1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

I have 3 lenses...

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by Speedliner, Aug 28, 2015.

  1. Speedliner

    Speedliner Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Mar 2, 2015
    Southern NJ, USA
    Rob
    I have 3 lenses capable of 150mm FL and I'm contemplating 2 more! What's wrong with me!!!
     
  2. tkbslc

    tkbslc Super Moderator

    Assuming the 150 Macro, 40-150 and 50-200?

    Obviously the 40-150 is a lot smaller than the 50-200
    The 50-200 has more reach and faster aperture than the 40-150
    and neither of them can do macro.

    So I don't see a problem with those 3. What else are you looking at?
     
  3. Speedliner

    Speedliner Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Mar 2, 2015
    Southern NJ, USA
    Rob
    Yes Tk. Those are the three.

    The other two are the 40-150 Pro and the 150,f2. The latter would only be if I stumbled into one for very cheap.

    When Pany announces the 100-400 zoom that one might make the list if it performs well, but that isn't for the 150FL so maybe it doesn't count.

    :) 
     
  4. tkbslc

    tkbslc Super Moderator

    The 40-150mm Pro makes sense if it is to replace the 50-200 for a little bit faster AF, but otherwise it isn't going to be adding much to the kit. It's not even any smaller and only a little bit lighter than the 50-200.

    Everybody wants the 150mm f2.0! :) 
     
  5. Speedliner

    Speedliner Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Mar 2, 2015
    Southern NJ, USA
    Rob
    Yes it would be just for the faster, more reliable AF. The 50-200 would stay for its reach and use with the TCs, at least until the 300 and 100-400 appear and their performance understood.

    Caveat here...all of these lenses are capable of more than I am. My time is short and I just want the satisfaction of knowing that when I'm presented with an uncommon shot, I get the max from the opportunity. I have had the 40-150r with me a few times and it was just too slow for the exposure situation. Likewise the 50-200 just missed focus or a shot due to focus. Doesn't amount to a lot of missed shots, but when shooting moving, unpredictable objects in the hour or two I get in a month every little bit helps.
     
  6. gryphon1911

    gryphon1911 Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Mar 13, 2014
    Central Ohio, USA
    Andrew
    I often thought of selling off he 40-150/4-5.6 when I bought the 40-150/2.8 PRO

    However, for bringing about everyday - I'd rather have the slower aperture with the smaller overall size than the faster glass - especially since i will be shooting during the day with it most of the time.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. Phocal

    Phocal Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Jan 3, 2014
    Houston
    Easy fix for the 50-200, Focus Tune.
     
  8. nstelemark

    nstelemark Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    May 28, 2013
    Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
    Larry
    There is only one 150 FL lens. Just sayin' :biggrin:
     
  9. agentlossing

    agentlossing Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Jun 26, 2013
    Andrew Lossing
    You're crazy!! o_O 

    Or else you like that focal length!
     
  10. Speedliner

    Speedliner Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Mar 2, 2015
    Southern NJ, USA
    Rob
    Just crazy.

    Yes Phocal, just got the v4 upgrade in the mail, but the 50-200 still hunts a bit ... Always at the worst time :) 
     
  11. Baimei

    Baimei Mu-43 Regular

    56
    Dec 15, 2011
    Yes, the 150/2 is "my precious"
    But the 40-150/2.8 isn't bad either!
    Get both

    Rick
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.