If Canon can put a fast "pancake" zoom onto the G1 X, why not Olympus or Panasonic?

hookgrip

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
May 21, 2013
Messages
150
Here's an interesting comparison:

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


The lens on the G1X Mark II is a 12.5-62.5mm (24-120mm equiv) f/2.0-3.9, and it looks to be almost the same size as the Olympus/Panasonic f/3.5-5.6 pancake lenses with much shorter zoom ranges. Bearing in mind that the G1X Mk II has a slightly larger sensor than Micro 4/3, I wonder why no such lens has been developed for MFT. The G1X Mk II sells for $799, so the manufacturing cost of its lens must be considerably less than that.


There's a crazy size difference between the G1X Mk II's lens and the Olympus 12-50,despite the Canon lens covering a larger sensor, having a longer zoom range, and being almost two stops faster.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)



Oh, and the G1X Mk II's lens has a built-in, self-retracting lens cap.
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)



IMO the G1X Mk II's lens would be the perfect "do it all" lens on MFT...considerably smaller than the existing 12-35 or 12-40 f/2.8, 1 stop faster at the wide end, and much more reach at the long end.


What do you think is stopping Olympus or Panasonic from making a similarly sized fast-zoom for Micro 4/3?
 

Klorenzo

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
1,905
Real Name
Lorenzo
Good question, I'm surprised there are no replies yet.

Maybe it's a different compromise in size vs quality? I think it's easy to stretch a lens giving up a few aspects that most users wont notice (borders) or are easy to correct in camera (distortion, CA, etc.). More patents on the canon side?

It's a fixed lens, so the mount, focus distances, and anything like that are built to accept nothing but those focal lengths. I mean that hypothetically you could not cut that lens and replace it with a ultra wide or long tele. Maybe one part of the lens is inside the body.

Marketing reasons? Maybe Oly/Pana could stretch the pancakes a little more, up to similar specs. But then, maybe, a lot of people are not going to buy any other lenses. Here you do not have that problem.

A little less manufacturing/testing costs: here you do not have to add a solid mount ring, touch contacts, lens firmware compatibility, distortion/ca correction for multiple lenses, etc.

Sensor resolutions is bigger but has a lower pixel count, 12.8 MP, maybe this allows some shortcomings in the lens resolution.

I have not idea actually, I'm just thinking out loud.
 

Bhupinder2002

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Messages
4,313
Location
Melbourne Australia
What do you think is stopping Olympus or Panasonic from making a similarly sized fast-zoom for Micro 4/3?[/QUOTE]

Because.
1) There is no need at all. There are three compact zooms available and quite a few MFT bodies are even smaller than G1X series .
2) Canon doesn't have a full line of MFT small lenses and bodies as compared to Olympus and panasonic . I would be happy to have a ILC if I have to have zoom .
3) Now people can start asking for MFT cameras with fixed lenses like Sigma .. MFT with 17.5 mm 1.8 , 25mm 1.5 etc etc.
4) Canon is an established player and can experiment a bit but panasonic and Olympus can't afford to deviate at this point of time .In future may be :smile:
 

Klorenzo

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
1,905
Real Name
Lorenzo
1) There is no need at all. There are three compact zooms available and quite a few MFT bodies are even smaller than G1X series .
I would buy that. It's almost my dream lens: 12-62 f/2-4. If it would be that small and at least as good as the 14-42. IMO It's the ultimate travel lens.
 

Reflector

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 31, 2013
Messages
2,146
It helps a lot that Canon could closely integrate the sensor to the lens, they might be exploiting an incredibly small flange distance as well.

I could post a rant about how a lot of people can't understand why you would ever want a lens like that and how the same crowd will try to make up a bunch of reasons why such a nice lens couldn't exist for a reasonable price like $1,000 but I think that will only make me even more of a "undesirable" than posting an image of my E-M5 with a Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8A attached, with a Speedbooster+Regular adapter combo giving me a 13-35mm f/1.2-1.8A lens (FoV: 26-70mm). Or how I could use a 17-55mm f/2.8 lens to make a 12-55mm f/2.0-2.8 (FoV: 24-110mm.) Hey, it sounds like I could one of the people who wants a f/2.8-4.0 extended zoom pancake thing...

It'd be totally awesome if Olympus or Panasonic could make a m43 format G1X II Pancake lens. If it is optically excellent I'd probably be one of the early preorders already if the price is reasonable.
 

dejongj

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jun 3, 2013
Messages
230
Location
Whipsnade, UK
Real Name
Jean-Paul
a) it is a fixed lens camera, not interchangeable
b) have you seen the size of it when it is fully extended. It is a monster..
 
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,397
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Real Name
Nic
The ability to collapse the the lens well inside the body cavity would help in the case of the G1X, whereas the entirety of a Micro 4/3 lens has to fit outside the lens mount. I'm not sure how the lens in the G1X MkII fares for overall quality, but even the one in MkI was seriously good and also had a longer zoom range than the Micro 4/3 pancake zooms.
 

Klorenzo

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
1,905
Real Name
Lorenzo
Here you can make a comparison with the EM-10 (with the pancake zoom I suppose). IMO there are a lot more details in the OMD raw files. And less of other defects. In the cards, in the small text and even in the Beatles. And in the corners even more.

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canon-powershot-g1-x-mark-ii/10

I'm not very interested in the comparison in itself, but only as a possible answer to this thread title.
 

wushumr2

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
137
Luckypenguin nailed it. The lens probably collapses inside the body, and because you don't need a lens mount you can shave just that much off the overall length. Plus, I haven't seen any samples that really show the Canon body/lens combo to be a winner.
 

drd1135

Zen Snapshooter
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Messages
6,147
Location
Southwest Virginia
Real Name
Steve
It would be interesting for Olympus or Panasonic to build a fixed zoom mu43 compact. Of course, the G1X sales don't cut into Canon DSLR sales the way an mu43 compact would cut into mu43 sales since the latter depends on size as a selling point.
 
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,397
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Real Name
Nic
The G1X MkII seems to have the same basic sensor as the original, so unless the new lens is lacking then the IQ should be just as good.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

CG1X-IMG_2556-PR Canon Powershot G1X Bolivia by Nic (Luckypenguin), on Flickr



Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

CG1X-IMG_2652-PR Canon Powershot G1X Altiplano Bolivia by Nic (Luckypenguin), on Flickr



Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

CG1X-IMG_2660-PR Canon Powershot G1X Altiplano Bolivia by Nic (Luckypenguin), on Flickr



Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

CG1X-IMG_2733-PR Canon Powershot G1X Altiplano Bolivia by Nic (Luckypenguin), on Flickr



Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

CG1X-IMG_2586-PR Canon Powershot G1X Altiplano Bolivia by Nic (Luckypenguin), on Flickr



Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

CG1X-IMG_2585-PR Canon Powershot G1X Altiplano Bolivia by Nic (Luckypenguin), on Flickr



Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

CG1X-IMG_2719-PR Canon Powershot G1X Altiplano Bolivia by Nic (Luckypenguin), on Flickr



Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

CG1X-IMG_2708-PR Canon Powershot G1X Altiplano Bolivia by Nic (Luckypenguin), on Flickr



Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

CG1X-IMG_2593-PR Canon Powershot G1X Altiplano Bolivia by Nic (Luckypenguin), on Flickr



Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

CG1X-IMG_2722-PR Canon Powershot G1X Altiplano Bolivia by Nic (Luckypenguin), on Flickr



Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

CG1X-IMG_2751-PR Canon Powershot G1X Altiplano Bolivia by Nic (Luckypenguin), on Flickr



Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

CG1X-IMG_2747-PR Canon Powershot G1X Altiplano Bolivia by Nic (Luckypenguin), on Flickr



Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

CG1X-IMG_2568-PR Canon Powershot G1X Uyuni Bolivia by Nic (Luckypenguin), on Flickr
 

Jonathan F/2

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
Aug 10, 2011
Messages
5,013
Location
Los Angeles, USA
Man, I wish Canon would release a fast fixed prime G1X, like the old school Canonets, that'd be sweet!

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

Klorenzo

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
1,905
Real Name
Lorenzo
The G1X MkII seems to have the same basic sensor as the original, so unless the new lens is lacking then the IQ should be just as good.
I think the quality is very good. But the point for me was the comparison with the Oly/Pana lenses, in terms of quality/size/speed.
 

yakky

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Jul 1, 2013
Messages
661
I agree, I think Pansonic and Oly should work on a faster and more compact zoom. We already have fast zooms, compact zooms and wayyyy too many regular kit zooms. I'd love a compact 2.8-4 in the 12-50 range.
 
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,397
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Real Name
Nic
I think the quality is very good. But the point for me was the comparison with the Oly/Pana lenses, in terms of quality/size/speed.
I don't think that we'll see something like either the new or old G1X lens in pancake form for Micro 4/3. While the two G1X lenses have the profile of a pancake when retracted they aren't actually pancakes lenses.
 

Ross the fiddler

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
3,880
Location
Blue Mountains, NSW, Australia
Real Name
Ross
The ability to collapse the the lens well inside the body cavity would help in the case of the G1X, whereas the entirety of a Micro 4/3 lens has to fit outside the lens mount. I'm not sure how the lens in the G1X MkII fares for overall quality, but even the one in MkI was seriously good and also had a longer zoom range than the Micro 4/3 pancake zooms.
And not only that, the 12-50 lens is fully zoomed because it is an all internal zooming & focussing design. Put a tube & filter on the fully extended GX1 lens & how far does that hang out then?
 

Klorenzo

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
1,905
Real Name
Lorenzo
Yes, one is a pancake and the other is not and that is fine. But what is strange is how much is better, by the numbers, when compared to the Oly/Pana pancake zooms. It's faster and with a better range. And it's better (again by the number) even than the big 12-50.
 

Dan43

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
50
I also find it quite baffling that the specs of the canon lens are so much better; especially when considering that this sensor size is a lot more important to Olympus than to Canon. One would assume that the lenses offered by Olympus push the limits in terms of aperture size/lens size.

Even more so, a lens like this is exactly what the m43 lineup is still missing - i.e. something with a larger aperture than a kit lens, but smaller and more affordable than the 12-40.
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom