How effective is the hood for the 12-50 for keeping rain off the front element?

LowriderS10

Monkey with a camera.
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
2,482
Location
Canada
Hey all,

So I'm thinking of getting a hood for my 12-50, but it's really expensive (I know, there are some third party ones, and I'm considering those, but in general for hoods I prefer OEM, as they tend to have better fitment).

The only real reason I want it is to keep rain off the front element...I love that the lens/body (E-M5) are weather resistant, and it's held up to quite a bit of rain for me, so I'm very confident in using it in less than ideal environments). But...I always have to be careful with the front element, which is a bit of an annoyance. I have an extra UV filter kicking around at home that I might toss on there during the rain, so I wipe that and not the front element, but keeping rain off of it in the first place would be the best.

I know that every rain is unique, but I'm looking for a GENERAL CONSENSUS...in your experience...how useful (or useless) has the hood been in keeping the front element dry?

Thanks!
 

David A

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Sep 30, 2011
Messages
1,920
Location
Brisbane, Australia
The Olympus hood is quite shallow. I'm guessing here because I haven't used the lens in the rain. The hood would keep rain off if the rain was coming from behind you and it would probably keep rain off if the rain was falling vertically and you didn't tilt the lens up a bit. If the rain was coming from the front at an angle it would not keep it off the front element of the lens unless the angle was extremely close to vertical.

There's 3 situations there and a different answer to each. Sorry about that but it is an extremely shallow lens hood and that means everything depends on the rain and where it's coming from.
 

LowriderS10

Monkey with a camera.
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
2,482
Location
Canada
Thanks, yeah, I mean I figured as much, that's why I was hoping someone with experience could chime in. :)
 

OzRay

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
4,991
Location
South Gippsland, Australia
Real Name
Ray, not Oz
Get a lens hood and a B&W MRC filter. This combination has served me well, not only in my news and sports work where I've had rain, mud and even champagne sprayed on me, my camera and lens/lenses; but also when in the bush in all manner of conditions. The hood provides a degree of protection, the B&W filter allows you to wipe the filter with whatever is handy and pretty much leaves it smear free and allows you to continue to shoot.
 

ahinesdesign

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Dec 6, 2011
Messages
541
Location
NC, USA
Real Name
Aaron
The rectangular hood won't do much to keep rain or other things off the front element - its just not deep enough to protect it...
 

Replytoken

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
3,600
Location
Puget Sound
Real Name
Ken
If you mostly want to keep off rain, why not buy a B+W rubber hood? They collapse easily so you can just push it back when shooting wide angle. This would probably provide a bit more rain protection than the stock hood.

--Ken
 

Mohun

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
81
It seems to me that designing any lens hood for a zoom lens is challenging, the more extreme the zoom, the more challenging. The 12-50 is a 4X zoom and one would have to design a hood of compromises that must be cognizant of both vignetting and glare, and the hood within an acceptable size. I wonder if anyone has designed a really effective hood for a "super-zoom?"
 

LowriderS10

Monkey with a camera.
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
2,482
Location
Canada
Get a lens hood and a B&W MRC filter. This combination has served me well, not only in my news and sports work where I've had rain, mud and even champagne sprayed on me, my camera and lens/lenses; but also when in the bush in all manner of conditions. The hood provides a degree of protection, the B&W filter allows you to wipe the filter with whatever is handy and pretty much leaves it smear free and allows you to continue to shoot.
Thanks, yeah, I know IN GENERAL they're good, this isn't my first rodeo. :) I've shot tons in bad weather, and had everything from seaspray to fire retardant on my lenses lol...but I'm wondering specifically about this lens/hood combo. :)

The original rectangular hood is not much help at all, but then it was designed for the 9-18mm. The new petal hood looks more useful.
Huh...I didn't even know there was a new hood...thanks! :)

LH-55C is the model number for the new hood.
Wicked, thanks, I just had a look, it definitely looks much more useful for the rain, as it has a far bigger top portion! I'll see if I can grab one somewhere. Do you know if it can be stored reversed?

The rectangular hood won't do much to keep rain or other things off the front element - its just not deep enough to protect it...
That's what I was afraid of...thanks for commenting! :)

The original hood is basically useless. I haven't tried the new one.
Too bad...thank you! :)

If you mostly want to keep off rain, why not buy a B+W rubber hood? They collapse easily so you can just push it back when shooting wide angle. This would probably provide a bit more rain protection than the stock hood.

--Ken
Hmm....I haven't thought of that...might be a good option. I'm just generally weary of hoods that need to thread onto plastic filter threads. Plus, if I run a UV filter as well, it might get too thick and would just have to take off/put on constantly...
 

snaper

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Sep 24, 2014
Messages
28
Location
Germany, Mannheim
Hello all, I am new here in this forum.

I just bought the 12-50 and a LH-55C as an all day compilation for my e-m10. I can confirm that the JJC Hood also works very well with the m.Zuiko 9-18. It is much more useful than the Olympus hood!
 

LowriderS10

Monkey with a camera.
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
2,482
Location
Canada
Hello all, I am new here in this forum.

I just bought the 12-50 and a LH-55C as an all day compilation for my e-m10. I can confirm that the JJC Hood also works very well with the m.Zuiko 9-18. It is much more useful than the Olympus hood!
Thanks for the info!

Does the JJC fit well? (Not loose?) Can you store it backwards on the lens?

The JJC is still very expensive, but at least not $45! :)
 

ahinesdesign

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Dec 6, 2011
Messages
541
Location
NC, USA
Real Name
Aaron
Thank you again! And why not perfect? Is it wobbly/loose?
The JJC hood that I have for my 12-50 is far from loose, quite the opposite. It takes more force to install or remove than any other lens hood I've ever used. No worries about it being accidentally knocked off...
 

snaper

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Sep 24, 2014
Messages
28
Location
Germany, Mannheim
When backwards mounted just the lock position is not as perfect as on the original hood. But up to now I havn't lost it. Don't worry I am sure you'll be happy with the hood of JJC.
If you want I can send you some pictures when I am back from work in a few hours.
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom