I am really Happy with whats comming out of my EPL-5

Discussion in 'Olympus Cameras' started by Fred S, Jan 25, 2014.

  1. Fred S

    Fred S Mu-43 Top Veteran

    637
    Feb 20, 2012
    Calgary
    Fred S
    EPL-5 12-50 lens , I am a jpg shooter

    ISO 200 F 9.0 shutter 250
    No, NOT perfect but they are OOC

    Bow-valley-01-01-14_zps3921bcd5.jpg

    Bow-valley-02-01-14_zps154043c1.jpg
     
    • Like Like x 16
  2. wjiang

    wjiang Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Wow, nice shots of epic scenes. It's great to see the maligned 12-50 put to great use.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. billbooz

    billbooz Mu-43 Regular

    198
    Jan 23, 2014
    Lynchburg, VA USA
    William H. Booz
    Fred, agreed. Just upgraded from Olympus PEN E-PL3, which I owned two months, to the E-PL5 and I am really impressed at the image quality! I usually have the Oly 17mm, f/2.8 on it, but otherwise use the standard kit and any issues I have with any images are typically due to me and not the camera!
     
  4. Lindsay D

    Lindsay D Mu-43 Veteran

    352
    Jan 2, 2013
    West Sussex, England
    Lindsay
    The EPL5 is very impressive, it never ceases to amaze me, I have it with me all the time.
     
  5. katiedaddy

    katiedaddy Mu-43 Regular

    70
    Jan 31, 2014
    MD, USA
    I will receive my E-PM2 in the mail today and can't wait to try it after seeing your beautiful pictures since it shares same censors as E-PL5.
    This will be my second tryout of m4/3 after EP1 & EPL1 hopefully it will take some time away from my Fuji system.
     
  6. Ddeveryday

    Ddeveryday Mu-43 Regular

    53
    Feb 24, 2013
    Wow stunning pictures! I have owned the GF1, G3, and P3. I have to say, the handling of the PL5 was a little awkward at first, but its picture quality really out weights the awkward handling! I'm always amazed at picture quality of this little guy. it's been my favorite m4/3 camera so far!

    Is the 12-50mm worth it if you already own the 14-42?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. Fred S

    Fred S Mu-43 Top Veteran

    637
    Feb 20, 2012
    Calgary
    Fred S
    I agree . Its a little awkward.

    I picked up my 12-50 locally for 200 IMO a good deal
    I do a fair amount of hiking so I need a Land scape macro lens . the 12-50 fit the bill.
    I like the extra 2 mm for land scape

    13-10-waterfalls01_zps982aae9a.jpg

    P9190158-001_zpsaa23cc9b.jpg
     
    • Like Like x 3
  8. memzinla

    memzinla Mu-43 Top Veteran

    549
    Oct 31, 2012
    Los Angeles, CA
    Wow very nice images. I had to sell my E-M5 because of money issues, and bought a Canon SL1. I forgot about the EPL5. -_- How is the video quality on the EPL5? Is there a place where I can download the original video files?
     
  9. RT_Panther

    RT_Panther Mu-43 Legend

    May 4, 2011
    Texas
    Love mine too! :cool:
     
  10. betamax

    betamax Mu-43 Regular

    196
    May 7, 2011
    NSW, Australia
    Alan
    I don't find the E-PL5 awkward at all. Having crossed the threshhold usablity wise last year sometime. Now everything comes second nature and only one or two clicks away. I don't even use the EVF except for once or twice when it was really sunnny.

    Thought about getting the 12-50 for it as well at that price, but now that the 12-32 is out, I might go for that instead once it's more widely available.
     
  11. jaydubstar

    jaydubstar Mu-43 Regular

    37
    Jan 16, 2014
    Bellingham, WA
    Jayme
    My PL5 is a complete equal to my EM5... In fact, I prefer the viewfinder flexibility (have VF2, considering VF4)... It is also a better accessory for a night out on the town than the OMD, IMO
     
  12. Fred S

    Fred S Mu-43 Top Veteran

    637
    Feb 20, 2012
    Calgary
    Fred S
    Sorry . I can't answer that. I do not shoot video
    maybe some one who does can chime in
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.