If you were starting from scratch

DynaSport

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
3,018
Real Name
Dan
what three lenses would you start with? I started in M43 several years ago with different priorities than I have now. I came from Canon APS-C and heavy 2.8 zooms. I had stopped taking my camera with me because it had become a hassle. So I wanted a small ILC that I could fit in a pocket and take with me all the time. I discovered that even the E-PM1 and kit lens wouldn’t find in my jeans pocket and for more serious shooting I wanted a camera with a better grip. And my lens purchases have been made with changing priorities over the years so that now I own some glass I would no longer have bought. In fact I may sell a few, which I generally don’t like doing. But all that got me thinking that if I was starting today, what would I buy. I’ll be honest and say my list isn’t realistic for me. I don’t think I could bring myself to spend this much on three lenses all at once. But hey, this is just an academic exercise. No one is charging this to my bank account today.

So, here is mine.
First the 12-100. I’ve not used the lens, but the quality photos I’ve seen captured with this lens is amazing for such a superzoom. I’d really like to have a copy. Instead, I have the P14-140, which is a pretty decent lens itself. Smaller than the 12-100, but I’d like the dual IS and quality upgrade of the 12-100.
Next is the 300 Pro. It’s easy to drop this kind of money on lenses. A Nikon or Canon 70-200 2.8 will cost this much or more. But it’s a lot of money to me, which is why I don’t own one yet. But I do think I will eventually.

And finally I’d want a prime for indoor and low light photos. But which one? My most used prime has been my PL25, so while part of me wants the 45 Pro, I think the 25 is more versatile and so the 25 Pro would be my first prime.

What about you?
 

Wibbly23

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Nov 6, 2018
Messages
131
i just started, so what i'm doing is from scratch...


i got the em1.2 in a kit with a 12-40 pro for a pretty nice discount (i think olympus had a 700 dollar CAD rebate at the time), i have the 40-150 on the way

after that i'll probably get the 45 1.2 pro, or a voigtlander nokton 25 f.95

that's all i'm really interested in at the moment.
 

wjiang

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
Sep 7, 2013
Messages
7,342
Location
Christchurch, New Zealand
*shrug* I buy and sell, so at any one time what I have is basically what I'd get starting from scratch anyway. The PL50-200 with 1.4 TC being the exception - I can't really justify that over my second-hand 100-300 II.

If I was to be strictly limited to 3 lenses? 12-40 f/2.8, 50-200 f/2.8-4 + 1.4 TC, 25mm f/1.8.
 

DynaSport

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
3,018
Real Name
Dan
*shrug* I buy and sell, so at any one time what I have is basically what I'd get starting from scratch anyway. The PL50-200 with 1.4 TC being the exception - I can't really justify that over my second-hand 100-300 II.

If I was to be strictly limited to 3 lenses? 12-40 f/2.8, 50-200 f/2.8-4 + 1.4 TC, 25mm f/1.8.
I didn’t mean this as a strictly limited to three lens exercise. I meant the first three lenses you’d buy now if you didn’t have any. Most people don’t buy more than three lenses immediately upon buying a new camera system. Most, not all clearly.
 

saladin

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
May 29, 2015
Messages
1,683
Location
Melbourne
Real Name
jason
so many factors in play, even ignoring price. The lenses i'd choose would be in part effected by the body i'd choose, which in turn would depend on the usage of the kit. And depending on which side of the bed i get out of, that could be prioritising smallness or a priority of outright quality! LOL.

that said, I'm generally a prime lens fan. If i am being honest and starting from scratch, in the real world of family life economics , i'd probably look at the compromise price range and get the three sigma's - 16, 30, 56 /1.4's.

And then constantly yearn for the PL and Pro lenses.........
 

Carbonman

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 10, 2014
Messages
2,399
Location
Vancouver BC
Real Name
Graham
The 3 Olympus Pro zooms I currently have: 7-14, 12-40 and 40-150. I started from scratch about 4-1/2 years ago and am almost done with my lens hoarding.
@DynaSport , the 300 is an awesome lens with or without the 1.4TC.
 

Bushboy

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2018
Messages
973
Location
Aotearoa
Real Name
Charlie
No1. Olympus 30mm macro
No2. Olympus 12-100
No3. Panasonic 100-400
 

ac12

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Apr 24, 2018
Messages
1,837
Location
SF Bay Area, California, USA
Here are my 2 options, #1 is my budget kit, #2 more expensive but still not full pro kit.

Option 1: (This is what I started with and still have and use for my travel kit, and I would do this again.)
  1. Panasonic 12-60/3.5-5.6 (This is my GP lens)
  2. Olympus 17/1.8 (My low light indoor lens)
  3. Olympus 40-150R/4-5.6 (An optional lens, as the 12-60 is long enough for 95+% of my shots.)
  4. Olympus 14-42EZ or Panasonic 14-42 or Panasonic 20/1.8 pancake lens. (Another optional lens, for compact carry.)
Option 2: (This brings in the pro 12-100, but at significantly more $$$)
  1. Olympus 12-100/4 (This would be the GP lens.)
  2. Panasonic 12-60/3.5-5.6 (This would be my lighter travel GP lens.)
  3. Olympus 17/1.8 (My low light lens.)
  4. Olympus 14-42EZ or Panasonic 14-42 or Panasonic 20/1.8 pancake lens. (An optional lens, for compact carry.)
Notes:
  • Olympus 17/1.8 (My low light indoor lens. My logic was that if I was shooting in low light, it would probably be indoors, and indoors space is tight, so the wider 17 would be better than the 20 or 25.)
  • Olympus 14-42EZ or Panasonic 14-42 or Panasonic 20/1.8 pancake lens. (For a compact carry lens when you want the camera to be as small as possible. The pancake lens makes the EM10 about the size of a medium P&S camera.)
Depending on what you shoot you may want a longer x-300 lens or an ultra-wide lens.

The other half is the camera itself.
  • EM1-mk2 or EM1-mk1 or EM5-mk2 (For my standard camera.)
  • EM10-mk2 or mk3. (For compact size. I have an EM1, and I bought an EM10-mk2 to have a smaller compact alternate/companion camera. I would probably be happy with just the EM10-mk2.)
  • The EM5-mk2 and EM10 use the same battery, so logistics is easier than the EM1 + EM10 combo which use different batteries.
 

ToxicTabasco

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Jul 2, 2018
Messages
1,299
Location
South West USA
Real Name
ToxicTabasco
I learned from years of DSLR what my regrets and success are with a lens system. Thus, when I switched to Lumix G9 it would be the lenses I wanted but did not get when shooting DSLR due to huge size, weight, and high cost. Thus, with G9, the 12-35 f/2.8 II, 35-100 f/2.8 II, and 100-300 f/4-5.6 II. And for the GX85 the 15mm f/1.7, and 42.5mm f/1.7.

But for bird photography, I'm regretting the 100-300 and possibly getting the 100-400 for the extra reach, and clarity on the long end. But, the size and weight are still a big concern for me. Super telephoto is uncharted ground for me with micro four thirds. Still learning and trying to find the best lens for it.
 

Jay_M

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Jul 30, 2018
Messages
514
Location
AZ
Price is a big factor in what lenses I actually purchase. I would love to get some of the longer PL zooms, but I doubt I will ever pony up the $$$ to get one of those. I really like the 3 PL lenses I have now, but if price wasn't a concern I would trade my PL 15 for the PL 50-200, and keep my PL 25 and PL 12-60 to go with it. I don't plan on getting rid of my PL 15, just for the exercise of what 3 lenses I would work with.
 

ac12

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Apr 24, 2018
Messages
1,837
Location
SF Bay Area, California, USA
The neat thing about m4/3 is the 2 lines of lenses; non-pro and pro.
I can see a very good reason to have both the non-pro lenses (for their compact size and light weight), and the pro lenses (for the FAST speed). And this is what I am going to head towards.

The only wrinkle for me, is the heavy Olympus 40-150/2.8 vs. the lighter Panasonic 35-100/2.8.
 

KeithT

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jan 17, 2017
Messages
232
Location
South Africa
Real Name
Keith Temlett
Interesting post Dan - thankfully academic only.:wink:

Watched a video on the EM1.2 and was gobsmacked. Couldn't afford it so decided the EM1.1 was more that I could use . . . . and it still is .:biggrin: My first ILC camera.

Regarding lenses I really knew nothing. Even bought lenses before I got the camera.

Saw a local ad for a gent selling off his 43 kit. So what did I do? . . . bought the 70-300mm - wow! :dash2:

Saw he also had a 50mm f2 so after learning a bit and after joining this forum I bought that too.

GAS took over so I then bought:

Oly 25mm 1.8
Oly 14-42mm (for my wife)
Oly 12-50mm
Oly 40-150mm (x 2, 1 for my wife + EM10 mkII)

Having the 70-300mm I thought I could cover every scenario from 12-300mm, easy as that :coco:
(I mean after all the Sx50hs does 28-1200mm right, so i was about halfway there)

Wife didn't like an ILC, preferred Canon G16 and SX50HS, so I sold her camera and all the lenses listed above.

Looking at this forum (and DPR just a little) I decided (and budget played a roll) to go with the often described 43 trinity:
(made decisions based a lot on showcases and write-ups on this forum so a lot of you are to blame :rofl:)

Oly 50mm f2, which I had and used exclusively for about a year.
Oly 12-60mm (which I know you have)
Oly 50-200mm (which you also have)
Ec-14 and Ec-20

I bought the 12-60, 50-200, and the EC's Dec last year and only received them yesterday... long story short, a friend was supposed to go to the USA but trip was cancelled a few times so the lenses sat in Florida since Dec 2017 (and a lot happens in a year in the camera world).

Only received them two days ago so haven't even shot with them as yet.

Did I do the right thing going back to 43 lenses?, I hope not and only time will tell, but first impressions look good despite the weight and size.

Back to your question . . . . carte blanche (with hindsight) 3 lenses would be:

Oly 12-100mm is a no-brainer
Oly 300mm pro (if the rumoured 150-400mm was a reality I would take that instead)
Either 25mm f1.2 or 45mm f1.2 - I like zooms so probably the 25mm f1.2, probably more practical
(could I just squeeze in a Oly 150mm f2.... please)

Oh and if carte blanche I'd take the rumoured Em-1X as well without even seeing it :2thumbs: just because I could.

Hope to post pics reasonably soon from my old budget 43's :dance4:
 

Levster

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
1,330
Location
Portsmouth, United Kingdom
First off, for the camera I’d go:

Panasonic GX8 (maybe a G9 but I prefer the ergonomics of the GX8)

For lenses:

Olympus 12-100mm
Sigma 16mm f/1.4
Either Sigma 30mm f/1.4 or the new 56mm f/1.4

I think the combo of a good superzoom and a couple of super fast primes would be perfect for me.
 

jaapvanderkooij

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Nov 9, 2017
Messages
94
I switched over form Nikon last year.
As we travel a lot, my set was too heavy (in my opinion).
I bought a G80 with kitlens 12-60 which I think is good enough for the kind of pictures I take.
Together with that set I bought the 100-400 as I like to try to make pictures of birds and wildlife.
Later I added the G9.
At this moment I am looking at the PL 15mm as I want to take pictures when we have dinner with our guests in dark yurts, but preferrably without flash.

As soon as the Panasonic FF comes out I will have a look at that, if the menu's and the buttons on the camera are equal to the G9, then my G80 will go and I will (try) to get the FF with a standard zoom and a wideangle prime.
 

alex66

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Jul 23, 2010
Messages
1,487
Three is quite hard.
Though first three would probably be these;
Panasonic 12-60 the kit one as it is lighter
One of the 25mm lenses not the Olympus 1.2 though as it is too heavy
Any of the 42.5 or 45mm lenses though again the 1.7/8 versions due to weight.
But I may but the 17mm 1.8 instead of the 12-60 and forgo the usefulness of zoom over the increasing ease of shooting at the 17 angle of view. I would in honesty get four pretty quickly and they would be the core of my kit, a second body would also be a very quick addition.
 

retiredfromlife

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
May 15, 2016
Messages
3,698
Location
Sydney, Australia
If money was no object and I did not care about repairability, otherwise I would pick the compromises I have already made.

Oly 12-100 pro
Panasonic 100-400 [ or Oly 150-400 possibly]
Either the Oly 25 1.2 or the Oly 60 macro
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom