds me a little of the old advertising ploy of 8x optical zoom and (oh joy) up to 12x digital zoom. The digital zoom is accomplished by throwing away pixels which also can be accomplished by cropping the edges out and displaying the center larger.

Ummm, no thanks,

Robert
 

Brian Mosley

Administrator Emeritus
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
2,998
Best of both worlds... set the aspect ratio (e.g. 6:6 square format) for composing with live view - and shoot raw which captures the whole sensor area - unfortunately, only Olympus Master/Studio will read the aspect ratio from the raw file to apply as default.

But it's a good way to keep all the image data and shoot whatever aspect ratio you want to compose with.

Cheers

Brian
 

Streetshooter

Administrator Emeritus
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
5,138
Location
Phila, Pa USA
Your not missing anything. Also, the cropped aspect ratio in camera will not show up in a raw file.
The 4/3 ratio is a very complex visually.
There's little tension created by the framing so you have to create the tension carefully with subject matter.
Shooter
 

Djarum

Super Moderator
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
3,352
Location
Huntsville, AL, USA
Real Name
Jason
Bill,
I never crop. I prefer to crop in the camera before exposure. That comes from a long line of streetshooters.....it ain't the law, it's just my way.....

There should be no Strict Standard on ratio. Ideally, after exposure, you would make an image....and then crop it until it is right to you. The exact ratio should have no bearing on it. Only the subject matter and the relationship within, should matter....

This sure makes working without cropping an easier task.......
Why don't I crop......hmmmm, glad ya asked......

It it from many years doing my own darkroom work. I loved a black border on my images. My Leica enlargers had negative carriers that were cut to provide a nice black border. I could never figure out how to put a border on if I cropped the image.....
So, I never cropped......

Well, that's the tech reason,...
the aesthetic reason is that I am a purest at heart and try to follow a tradition, (street work), established long before I even knew it existed.......
I would thing that cropping at time of taking the picture would be the best way to do it, but most cameras don't have a really easy way of changing the aspect ratio quickly.

What I normaly do is take the picture in 4:3 and have the apsect ratio in mind at time of taking the picture.
For example, here: https://www.mu-43.com/showthread.php?t=288&page=3

When I took the picture of the cityscape, when I took it, I already knew I wanted it in 16:9 aspect ratio, and composed for it, even thought he original picture was in 4:3.
 

Brian Mosley

Administrator Emeritus
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
2,998
The 4/3 ratio is a very complex visually.
There's little tension created by the framing so you have to create the tension carefully with subject matter.
Shooter
Fascinating, could you expand on this a little Don... what do you mean by visually complex? do you mean by little tension, that the image looks 'normal' - I can relate to that when thinking of how I use 16:9 and square sometimes.

Cheers

Brian
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom